The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Combating stereotype threat: The effect of self‐affirmation on women's intellectual performance
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Promisingly, lab studies demonstrate that affirmations can improve the performance of students working under the specter of a negative stereotype (Martens et al. 2006, Shapiro et al. 2012, Taylor & Walton 2011).”
From The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention (2014) · cites this paper as Martens et al. 2006
In the citing paper
“women in the diagnostic condition who completed a self-aYrmation-where they wrote about an important value unrelated to math or to their gender-performed as well as women in the no-threat condition and no diVerent from male college students.”
From The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory (2006) · cites this paper as Martens et al., 2006
In the citing paper
“Given the evidence that self-aYrmation appears to reduce stereotype threat among students in laboratory situations (Martens et al., 2006;Schimel et al., 2004)”
From The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory (2006) · cites this paper as Martens et al., 2006
Citations
Cites
Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans.
Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797 · Cited by 9,020
Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences
Kirk, R. (2013) · doi:10.4135/9781483384733 · Cited by 8,539
The Psychology of Self-Affirmation: Sustaining the Integrity of the Self
Steele, C. M. (1988) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60229-4 · Cited by 3,697
Stereotype Threat and Women's Math Performance
Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1006/jesp.1998.1373 · Cited by 3,435
Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma.
Crocker, J., & Major, B. (1989) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.96.4.608 · Cited by 3,426
Pattern and growth in personality
Allport, G. W. (1961) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,361
Mental Rotations, a Group Test of Three-Dimensional Spatial Visualization
Vandenberg, S. G., & Kuse, A. R. (1978) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.1978.47.2.599 · Cited by 2,620
Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat
Steele, C. M., Spencer, S. J., & Aronson, J. (2002) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(02)80009-0 · Cited by 2,201
The Approval Motive: Studies in Evaluative Dependence
Edwards, A. L., Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1965) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1420595 · Cited by 1,938
Aronson, J., Fried, C. B., & Good, C. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1006/jesp.2001.1491 · Cited by 1,889
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Schmader, 2002, Gender identification moderates stereotype threat, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 32
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory
Sherman, D. K., & Cohen, G. L. (2006) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(06)38004-5 · Cited by 1,614
“Given the evidence that self‐aYrmation appears to reduce stereotype threat among students in laboratory situations (Martens et al., 2006; Schimel et al., 2004), perhaps having students engage in aYrmation of non‐academic aspects of themselves in school settings could produce positive educational…”
BackgroundAn integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance
Schmader, T., Johns, M., & Forbes, C. (2008) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.115.2.336 · Cited by 1,576
Self-citationSocial-Psychological Interventions in Education: They’re Not Magic
Yeager, D. S., & Walton, G. M. (2011) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654311405999 · Cited by 1,345
The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention
Cohen, G. L., & Sherman, D. K. (2014) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115137 · Cited by 1,302
“Promisingly, lab studies demonstrate that affirmations can improve the performance of students working under the specter of a negative stereotype (Martens et al. 2006, Shapiro et al. 2012, Taylor & Walton 2011).”
BackgroundStout, J. G., Dasgupta, N., Hunsinger, M., & McManus, M. A. (2011) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0021385 · Cited by 1,050
Metadata
- Authors
- Martens, A., Johns, M., Greenberg, J., & Schimel, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Arizona (US)
- University of Alberta (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Martens, Andy
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 236-243
- ISSN
- 0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2030568963
- Cited by
- 460
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 35
- FWCI
- 24.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- UC Research Repository (University of Canterbury) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Keywords
- stereotype threat, self-affirmation, gender stereotypes, mathematics achievement, spatial ability, diagnosticity, gender differences in performance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
