Cited by 45Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Psychological flexibility in depression relapse prevention: processes of change and positive mental health in group-based ACT for residual symptoms

Open access
Østergaard, Tom, Lundgren, Tobias, Zettle, Robert D., Landrø, Nils Inge, Haaland, Vegard Øksendal·2020·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

Relapse rates following a depressive episode are high, with limited treatments available aimed at reducing such risk. Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) is a cognitive-behavioral approach that has gained increased empirical support in treatment of depression, and thus represents an alternative in relapse prevention. Psychological flexibility (PF) plays an important role in mental health according to the model on which ACT is based. This study aimed to investigate the role of PF and its subprocesses in reducing residual symptoms of depression and in improving positive mental health following an 8-week group-based ACT treatment. Adult participants (75.7 % female) with a history of depression, but currently exhibiting residual symptoms (N = 106) completed measures before and after intervention, and at 6 and 12-month follow-up. A growth curve model showed that positive mental health increased over 12-months. Multilevel mediation modeling revealed that PF significantly mediated these changes as well as the reduction of depressive symptoms, and that processes of acceptance, cognitive defusion, values and committed action, in turn, mediated increased PF.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00528

Cites

99 of 99 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lower level of self-as-context is associated with more likely being troubled by negative emotions and experiences in daily life.

    “which was also consistent with previous studies (Godbee and Kangas, 2020; Østergaard et al., 2020), suggesting that the lower the level of self-as-context, the more likely the person is going to be troubled by various negative emotions and experiences in daily life.”

    From Measuring self-as-context in Chinese college students: Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of self-as-context scale (C-SACS) (2022) · cites this paper as Østergaard et al., 2020

    The Introduction (page unavailable) describes self-as-context as creating distance from negative self-identities and cites preliminary findings suggesting it supports mental health. It does not establish that people with lower self-as-context are more likely to be troubled by negative emotions and experiences in daily life. The Discussion (page unavailable) says the study did not measure self-as-context specifically. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In adults in remission, ACT was associated with lower residual depression after 12 months, mediated by increases in cognitive defusion and psychological flexibility; MBCT increased decentering and predicted lower residual depression after 6 months; MBCT and CBT improved decentering and reduced relapse over 24 months.

    “In a recent study with adults experiencing remission, ACT was associated with lower residual depression after 12 months and this was mediated by increases in cognitive defusion and psychological flexibility (40.77 ± 11.9 years)78.”

    From Decentering as a core component in the psychological treatment and prevention of youth anxiety and depression: a narrative review and insight report (2021) · cites this paper as [78]

    Split into 3 atoms — 2 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In adults seeking treatment for anxiety and depression, self-rated decentering increases following CBT, mindfulness-based interventions, and acceptance-based therapies.

    “In adults seeking treatment for anxiety and depression, medium-large increases in self-rated decentering are reported following CBT (d = 0.7–0.82) (~43 years)52,73, mindfulness-based interventions (d = 0.6–1.01) (34.49–53.30 years)26,52,74–76 and acceptance-based therapies (d = 0.32–1.85) (37.00–46.40 years)73,77–80.”

    From Decentering as a core component in the psychological treatment and prevention of youth anxiety and depression: a narrative review and insight report (2021) · cites this paper as [78]

    The Results (Overall Outcomes; page unavailable) report improved cognitive fusion and mindfulness measures after group-based ACT, but do not report self-rated decentering. Searches for “decentering” and the claimed effect-size range found no decentering measure or result in our copy; the paper also does not establish the claimed pattern across CBT, mindfulness-based interventions, and acceptance-based therapies. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 103 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Segal Z. V. Williams J. M. G. Teasdale J. D. (2002). Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Depression, First Edition: A New Approach to Preventing Relapse. New York, NY: Guilford Publications.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Østergaard, T., Lundgren, T., Zettle, R. D., Landrø, N. I., & Haaland, V. Ø.
Affiliations
  • University of Oslo (NO)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Wichita State University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Østergaard, Tom
  • Lundgren, Tobias
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2020-03-27
Volume
11
Pages
528-528
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3013642457
Cited by
45
References
103
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2
FWCI
2.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Holmes Museum Of Anthropology (Wichita State University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Duo Research Archive (University of Oslo) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Helse Sør-Øst RHF
  • Norges Forskningsråd
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
psychological flexibility, depression relapse prevention, acceptance and commitment therapy, residual depressive symptoms, positive mental health, group therapy, acceptance, cognitive defusion, change processes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review