Cited by 67Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityCentral Venous Catheters and HemodialysisNeutropenia and Cancer Infections

Candidemia in cancer patients: Impact of early removal of non-tunneled central venous catheters on outcome

Liu, C.Y., Huang, L.J., Wang, W.S., Chen, T.L., Yen, C.C., Yang, M.H., Hsiao, L.T., Liu, C.Y. +2 more·2009·Journal of Infection

Abstract

Objective To explore the impact of retention of non-tunneled central venous catheters (CVCs) on survival in candidemic cancer patients, where CVCs are commonly used and essential. A second object was to determine whether early CVC removal would benefit a subset of cancer patients.Methods We retrospectively evaluated 92 cancer patients who had a single, non-tunneled CVC in place. Patients were grouped according to CVC retention or removal; the later group was subdivided into early (CVC removed <or=72h after candidemia onset) and late removal. A Cox regression model was used for determining risk factors of adverse outcome and Kaplan-Meier analyses for comparing in-hospital 3-30 day survival among subgroups.Results Baseline characteristics were comparable between CVC retention (n=20) or removal (n=72) groups. CVC retention was a significant risk factor of poor outcome, independent of other significant prognostic host factors (hazard ratio 7.15, 95% confidence interval 3.51-14.53, p<0.001). Patients of early CVC removal (n=40) had significant better survival than those of late removal (n=32) (p<0.001).Conclusion The results suggest that retention of CVCs has a negative impact on survival in candidemic cancer patients, and that early CVC removal should be considered in a subset of cancer patients with candidemia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jinf.2008.12.008

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Despite contradictory data from a post-hoc analysis of 2 clinical trials, it is generally accepted that indwelling CVCs should be removed as early as possible in all patients with candidemia.

    “Despite contradictory data from a post-hoc analysis of 2 clinical trials [98], it is generally accepted that indwelling CVCs should be removed as early as possible in all patients with candidemia [11,12,84,96].”

    From Treatment of Invasive Candidiasis: A Narrative Review (2018) · cites this paper as [96]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, C. Y., Huang, L. J., Wang, W. S., Chen, T. L., Yen, C. C., Yang, M. H., Hsiao, L. T., Liu, C. Y., Chen, P. M., & Chiou, T. J.
Affiliations
  • Taipei Veterans General Hospital (TW)
  • National Yang Ming University Hospital (TW)
Corresponding author
Chiou, T.J.
Venue
Journal of Infection
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-02
Volume
58
Issue
2
Pages
154-160
ISSN
0163-4453 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2032385343
Cited by
67
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 9
FWCI
4.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Infection (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Taipei Veterans General Hospital
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
Keywords
candidemia, catheter removal timing, catheter retention, cancer patients, survival, prognostic factors, fungemia
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Candida, Candidiasis, Catheterization, Central Venous, Female, Humans, Male, Neoplasms, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Survival Analysis, Fungemia, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review