The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 33 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
“I Hate This”: A Qualitative Analysis of Adolescents' Self-Reported Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Open accessAbstract
Purpose The COVID-19 pandemic presents unique challenges for adolescents because of disruptions in school and social life. We compiled a diverse group (36.8% nonwhite or multiracial) of high schoolers' open-ended responses to the question: "What are your three biggest challenges right now?" (N = 719 adolescents).Methods Using open and axial coding, we identified N = 1,902 thematic units (M = 2.64, SD = .701) and 14 thematic categories, including mental health, physical health, family, friends, social connection and community, academics, missing important events, socioeconomic issues, routine, COVID rules and adjustment, contraction/exposure to COVID, technology, and future plans.Results Adolescents most commonly reported challenges related to academics (23.7%) but also cited high numbers of challenges in mental (14.8%) and physical (13.2%) health and friend (11.4%) domains.Conclusions Efforts should focus on helping adolescents cultivate academic skills needed during school closures, providing mental/physical health resources and helping them navigate peer relationships-especially given ongoing remote education and social distancing due to the pandemic.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
33 Own result · 24 Not checked yet · 10 Own method · 6 Own interpretation · 2 No basis given
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This category was most commonly endorsed by adolescents (23.7%).”
§ “I Hate This”: A Qualitative Analysis of Adolescents’ Self-Reported Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic > Results > self-reported challenges faced by adolescents
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Challenges fell into this category 13.4% of the time.”
§ “I Hate This”: A Qualitative Analysis of Adolescents’ Self-Reported Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic > Results > self-reported challenges faced by adolescents
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A total of 14.8% of the units were assigned to this category.”
§ “I Hate This”: A Qualitative Analysis of Adolescents’ Self-Reported Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic > Results > self-reported challenges faced by adolescents
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In response to the open-ended question “what are your three biggest challenges right now", N = 719 participants wrote N = 1,902 thematic units (M = 2.64 units per participant, SD = .701, range: 1–5).”
§ “I Hate This”: A Qualitative Analysis of Adolescents’ Self-Reported Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic > Results
plainn = 719- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The friend category (11.4% of units) includes friend conflict, missing friends, and not seeing friends.”
§ “I Hate This”: A Qualitative Analysis of Adolescents’ Self-Reported Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic > Results > self-reported challenges faced by adolescents
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A total of 7.0% of challenges reported fell in this category.”
§ “I Hate This”: A Qualitative Analysis of Adolescents’ Self-Reported Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic > Results > self-reported challenges faced by adolescents
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Students identifying as male had the most challenges around academics and work habits and the future.”
§ “I Hate This”: A Qualitative Analysis of Adolescents’ Self-Reported Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic > Results > challenge categories by sociodemographic group
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“important events (e.g., graduation) were challenging to miss for adolescents.”
§ “I Hate This”: A Qualitative Analysis of Adolescents’ Self-Reported Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic > Discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Future concerns were endorsed more by third and fourth year students, but especially for fourth year students.”
§ “I Hate This”: A Qualitative Analysis of Adolescents’ Self-Reported Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic > Results > challenge categories by sociodemographic group
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“uncertainty about the future (e.g., finding a job) is another area of concern.”
§ “I Hate This”: A Qualitative Analysis of Adolescents’ Self-Reported Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic > Discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 23
- It may state two separate claims as one. 9
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Using content analysis, we generated a codebook with 14 categories, each described in the following text.”
§ “I Hate This”: A Qualitative Analysis of Adolescents’ Self-Reported Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic > Results > self-reported challenges faced by adolescents
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There were 1.7% of the responses coded in this category.”
§ “I Hate This”: A Qualitative Analysis of Adolescents’ Self-Reported Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic > Results > self-reported challenges faced by adolescents
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The technology category (1.4% of all units)”
§ “I Hate This”: A Qualitative Analysis of Adolescents’ Self-Reported Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic > Results > self-reported challenges faced by adolescents
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“while 6.8% of challenges involved COVID (either COVID rules and adjustment or COVID contraction/exposure), only 1.4% of all challenges reported involved concerns about contraction of or exposure to the virus itself.”
§ “I Hate This”: A Qualitative Analysis of Adolescents’ Self-Reported Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic > Discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Only 1.4% of units fell in this category.”
§ “I Hate This”: A Qualitative Analysis of Adolescents’ Self-Reported Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic > Results > self-reported challenges faced by adolescents
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We were unable to code a small number of units (1.1%; e.g., “I suck at frisbee golf").”
§ “I Hate This”: A Qualitative Analysis of Adolescents’ Self-Reported Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic > Results
plainn = 1,902- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Response categories were largely similar between the geographic location of school and socioeconomic status.”
§ “I Hate This”: A Qualitative Analysis of Adolescents’ Self-Reported Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic > Results > challenge categories by sociodemographic group
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Gender minority students reported the most challenges with mental and physical health, and social connection and community. However, this group reported the least challenges with family and friends.”
§ “I Hate This”: A Qualitative Analysis of Adolescents’ Self-Reported Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic > Results > challenge categories by sociodemographic group
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“our results confirmed this is a challenge faced by adolescents.”
§ “I Hate This”: A Qualitative Analysis of Adolescents’ Self-Reported Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic > Discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We made efforts to minimize bias, including the removal of any demographic information from the data file we used to code.”
§ “I Hate This”: A Qualitative Analysis of Adolescents’ Self-Reported Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic > Discussion
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We did not run any formal statistical tests as we were underpowered and wanted to minimize the risk of type 1 error due to multiple comparisons, and the analysis was exploratory in nature.”
§ “I Hate This”: A Qualitative Analysis of Adolescents’ Self-Reported Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic > Methods > Data analysis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“our coding may be a partial reflection of our biases and experiences.”
§ “I Hate This”: A Qualitative Analysis of Adolescents’ Self-Reported Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic > Discussion
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Scientists have warned that COVID-19 will have unprecedented effects on mental health [10,17]”
§ “I Hate This”: A Qualitative Analysis of Adolescents’ Self-Reported Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic > Abstract > Conclusions:
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“our data may be less relevant to adolescents at current given recent social and political movement.”
§ “I Hate This”: A Qualitative Analysis of Adolescents’ Self-Reported Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic > Discussion
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The COVID-19 virus itself does not disproportionately infect this age group [7].”
§ “I Hate This”: A Qualitative Analysis of Adolescents’ Self-Reported Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic > Abstract > Conclusions:
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [7] Castagnoli, 2020, Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in children and adolescents: A Systematic Review, JAMA Pediatr source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“mental health consequences of disasters outlast and cost more than the physical health effects [18].”
§ “I Hate This”: A Qualitative Analysis of Adolescents’ Self-Reported Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic > Abstract > Conclusions:
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [18] Morganstein, 2020, Ecological disasters and mental Health: Causes, consequences, and interventions, Front Psychiatry source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The first three authors unitized and coded the entire data set and were blinded to the participants’ race/ethnicity, gender, and age.”
§ “I Hate This”: A Qualitative Analysis of Adolescents’ Self-Reported Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic > Methods > Data analysis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“making our conclusions more applicable for students who may be experiencing continued disruptions this school year.”
§ “I Hate This”: A Qualitative Analysis of Adolescents’ Self-Reported Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic > Discussion
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Adolescents highly value peer connection and approval and are more likely to experience the onset of psychological disorders than during childhood [6].”
§ “I Hate This”: A Qualitative Analysis of Adolescents’ Self-Reported Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic > Abstract > Conclusions:
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [6] Steinberg, 2001, Adolescent development, Annu Rev Psychol
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We tested the codebook with 80% of the units to ensure the codebook captured all responses.”
§ “I Hate This”: A Qualitative Analysis of Adolescents’ Self-Reported Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic > Methods > Data analysis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“During the codebook testing and axial coding stage, we were blinded to our original codes generated during the open-coding process.”
§ “I Hate This”: A Qualitative Analysis of Adolescents’ Self-Reported Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic > Methods > Data analysis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The authors’ respective institutional review boards approved all procedures.”
§ “I Hate This”: A Qualitative Analysis of Adolescents’ Self-Reported Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic > Methods > Survey
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Subsidized meal programs, vaccination clinics, and school nurses are also crucial resources for youth health care, which are now severely limited or unavailable [9,11].”
§ “I Hate This”: A Qualitative Analysis of Adolescents’ Self-Reported Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic > Abstract > Conclusions:
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Historically, during economic recessions, the use of special education services for emotional and behavioral challenges has increased while child and adolescent mental health worsens [21].”
§ “I Hate This”: A Qualitative Analysis of Adolescents’ Self-Reported Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic > Abstract > Conclusions:
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [21] Golberstein, 2019, How do economic downturns affect the mental health of children? Evidence from the National health Interview survey, Heal Econ (United Kingdom)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“App-based psychosocial interventions may be helpful [31].”
§ “I Hate This”: A Qualitative Analysis of Adolescents’ Self-Reported Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [31] Lau, 2020, Android and iPhone mobile apps for psychosocial wellness and stress management: Systematic search in app stores and literature review, JMIR MHealth UHealth source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“with qualitative research, we recognize the potential for researcher bias in interpretation [32].”
§ “I Hate This”: A Qualitative Analysis of Adolescents’ Self-Reported Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [32] Galdas, 2017, Revisiting bias in qualitative research: Reflections on its relationship with funding and impact, Int J Qual Methods source
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“during this pandemic, increasing rates of domestic violence have been reported globally [22].”
§ “I Hate This”: A Qualitative Analysis of Adolescents’ Self-Reported Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic > Abstract > Conclusions:
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [22] Bradbury-Jones, 2020, The pandemic paradox: The consequences of COVID-19 on domestic violence, J Clin Nurs source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Researchers have called for incorporating and understanding youth perspectives of COVID-19 public health regulations when considering policy changes and understanding the pandemic’s effects [9,10].”
§ “I Hate This”: A Qualitative Analysis of Adolescents’ Self-Reported Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic > Abstract > Conclusions:
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [9] Armitage, 2020, Considering inequalities in the school closure response to COVID-19, Lancet Glob Health source
- Not checked yetcites [10] Holmes, 2020, Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: A call for action for mental health science, Lancet Psychiatry source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper relies on this without support.
Adolescents' own reports of their biggest challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic are not yet known.
“we do not yet know what adolescents themselves report as their biggest challenges during this global pandemic.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Public officials and communities often overlook the healthcare schools provide to adolescents.
“Public officials and communities often overlook the healthcare schools crucially provide to adolescents.”
The paper relies on this without support.
All students quickly adapted to e-learning platforms.
“Although all students quickly adapted to e-learning platforms”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Academic challenges have also been frequently reported by young people during the pandemic, particularly among secondary school-aged youth.32”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ “I Hate This”: A Qualitative Analysis of Adolescents’ Self-Reported Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic > Discussion
“White-Asian students reported the most challenges with physical health and fear of COVID contraction or exposure.”
§ “I Hate This”: A Qualitative Analysis of Adolescents’ Self-Reported Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic > Results > challenge categories by sociodemographic group
“students who were Hispanic/Latinx identified the most challenges related to physical health.”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ “I Hate This”: A Qualitative Analysis of Adolescents’ Self-Reported Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic > Abstract > Methods:
“physical (13.2%) health”
§ “I Hate This”: A Qualitative Analysis of Adolescents’ Self-Reported Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic > Results > self-reported challenges faced by adolescents
“Challenges fell into this category 13.4% of the time.”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ “I Hate This”: A Qualitative Analysis of Adolescents’ Self-Reported Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic > Discussion
“White-Asian students reported the most challenges with physical health and fear of COVID contraction or exposure.”
§ “I Hate This”: A Qualitative Analysis of Adolescents’ Self-Reported Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic > Results > challenge categories by sociodemographic group
“White-Latinx students described the most challenges related to routine and contraction/exposure to COVID-19.”
Citations
Cites
Holmes, E. A., O'Connor, R. C., Perry, V. H., Tracey, I., Wessely, S., Arseneault, L., Ballard, C., Christensen, H., Cohen Silver, R., Everall, I., et al. (2020) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(20)30168-1 · Cited by 5,715
Loades, M. E., Chatburn, E., Higson-Sweeney, N., Reynolds, S., Shafran, R., Brigden, A., Linney, C., McManus, M. N., Borwick, C., & Crawley, E. (2020) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2020.05.009 · Cited by 2,906
Steinberg, L., & Morris, A. S. (2001) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.83 · Cited by 2,517
Galea, S., Merchant, R. M., & Lurie, N. (2020) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.1562 · Cited by 2,089
Mental health effects of school closures during COVID-19
Lee, J. (2020) · The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/s2352-4642(20)30109-7 · Cited by 1,882
Suicide risk and prevention during the COVID-19 pandemic
Gunnell, D., Appleby, L., Arensman, E., Hawton, K., John, A., Kapur, N., Khan, M., O'Connor, R. C., Pirkis, J., Appleby, L., et al. (2020) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(20)30171-1 · Cited by 1,513
The effects of social deprivation on adolescent development and mental health
Orben, A., Tomova, L., & Blakemore, S.-J. (2020) · The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/s2352-4642(20)30186-3 · Cited by 1,383
Peer Relationships in Adolescence
Brown, B. B., & Larson, J. (2009) · Handbook of Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1002/9780470479193.adlpsy002004 · Cited by 1,208
The pandemic paradox: The consequences of COVID-19 on domestic violence
Bradbury‐Jones, C., & Isham, L. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/jocn.15296 · Cited by 1,165
Adolescents' Perceptions of Social Status: Development and Evaluation of a New Indicator
Goodman, E., Adler, N. E., Kawachi, I. I., Frazier, A. L., Huang, B., & Colditz, G. A. (2001) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.108.2.e31 · Cited by 1,118
Castagnoli, R., Votto, M., Licari, A., Brambilla, I., Bruno, R., Perlini, S., Rovida, F., Baldanti, F., & Marseglia, G. L. (2020) · JAMA Pediatrics · doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.1467 · Cited by 1,085
Reliability in content analysis: some common misconceptions and recommendations.
Krippendorff, K. (2004) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1093/hcr/30.3.411 · Cited by 1,027
Santoli, J. M., Lindley, M. C., DeSilva, M. B., Kharbanda, E. O., Daley, M. F., Galloway, L., Gee, J., Glover, M., Herring, B., Kang, Y., et al. (2020) · MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report · doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6919e2 · Cited by 701
Depression and anxiety among adolescents during COVID-19: A cross-sectional study
Chen, F., Zheng, D., Liu, J., Gong, Y., Guan, Z., & Lou, D. (2020) · Brain, Behavior, and Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2020.05.061 · Cited by 510
Developmental changes in the structure of the social brain in late childhood and adolescence
Mills, K. L., Lalonde, F., Clasen, L. S., Giedd, J. N., & Blakemore, S.-J. (2014) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nss113 · Cited by 452
Ecological disasters and mental Health: Causes, consequences, and interventions
Morganstein, J. C., & Ursano, R. J. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00001 · Cited by 327
Considering inequalities in the school closure response to COVID-19
Armitage, R., & Nellums, L. B. (2020) · The Lancet Global Health · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(20)30116-9 · Cited by 311
Revisiting Bias in Qualitative Research: Reflections on Its Relationship With Funding and Impact
Galdas, P. (2017) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/1609406917748992 · Cited by 299
Dutcher, E. G. (2012) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2012.04.009 · Cited by 245
Rich, M., & Ginsburg, K. R. (1999) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/s1054-139x(99)00068-3 · Cited by 179
Lau, N., O'Daffer, A., Colt, S., Yi-Frazier, J. P., Palermo, T. M., McCauley, E., & Rosenberg, A. R. (2020) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/17798 · Cited by 174
Golberstein, E., Gonzales, G., & Meara, E. R. (2019) · Health Economics · doi:10.1002/hec.3885 · Cited by 160
van der Aar, L. P. E., Peters, S., & Crone, E. A. (2018) · Cognitive Development · doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2018.10.001 · Cited by 77
Burnett Heyes, S., Jih, Y.-R., Block, P., Hiu, C.-F., Holmes, E. A., & Lau, J. Y. F. (2015) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.12396 · Cited by 62
Lipari, R. N., Hedden, S. L., Blau, G. M., & Rubenstein, L. V. (2016) · Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (US) eBooks · Cited by 41
Reflecting on experiences of social distancing
Carel, H., Ratcliffe, M., & Froese, T. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31485-9 · Cited by 37
Riblet, N. B. V., Stevens, S. P., Watts, B. V., & Shiner, B. R. (2020) · The Journal of Rural Health · doi:10.1111/jrh.12456 · Cited by 12
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Radha, 2020, E-Learning during lockdown of covid-19 pandemic, A Glob perspective, 13, 1088
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Review: Mental health impacts of the COVID‐19 pandemic on children and youth – a systematic review
Samji, H., Wu, J., Ladak, A., Vossen, C., Stewart, E., Dove, N., Long, D., & Snell, G. (2022) · Child and Adolescent Mental Health · doi:10.1111/camh.12501 · Cited by 953
Wilson, S., & Dumornay, N. M. (2022) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.12.003 · Cited by 166
McKinlay, A. R., May, T., Dawes, J., Fancourt, D., & Burton, A. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053676 · Cited by 115
Pelham, W. E., Tapert, S. F., Gonzalez, M. R., McCabe, C. J., Lisdahl, K. M., Alzueta, E., Baker, F. C., Breslin, F. J., Dick, A. S., Dowling, G. J., et al. (2021) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.06.015 · Cited by 95
Lessard, L. M., & Puhl, R. M. (2021) · School Psychology · doi:10.1037/spq0000443 · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Scott, S. R., Rivera, K. M., Rushing, E., Manczak, E. M., Rozek, C. S., & Doom, J. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Denver (US)
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Scott, Samantha R.
- Venue
- Journal of Adolescent Health
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-02
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 262-269
- ISSN
- 1054-139X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7867622
- OpenAlex
- W3113010480
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 31
- FWCI
- 12.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Adolescent Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Denver
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social impacts of COVID-19
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Keywords
- COVID-19 pandemic, adolescents, adolescent problems, mental health, physical health, school closures, distance education, social distancing, peer relationships, family, socio-economic problems, COVID-19 exposure, technology use, social connectedness
- MeSH terms
- Social Interaction, COVID-19, Adolescent, Family, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Students, Education, Distance, Friends, Qualitative Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-07, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-07 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
