Cited by 173Face Recognition and PerceptionAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchWilliams Syndrome Research

A cross-syndrome study of the development of holistic face recognition in children with autism, Down syndrome, and Williams syndrome

Annaz, Dagmara, Karmiloff-Smith, Annette, Johnson, Mark H., Thomas, Michael S.C.·2009·Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

Abstract

We report a cross-syndrome comparison of the development of holistic processing in face recognition in school-aged children with developmental disorders: autism, Down syndrome, and Williams syndrome. The autism group was split into two groups: one with high-functioning children and one with low-functioning children. The latter group has rarely been studied in this context. The four disorder groups were compared with typically developing children. Cross-sectional trajectory analyses were used to compare development in a modified version of Tanaka and Farah's part-whole task. Trajectories were constructed linking part-whole performance either to chronological age or to several measures of mental age (receptive vocabulary, visuospatial construction, and the Benton Facial Recognition Test). In addition to variable delays in onset and rate of development, we found an atypical profile in all disorder groups. These profiles were atypical in different ways, indicating multiple pathways to, and variable outcomes in, the development of face recognition. We discuss the implications for theories of face recognition in both atypical and typical development, including the idea that part-whole and rotation manipulations may tap different aspects of holistic and/or configural processing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jecp.2008.11.005

Cites

106 of 106 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Annaz, D., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Johnson, M. H., & Thomas, M. S. C.
Affiliations
  • University of London (GB)
  • Birkbeck, University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Annaz, Dagmara
Venue
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-04
Volume
102
Issue
4
Pages
456-486
ISSN
0022-0965 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2133897619
Cited by
173
References
106
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 16
FWCI
8.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Child Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Williams Syndrome Research
Keywords
face recognition (cognition), holistic face processing, configural processing, autism spectrum disorder, Down syndrome, Williams syndrome, developmental disorders, children, developmental trajectories, mental age, high-functioning autism, low-functioning autism, receptive vocabulary, visuospatial construction
MeSH terms
Autistic Disorder, Child, Child, Preschool, Cognition Disorders, Down Syndrome, Face, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Visual Perception, Williams Syndrome, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review