Cited by 144Ultrasound and Hyperthermia ApplicationsRNA Interference and Gene DeliveryBarrier Structure and Function Studies

Focused ultrasound/microbubbles-assisted BBB opening enhances LNP-mediated mRNA delivery to brain

Open access
Ogawa, Koki, Kato, Naoya, Yoshida, Michiharu, Hiu, Takeshi, Matsuo, Takayuki, Mizukami, Shusaku, Omata, Daiki, Suzuki, Ryo +3 more·2022·Journal of Controlled Release

Abstract

Messenger RNA (mRNA) medicine has become a new therapeutic approach owing to the progress in mRNA delivery technology, especially with lipid nanoparticles (LNP). However, mRNA encapsulated-LNP (mRNA-LNP) cannot spontaneously cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) which prevents the expression of foreign proteins in the brain. Microbubble-assisted focused ultrasound (FUS) BBB opening is an emerging technology that can transiently enhance BBB permeability. In this study, FUS/microbubble-assisted BBB opening was investigated for the intravenous delivery of mRNA-LNP to the brain. The intensity of FUS irradiation was optimized to 1.5 kW/cm 2, at which BBB opening occurred efficiently without hemorrhage or edema. Exogenous protein (luciferase) expression by mRNA-LNP, specifically at the FUS-irradiated side of the brain, occurred only when FUS and microbubbles were applied. This exogenous protein expression was faster but shorter than that of plasmid DNA delivery. Furthermore, foreign protein expression was observed in the microglia, along with CD31-positive endothelial cells, whereas no expression was observed in astrocytes or neurons. These results support the addition of mRNA-LNP to the lineup of nanoparticles delivered by BBB opening.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.05.042

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ogawa, K., Kato, N., Yoshida, M., Hiu, T., Matsuo, T., Mizukami, S., Omata, D., Suzuki, R., Maruyama, K., Mukai, H., & Kawakami, S.
Affiliations
  • Nagasaki University (JP)
  • Teikyo University (JP)
  • RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research (JP)
Corresponding author
Kawakami, Shigeru
Venue
Journal of Controlled Release
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-08
Volume
348
Pages
34-41
ISSN
0168-3659 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4281642562
Cited by
144
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 8
FWCI
7.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Controlled Release (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (JP21ak0101178)
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (21H03818)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
Keywords
focused ultrasound, microbubbles, blood-brain barrier opening, lipid nanoparticles, mRNA delivery, brain drug delivery, blood-brain barrier permeability, luciferase expression, microglia, endothelial cells, plasmid DNA delivery, intravenous delivery
MeSH terms
Animals, Blood-Brain Barrier, Brain, Liposomes, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, RNA, Messenger, Drug Delivery Systems, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Endothelial Cells, Microbubbles, Rats, Nanoparticles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review