Cited by 31Algal biology and biofuel productionThermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesCoal Combustion and Slurry Processing

New insights into the carbon neutrality of microalgae from culture to utilization: A critical review on the algae-based solid biofuels

Yang, Junhong, Zhao, Tong, Cui, Xuyang, Peng, Mengbo, Wang, Xintian, Mao, Huimin, Cui, Mianshan·2022·Biomass and Bioenergy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biombioe.2022.106599

Cites

129 of 129 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, J., Zhao, T., Cui, X., Peng, M., Wang, X., Mao, H., & Cui, M.
Affiliations
Tianjin University (CN)
Corresponding author
Yang, Junhong
Venue
Biomass and Bioenergy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-11
Volume
166
Pages
106599
ISSN
0961-9534 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4296903081
Cited by
31
References
129
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7
FWCI
1.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Biomass and Bioenergy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Coal Combustion and Slurry Processing
Keywords
microalgae, solid biofuels, carbon neutrality, co-combustion, combustion performance, energy consumption, microalgae cultivation, microalgae lipid content, coal combustion, sludge incineration, biomass combustion, species diversity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review