Cited by 75Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Cognitive Behavior Therapy versus Supportive Therapy in Social Phobia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Cottraux, Jean, Note, Ivan, Albuisson, Eliane, Yao, Saï Nan, Note, Brigitte, Mollard, Evelyne, Bonasse, Françoise, Jalenques, Isabelle +2 more·2000·Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics

Abstract

Background: The efficacy of cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) in social phobia has been demonstrated in several controlled trials and meta-analyses, but no comparison of CBT with supportive therapy (ST) can be found in the literature. Method: The aim of the trial was to study the effectiveness of CBT versus ST carried out ‘as usual’. Sixty-seven DSM-4 social phobic patients (89% generalized subtype, most with avoidant personality) were randomly allocated into two groups. Group 1 (CBT) received 8 1-hour sessions of individual cognitive therapy (CT) for 6 weeks, followed by 6 2-hour sessions of social skills training (SST) in group weekly. Group 2 received ST for 12 weeks (6 half-hour sessions), then the patients were switched to CBT. All patients agreed not to take any medication during the whole trial. In group 1, 29 patients reached week 6, 27 reached week 12, and 24 weeks 36 and 60 (endpoint). In group 2, 29 patients reached week 6, 28 reached weeks 12 and 18, 26 week 24, and 23 reached weeks 48 and 72 (endpoint). Results: At week 6, after CT, group 1 was better than group 2 on the main social phobia measure. At week 12, after SST, group 1 was better than group 2 on most of the measures and demonstrated a significantly higher rate of responders. This finding was replicated after switching group 2 to CBT. Sustained improvement was observed in both groups at follow-up. Compliance with abstinence from medication increased over time. Conclusions: CBT was more effective than ST and demonstrated long-lasting effects. This may suggest that social phobia management requires more than a simple and inexpensive psychological intervention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000012382

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Structured psychotherapies, with module (task) completion and review, are generally more effective than supportive psychotherapy.

    “This reflects the face-to-face literature, in that the structured psychotherapies, with module (task) completion and review, are generally more effective than supportive psychotherapy [72-74].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cottraux, J., Note, I., Albuisson, E., Yao, S. N., Note, B., Mollard, E., Bonasse, F., Jalenques, I., Guérin, J., & Coudert, A. J.
Affiliations
  • Lyon 1 Université (FR)
  • Aix-Marseille Université (FR)
  • Université Clermont Auvergne (FR)
Venue
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2000
Volume
69
Issue
3
Pages
137-146
ISSN
  • 0033-3190 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0348
OpenAlex
W2082564226
Cited by
75
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
social anxiety disorder, cognitive behavioral therapy, supportive therapy, social skills training, cognitive therapy, avoidant personality, treatment efficacy, long-term treatment outcomes
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Inventory, Phobic Disorders, Psychotherapy, Social Support, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review