Cited by 162Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale for Children: A psychometric evaluation.

Open access
Comer, Jonathan S., Roy, Amy K., Furr, Jami M., Gotimer, Kristin, Beidas, Rinad S., Dugas, Michel J., Kendall, Philip C.·2009·Psychological Assessment

Abstract

Intolerance of uncertainty (IU) has contributed to our understanding of excessive worry and adult anxiety disorders, but there is a paucity of research on IU in child samples. This gap is due to the absence of a psychometrically sound measure of IU in youth. The present study adapted parallel child- and parent-report forms of the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale (IUS) and examined the internal consistency, convergent validity, and classification properties of these forms in youth aged 7-17 (M = 11.6 years, SD = 2.6). Participating youth (N = 197; 100 girls, 97 boys) either met diagnostic criteria for an anxiety disorder (n = 73) or were nonreferred community participants (n = 124). The child-report form (i.e., IUS for Children, or IUSC), and to a lesser extent the parent-report form, demonstrated strong internal consistency and convergent validity, evidenced by significant associations with anxiety and worry (and reassurance-seeking in the case of the child-report form). Children diagnosed with anxiety disorders scored higher than nonreferred community youth on both forms. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis demonstrated acceptable overall utility in distinguishing the 2 groups of youth. Findings provide preliminary support for use of the IUSC for continuous measurement of children's ability to tolerate uncertainty.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0016719

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 60 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. March JS Sullivan K 1999 Test-retest reliability of the Multi-dimensional Anxiety Scale for Children Journal of Anxiety Disorders 13 349 358 10504106

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Comer, J. S., Roy, A. K., Furr, J. M., Gotimer, K., Beidas, R. S., Dugas, M. J., & Kendall, P. C.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • New York University (US)
  • Temple University (US)
  • Concordia University (CA)
Venue
Psychological Assessment
Published
2009-09
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
402-411
ISSN
  • 1040-3590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-134X
OpenAlex
W2127088076
Cited by
162
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Fordham Research Commons (Fordham University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (T32 MH016434)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH074821)
  • American Psychological Association
  • Temple University
  • Mental Health Initiative
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
intolerance of uncertainty, children, anxiety disorders, excessive worry, reassurance seeking, internal consistency, convergent validity, psychometric assessment
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Anxiety Disorders, Child, Female, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Parents, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, ROC Curve, Self Disclosure, Reproducibility of Results, Uncertainty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review