Cited by 203Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

General psychological acceptance and chronic pain: There is more to accept than the pain itself

McCracken, Lance M., Zhao‐O'Brien, Jane·2010·European Journal of Pain

Abstract

An increasing body of research demonstrates that acceptance of pain is significantly associated with the quality of daily functioning in people with chronic pain. The aim of the present study was to examine acceptance more broadly in relation to a wider range of undesirable experiences these people may encounter, such as other physical symptoms, experiences of emotional distress, or distressing thoughts. One hundred forty‐four, consecutive, adult patients attending interdisciplinary treatment for chronic pain participated in this study. They completed the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire‐II (AAQ‐II [Bond F, Hayes SC, Baer RA, Carpenter KM, Orcutt HK, Waltz T, Zettle RD. Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance Action Questionnaire‐II: a revised measure of psychological flexibility and acceptance, submitted for publication]), measuring their general psychological acceptance. They also completed measures of emotional, physical, and psychosocial functioning, pain acceptance, and mindfulness. The AAQ‐II achieved satisfactory internal consistency, α = .89, and factor analysis revealed a unitary factor structure. Primary results showed that general psychological acceptance significantly correlated with depression, r = −.69, pain‐related anxiety, r = −.59, physical disability, r = −.42, and psychosocial disability, r = −.65, all p < .001. Hierarchical regression analyses showed that general psychological acceptance added a significant increment of explained variance to the prediction of patient functioning, independent of patient background characteristics, pain, acceptance of pain, and mindfulness. These results suggest that, when people with chronic pain are willing to have undesirable psychological experiences without attempting to control them, they may function better and suffer less. General acceptance may have a unique role to play in the disability and suffering of chronic pain beyond similar processes such as acceptance of pain or mindfulness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejpain.2009.03.004

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both general and illness-specific psychological flexibility have correlations with psychological distress, with general measures explaining additional variance independent of illness-specific measures.

    “Both general and illness-specific psychological flexibility have correlations with psychological distress, with general measures explaining additional variance independent of illness-specific measures (McCracken & Zhao-O'Brien, 2010).”
  • The AAQ-II had a unitary factor structure in a sample of people seeking treatment for chronic pain.

    “Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) demonstrated that the AAQ-II had a unitary factor structure in this population as well.”

    From Further evaluation of the psychometric properties of the acceptance and action questionnaire-II (2012) · cites this paper as McCracken & Zhao-O'Brien, 2010

  • The AAQ-II showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = .89) and construct validity in a chronic pain sample.

    “The AAQ-II showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's 𝛂 = .89) and construct validity as it was associated with pain-related anxiety, depression, and mindfulness.”

    From Further evaluation of the psychometric properties of the acceptance and action questionnaire-II (2012) · cites this paper as McCracken & Zhao-O'Brien, 2010

  • McCracken and Zhao-O'Brien (2010) found that the AAQ-II added significant variance to the prediction of quality of daily patient functioning above and beyond acceptance of pain and general mindfulness.

    “McCracken and ZhaoO'Brien (2010) found that the AAQ-II added significant variance to the prediction of the quality of daily patient functioning above and beyond acceptance of pain and general mindfulness.”

    From Further evaluation of the psychometric properties of the acceptance and action questionnaire-II (2012) · cites this paper as McCracken & Zhao-O'Brien, 2010

  • This finding corroborates earlier research that showed that the AAQ-II had incremental validity beyond mindfulness in predicting chronic pain (McCracken & Zhao-O'Brien, 2010).

    “This finding corroborates earlier research that showed that the AAQ-II had incremental validity beyond mindfulness in predicting chronic pain (McCracken &amp; Zhao-O'Brien, 2010).”

    From Further evaluation of the psychometric properties of the acceptance and action questionnaire-II (2012) · cites this paper as McCracken & Zhao-O'Brien, 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCracken, L. M., & Zhao‐O'Brien, J.
Affiliations
Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases (GB)
Corresponding author
McCracken, Lance M.
Venue
European Journal of Pain
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-02
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
170-175
ISSN
  • 1090-3801 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2149
OpenAlex
W2107861151
Cited by
203
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 8
FWCI
12.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
chronic pain, Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II, psychological flexibility, pain acceptance, mindfulness, depression, pain-related anxiety, physical disability, psychosocial disability, daily functioning, multidisciplinary pain management, psychometric validation
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Anxiety, Attention, Awareness, Chronic Disease, Major Depressive Disorder, Disability Evaluation, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Neuropsychological Tests, Pain, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Social Behavior, Socioeconomic Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Sickness Impact Profile

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review