Cited by 306Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and TestingChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Examination of the utility of the Beck Anxiety Inventory and its factors as a screener for anxiety disorders

Leyfer, Ovsanna T., Ruberg, Joshua L., Woodruff-Borden, Janet·2006·Journal of Anxiety Disorders

Abstract

The Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule (ADIS-IV) were administered to 193 adults at a major Midwestern university recruited from an anxiety research and treatment center. The BAI and its four factor scores were compared from individuals with a primary diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), specific or social phobia, panic disorder with or without agoraphobia, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), and no psychiatric diagnosis. The cut scores on the BAI and its factors, their sensitivity, specificity, as well as positive and negative predictive values were calculated for each group. The results of this study support previous findings that the strongest quality of the BAI is its ability to assess panic symptomatology. The present study also expands on this notion by establishing that the BAI can be used as an efficient screening tool for distinguishing between individuals with and without panic disorder.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.janxdis.2005.05.004

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leyfer, O. T., Ruberg, J. L., & Woodruff-Borden, J.
Affiliations
University of Louisville (US)
Corresponding author
Leyfer, Ovsanna T.
Venue
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
444-458
ISSN
0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2087701524
Cited by
305
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 16
FWCI
4.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
Beck Anxiety Inventory, panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder, specific phobia, obsessive-compulsive disorder, factor scores, diagnostic accuracy, cut-off values, sensitivity and specificity, predictive value
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anxiety Disorders, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Personality Inventory, Phobic Disorders, Sensitivity and Specificity, Severity of Illness Index, Midwestern United States, Multivariate Analysis, Case-Control Studies, Panic Disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review