Cited by 175Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityCentral Venous Catheters and HemodialysisNeutropenia and Cancer Infections

Should Vascular Catheters Be Removed from All Patients with Candidemia? An Evidence-Based Review

Nucci, M., Anaissie, E.·2002·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

The removal of all central venous catheters (CVCs) from all patients with candidemia is considered to be standard care. However, this practice is not always possible, and it is associated with significant cost and potential complications. To evaluate the effect of CVC removal on the outcome of patients with candidemia, a literature review was conducted that selected studies that evaluated CVC removal as a prognostic factor (of mortality) in candidemia, performed a multivariate analysis with odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals, and included a validated severity of illness score. Of 203 studies of candidemia, only 4 fulfilled these criteria. One study showed a benefit from CVC removal in a subset of 21 neutropenic patients; another study showed no benefit; and the remaining 2 studies showed a marginal benefit from this strategy. Although it is possible that removal of CVCs may reduce the rate of complications due to candidemia, including death, the findings of this literature review do not substantiate this consensus recommendation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/338714

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are no randomized studies of catheter removal for candidemia, and a recent exhaustive review demonstrates the limitations of the available data.

    “There are, however, no randomized studies of this topic, and a recent exhaustive review [119] clearly demonstrates the limitations of the available data.”

    From Guidelines for Treatment of Candidiasis (2004) · cites this paper as [119]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Nguyen MH, Peacock JE, Tanner DC, et al. Therapeutic approaches in patients with candidemia. Arch Intern Med 1995; 155:2429-35.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nucci, M., & Anaissie, E.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
  • University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
Corresponding author
Anaissie, E.
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2002-03-01
Volume
34
Issue
5
Pages
591-599
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W2097503946
Cited by
175
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 13
FWCI
11.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
Keywords
candidemia, central venous catheter removal, catheter-related bloodstream infection, mortality, prognostic factors, neutropenic patients, fungemia, disease severity index
MeSH terms
Candidiasis, Catheters, Indwelling, Humans, Multivariate Analysis, Odds Ratio, Prosthesis-Related Infections, Evidence-Based Medicine, Device Removal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review