Cited by 27Personality Traits and PsychologyPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

The role of identity instability in the relationship between narcissism and emotional empathy.

Di Pierro, Rossella, Di Sarno, Marco, Preti, Emanuele, Di Mattei, Valentina E., Madeddu, Fabio·2018·Psychoanalytic Psychology

Abstract

Empirical literature has shown that narcissism is often associated with limited empathy, but the mechanism underlying this association is still unclear. The present study investigated the role of identity instability as a mediator of the relationship between narcissistic traits and empathic capabilities. Narcissistic traits, identity instability, and cognitive and emotional empathic capabilities were assessed among 462 nonclinical participants through self-report measures. Results showed a positive association between narcissistic traits and cognitive empathy. On the other hand, a negative association between narcissistic traits and emotional empathy emerged. Furthermore, the study showed that the association between narcissistic traits and impairments in emotional empathy was partially explained by identity instability. Results thus demonstrated that narcissistic traits were associated with higher identity instability, and this, in turn, was associated with decreased abilities to be emotionally involved in others' affect states. These findings are discussed in the context of an object relations formulation of narcissistic personality

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/pap0000159

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Significant associations between narcissistic features and identity instability have been established, with narcissism being linked with inflated but unstable representations of self.

    “More recently, significant associations between narcissistic features and identity instability have also been established, with narcissism being linked with inflated but unstable representations of self [19, 22, 65, 71].”
  • Exploitative people are more able at recognizing negative emotions because they look for vulnerability in others to find people to take advantage of and exploit.

    “Furthermore, exploitative people are more able at recognizing negative emotions because they look for vulnerability in others to find people to take advantage of and exploit (35).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Di Pierro, R., Di Sarno, M., Preti, E., Di Mattei, V. E., & Madeddu, F.
Affiliations
University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
Venue
Psychoanalytic Psychology
Published
2018-04
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
237-243
ISSN
  • 0736-9735 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1331
OpenAlex
W2766631569
Cited by
27
References
66
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2
FWCI
2.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychoanalytic Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
narcissism, identity instability, affective empathy, cognitive empathy, narcissistic personality, mediation, object relations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review