Cited by 733CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringRNA Interference and Gene DeliveryRNA regulation and disease

Rapid and highly efficient mammalian cell engineering via Cas9 protein transfection

Open access
Liang, Xiquan, Potter, Jason, Kumar, Shantanu, Zou, Yanfei, Quintanilla, Rene, Sridharan, Mahalakshmi, Carte, Jason, Chen, Wen +4 more·2015·Journal of Biotechnology

Abstract

CRISPR-Cas9 systems provide a platform for high efficiency genome editing that are enabling innovative applications of mammalian cell engineering. However, the delivery of Cas9 and synthesis of guide RNA (gRNA) remain as steps that can limit overall efficiency and ease of use. Here we describe methods for rapid synthesis of gRNA and for delivery of Cas9 protein/gRNA ribonucleoprotein complexes (Cas9 RNPs) into a variety of mammalian cells through liposome-mediated transfection or electroporation. Using these methods, we report nuclease-mediated indel rates of up to 94% in Jurkat T cells and 87% in induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) for a single target. When we used this approach for multigene targeting in Jurkat cells we found that two-locus and three-locus indels were achieved in approximately 93% and 65% of the resulting isolated cell lines, respectively. Further, we found that the off-target cleavage rate is reduced using Cas9 protein when compared to plasmid DNA transfection. Taken together, we present a streamlined cell engineering workflow that enables gRNA design to analysis of edited cells in as little as four days and results in highly efficient genome modulation in hard-to-transfect cells. The reagent preparation and delivery to cells is amenable to high throughput, multiplexed genome-wide cell engineering.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2015.04.024

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Cho, S.W., Kim, S., Kim, J.M., Kim, J.S., 2013a. Targeted genome engineering in human cells with the Cas9 RNA-guided endonuclease. Nat. Biotechnol. 31 (3), 230-232.
  2. Cho, S.W., Lee, J., Carroll, D., Kim, J.S., 2013b. Heritable gene knockout in Caenorhab- ditis elegans by direct injection of cas9-sgRNA ribonucleoproteins. Genetics 195 (3), 1177-1180.
  3. Kabadi, A.M., Ousterout, D.G., Hilton, I.B., Gersbach, C.A., Oct 29 2014. Multiplex CRISPR/Cas9-based genome engineering from a single lentiviral vector. Nucleic Acids Res. 42 (19), e147, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku749 · DOI
  4. Mali, P., Yang, L., Esvelt, K.M., Aach, J., Guell, M., DiCarlo, J.E., Norville, J.E., Church, G.M., 2013. RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science 339 (6121), 823-826.
  5. Sakuma, T., Nishikawa, A., Kume, S., Chayama, K., Yamamoto, T., 2014. Multiplex genome engineering in human cells using all-in-one CRISPR/Cas9 vector system. Sci. Rep. 4 (June), 5400, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep05400 · DOI
  6. Sells, M.A., Li, J., Chernoff, J., 1995. Delivery of protein into cells using polycationic liposomes. Biotechniques 19 (1), 72-76, 78.
  7. Sung, Y.H., Kim, J.M., Kim, H.T., Lee, J., Jeon, J., Jin, Y., Choi, J.H., Ban, Y.H., Ha, S.J., Kim, C.H., et al., 2014. Highly efficient gene knockout in mice and zebrafish with RNA-guided endonucleases. Genome Res. 24 (1), 125-131.
  8. Tsai, S.Q., Wyvekens, N., Khayter, C., Foden, J.A., Thapar, V., Reyon, D., Goodwin, M.J., Aryee, M.J., Joung, J.K., 2014. Dimeric CRISPR RNA-guided FokI nucleases for highly specific genome editing. Nat. Biotechnol. 32 (6), 569-576.
  9. Zuris, J.A., Thompson, D.B., Shu, Y., Guilinger, J.P., Bessen, J.L., Hu, J.H., Maeder, M.L., Joung, J.K., Chen, Z.Y., Liu, D.R., 2015. Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of pro- teins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo. Nat. Biotechnol. 33 (1), 73-80.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liang, X., Potter, J., Kumar, S., Zou, Y., Quintanilla, R., Sridharan, M., Carte, J., Chen, W., Roark, N., Ranganathan, S., Ravinder, N., & Chesnut, J. D.
Affiliations
Thermo Fisher Scientific (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Potter, Jason
Venue
Journal of Biotechnology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-08
Volume
208
Pages
44-53
ISSN
0168-1656 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W333206344
Cited by
733
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 76 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 67 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 75 · 2019: 91 · 2018: 87 · 2017: 59 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
28.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biotechnology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
Keywords
CRISPR/Cas9, ribonucleoprotein complexes, genome editing, lipofection, electroporation, off-target cleavage, induced pluripotent stem cells, Jurkat cells
MeSH terms
Endonucleases, Humans, Transfection, Jurkat Cells, Cell Engineering, Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review