Cited by 36Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Development of a scale to evaluate young children’s responses to uncertainty and low environmental structure

Sanchez, Amanda L., Cornacchio, Danielle, Chou, Tommy, Leyfer, Ovsanna, Coxe, Stefany, Pincus, Donna, Comer, Jonathan S.·2017·Journal of Anxiety Disorders

Abstract

Intolerance of Uncertainty (IU), defined as the dispositional interpretation of uncertain or ambiguous events as stressful and problematic, has been linked to excessive worry and other anxiety-related problems in adults and youth. IU has been conceptualized as a vulnerability factor for excessive worry and anxiety, but the historical absence of a supported measure of IU in young children has hampered longitudinal research needed to evaluate temporal relationships between IU and anxiety and the differential developmental pathways of IU leading to different anxiety disorders and depression. The present study evaluated the psychometric properties of a newly developed 17-item parent-report measure of younger children's Responses to Uncertainty and Low Environmental Structure (i.e., the RULES questionnaire). We examined the preliminary structure, reliability, and validity of the RULES within a treatment-seeking sample of children aged 3-10 (N=160) with anxiety. Findings from an exploratory factor analysis supported a one-factor model that retained all 17 items. The RULES demonstrated strong internal consistency, and predictive, convergent, and divergent validity. In this early childhood sample, the RULES also showed stronger associations with anxiety than did a previously supported measure of IU developed for older youth, and showed preliminary sensitivity to treatment-related change. Findings provide preliminary psychometric support for the RULES as a parent-report measure of children's responses to uncertainty and low environmental structure that may inform etiologic models of anxiety.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.janxdis.2016.11.006

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sanchez, A. L., Cornacchio, D., Chou, T., Leyfer, O., Coxe, S., Pincus, D., & Comer, J. S.
Affiliations
  • Florida International University (US)
  • Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Sanchez, Amanda L.
Venue
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-01
Volume
45
Pages
17-23
ISSN
0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2550491106
Cited by
36
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 2
FWCI
2.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH090247)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
intolerance of uncertainty, young children, anxiety, parent-report measures, psychometric properties, environmental structure, early childhood anxiety, causes of anxiety, scale development
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Child, Child, Preschool, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Personality, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Environment, Reproducibility of Results, Uncertainty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review