Cited by 134Nanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryProtein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence AnalysisAdvanced Drug Delivery Systems

The potential of protein–nanomaterial interaction for advanced drug delivery

Peng, Qiang, Mu, Huiling·2016·Journal of Controlled Release

Abstract

Nanomaterials, like nanoparticles, micelles, nano-sheets, nanotubes and quantum dots, have great potentials in biomedical fields. However, their delivery is highly limited by the formation of protein corona upon interaction with endogenous proteins. This new identity, instead of nanomaterial itself, would be the real substance the organs and cells firstly encounter. Consequently, the behavior of nanomaterials in vivo is uncontrollable and some undesired effects may occur, like rapid clearance from blood stream; risk of capillary blockage; loss of targeting capacity; and potential toxicity. Therefore, protein-nanomaterial interaction is a great challenge for nanomaterial systems and should be inhibited. However, this interaction can also be used to functionalize nanomaterials by forming a selected protein corona. Unlike other decoration using exogenous molecules, nanomaterials functionalized by selected protein corona using endogenous proteins would have greater promise for clinical use. In this review, we aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of protein-nanomaterial interaction. Importantly, a discussion about how to use such interaction is launched and some possible applications of such interaction for advanced drug delivery are presented.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.01.041

Cites

126 of 126 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peng, Q., & Mu, H.
Affiliations
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Peng, Qiang
Venue
Journal of Controlled Release
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-03
Volume
225
Pages
121-132
ISSN
0168-3659 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2288574037
Cited by
134
References
126
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 7
FWCI
0.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Controlled Release (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (81402860)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
Keywords
nanoparticle-protein interactions, protein corona, drug delivery, nanoparticles, micelles, quantum dots, nanotubes, nanosheets, nanomaterial functionalization, endogenous proteins, nanoparticle clearance, targeting, toxicity
MeSH terms
Adsorption, Proteins, Drug Delivery Systems, Nanostructures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review