Cited by 189Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesDigital Mental Health InterventionsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Treatment-as-usual (TAU) is anything but usual: a meta-analysis of CBT versus TAU for anxiety and depression

Watts, Sarah E., Turnell, Adrienne, Kladnitski, Natalie, Newby, Jill M., Andrews, Gavin·2015·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Objectives There were three aims of this study, the first was to examine the efficacy of CBT versus treatment-as-usual (TAU) in the treatment of anxiety and depressive disorders, the second was to examine how TAU is defined in TAU control groups for those disorders, and the third was to explore whether the type of TAU condition influences the estimate of effects of CBT.Method A systematic search of Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycINFO, and CINAHL was conducted.Results 48 studies of CBT for depressive or anxiety disorders (n=6926) that specified that their control group received TAU were identified. Most (n=45/48) provided an explanation of the TAU group however there was significant heterogeneity amongst TAU conditions. The meta-analysis showed medium effects favoring CBT over TAU for both anxiety (g=0.69, 95% CI 0.47-0.92, p<0.001, n=1318) and depression (g=0.70, 95% CI 0.49-0.90, p<0.001, n=5054), with differential effects observed across TAU conditions.Conclusions CBT is superior to TAU and the size of the effect of CBT compared to TAU depends on the nature of the TAU condition. The term TAU is used in different ways and should be more precisely described. The four key details to be reported can be thought of as "who, what, how many, and any additional treatments?"

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2014.12.025

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • TAU was found to be a very heterogeneous control condition and anything but usual or standard care.

    “TAU, in addition, was also found to be a very heterogeneous control condition and anything but usual or standard care85,86.”
  • Remission of depression in a mother has positive effects on her school aged and adolescent children for at least a year afterwards, including the children of mothers treated with medication or psychotherapy, and varying with the severity of maternal depression.

    “Remission of depression in a mother has positive effects on her school aged and adolescent children 564,676 for at least a year afterwards: 677 including the children of mothers treated with medication 676,678 or psychotherapy, 679-682 and varying with the severity of maternal depression. 683”
  • Usually, the effect size of cognitive behavioral therapies is smaller when compared with TAU than with a wait-list condition.

    “Usually, the effect size of cognitive behavioral therapies is smaller, for example, when compared with TAU than with a wait-list condition (56).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Watts, S. E., Turnell, A., Kladnitski, N., Newby, J. M., & Andrews, G.
Affiliations
St Vincent's Hospital Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Newby, Jill M.
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-04
Volume
175
Pages
152-167
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2083442609
Cited by
188
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 7
FWCI
1.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, usual care, anxiety disorders, depressive disorders, treatment efficacy, differential treatment effects
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Humans, Thinking, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review