Cited by 130Personality Traits and PsychologyEmotions and Moral BehaviorDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

Narcissistic defensiveness: hypervigilance and avoidance of worthlessness

Horvath, Stephan, Morf, Carolyn C.·2009·Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.07.011

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individual narcissists unconsciously engage in vigilant scanning for ego-threatening information, which they subsequently repress.

    “Experimental studies show that individual narcissists unconsciously engage in vigilant scanning for ego-threatening information, which they subsequently repress (Horvath & Morf, 2009).”
  • When primed with failure, narcissists tend to be faster than nonnarcissists in recognizing words associated with worthlessness.

    “Attesting to this, when primed with failure, narcissists tend to be faster than nonnarcissists in recognizing words associated with worthlessness—a finding suggestive of higher vigilance in encoding cues related to the loss of status (Horvath & Morf, 2009).”

    From The "Why" and "How" of Narcissism: A Process Model of Narcissistic Status Pursuit (2020) · cites this paper as Horvath & Morf, 2009

  • Vigilance has not been studied in relation to narcissism.

    “By contrast, despite theoretical propositions (e.g., Cisek et al., 2014) and indirect evidence (e.g., Horvath & Morf, 2009) vigilance has not been studied in relation to narcissism.”

    From The "Why" and "How" of Narcissism: A Process Model of Narcissistic Status Pursuit (2020) · cites this paper as Horvath & Morf, 2009

  • In a non-clinical sample, subjects with the highest levels of narcissism demonstrated hypervigilance for information conveying worthlessness, but were apparently unaware of this information.

    “Analogously, Horvath and Morf [31] found that in a non-clinical sample the subjects with the highest levels of narcissism demonstrated hypervigilance for information conveying worthlessness, but were also apparently unaware of this information.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Horvath, S., & Morf, C. C.
Affiliations
University of Bern (CH)
Corresponding author
Horvath, Stephan
Venue
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-11
Volume
45
Issue
6
Pages
1252-1258
ISSN
0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2116207427
Cited by
130
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
narcissism, worthlessness, hypervigilance, ego threat, self-regulation, automatic processes, grandiosity, priming, self-perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review