Cited by 39Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

Health anxiety and attentional bias: The time course of vigilance and avoidance in light of pictorial illness information

Jasper, Fabian, Witthöft, Michael·2011·Journal of Anxiety Disorders

Abstract

Cognitive-behavioral models of health anxiety stress the importance of selective attention not only towards internal but also towards external health threat related stimuli. Yet, little is known about the time course of this attentional bias. The current study investigates threat related attentional bias in participants with varying degrees of health anxiety. Attentional bias was assessed using a visual dot-probe task with health-threat and neutral pictures at two exposure durations, 175ms and 500ms. A baseline condition was added to the dot-probe task to dissociate indices of vigilance towards threat and difficulties to disengage from threat. Substantial positive correlations of health anxiety, anxiety sensitivity, and absorption with difficulties to disengage from threat were detected at 500ms exposure time. At an early stage (i.e., at 175ms exposure time), we found significant positive correlations of health anxiety and absorption with orientation towards threat. Results suggest a vigilance avoidance pattern of selective attention associated with pictorial illness related stimuli in health anxiety.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.08.004

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Illness-related bias occurs in highly health-anxious individuals and patients with pathological HA, and describes the tendency to focus on information that confirms health worries and to ignore contradictory information.

    “It was found to occur in highly health-anxious individuals [97,98], as well as in patients with pathological HA [99-101] and describes the tendency to focus on information that confirms their health worries and to ignore information that is contradictory [58].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jasper, F., & Witthöft, M.
Affiliations
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
Corresponding author
Jasper, Fabian
Venue
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-12
Volume
25
Issue
8
Pages
1131-1138
ISSN
0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1993669159
Cited by
39
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
health anxiety, attentional bias, selective attention, threat-related stimuli, anxiety sensitivity, absorption, exposure duration, dot-probe task
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Attention, Attitude to Health, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review