Cited by 489Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesBody Image and Dysmorphia StudiesPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Recurrent images and early memories in social phobia

Hackmann, Ann, Clark, David M., McManus, Freda·2000·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

A recent model [Clark, D. M. & Wells, A. (1995). A cognitive model of social phobia. In R. Heimberg, M. Liebowitz, D. A. Hope & F. R. Schneier (Eds.), Social phobia: diagnosis, assessment and treatment (pp. 69-93). New York: Guildford Press] suggests that a distorted image of one's public self lies at the heart of social phobia. A previous study of spontaneous imagery [Hackmann, A., Surawy, C. & Clark, D. M. (1998) Seeing yourself through others' eyes: a study of spontaneously occurring images in social phobia. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 26, 3-12] confirmed that patients with social phobia frequently report experiencing negative, distorted, observer-perspective images when in anxiety provoking social situations. In the present study, 22 patients with social phobia were given a semistructured interview which aimed to further explore the nature of social phobic imagery. All participants were able to identify negative spontaneous images that were recurrent in the sense that their content appeared to be relatively stable over time and across different feared social situations. Most recurrent images involved several sensory modalities. Most recurrent images were linked to memories of adverse social events that clustered in time around the onset of the disorder. Taken together, the results suggest that in patients with social phobia, early unpleasant experiences may lead to the development of excessively negative images of their social selves that are repeatedly activ…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0005-7967(99)00161-8

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hackmann, A., Clark, D. M., & McManus, F.
Affiliations
Warneford Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Hackmann, Ann
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-06
Volume
38
Issue
6
Pages
601-610
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1992748384
Cited by
489
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 28
FWCI
8.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
social anxiety disorder, spontaneous imagery, early memories, negative self-concept, sensory modalities, memory updating
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Cognition, Conditioning, Psychological, Eidetic Imagery, Female, Fluoxetine, Humans, Male, Memory, Periodicity, Phobic Disorders, Time Factors, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review