Cited by 125Food Waste Reduction and SustainabilityEnvironmental Education and SustainabilityWaste Management and Recycling

Consumer perspectives on household food waste reduction campaigns

Open access
Kim, Jeawon, Rundle-Thiele, Sharyn, Knox, Kathy, Burke, Kirsty, Bogomolova, Svetlana·2020·Journal of Cleaner Production

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118608

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Poor kitchen skills or time devoted to making shopping items by individuals or restaurant attitudes toward portion size are among factors that predict food waste intention.

    “In this context, studies have shown that poor kitchen skills or time devoted to making shopping items by individuals or restaurant attitudes toward portion size are among factors that predict food waste intention [51-60].”
  • These consumers might not only be valuable for knowledge generation but might become direct contributors during the innovation process, especially in regard to incorporating their needs into new packaging designs.

    “Thus, these consumers might not only be valuable for knowledge generation but might become direct contributors during the innovation process, especially in regard to incorporating their needs into new packaging designs (see e.g.Kim et al., 2020).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, J., Rundle-Thiele, S., Knox, K., Burke, K., & Bogomolova, S.
Affiliations
  • Griffith University (AU)
  • University of South Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Kim, Jeawon
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
243
Pages
118608
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2974939930
Cited by
125
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 5
FWCI
10.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Waste Management and Recycling
Keywords
household food waste, customer perspective, co-design, social marketing, campaign targeting, fruit and vegetable waste, campaign effectiveness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review