Cited by 178Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityInfective Endocarditis Diagnosis and ManagementFungal Infections and Studies

Risk factors for death in patients with candidemia

Nucci, Marcio, Colombo, Arnaldo L., Silveira, Fernanda, Richtmann, Rosana, Salomão, Reinaldo, Branchini, Maria Luiza, Spector, Nelson·1998·Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology

Abstract

Objective: To analyze possible risk factors for death among patients with nosocomial candidemia. To identify risk factors for death in patients with candidemia, we analyzed demographic, clinical, and microbiological data. Setting: Six tertiary hospitals in Brazil. Patients: A cohort of 145 patients with candidemia. Design: 26 possible risk factors for death, including age, underlying disease, signs of deep-seated infection, neutropenia, number of positive blood cultures, removal of a central venous catheter, etiologic agent of the candidemia, susceptibility pattern of the isolate to amphotericin B, and antifungal treatment were evaluated by univariate stepwise logistic regression analysis. Results: Non- albicans species accounted for 63.4% of the candidemias. Risk factors for death in univariate analysis were older age, catheter retention, poor performance status, candidemia due to species other than Candida parapsilosis , hypotension, candidemia due to species other than Candida parapsilosis , and no antifungal treatment. In multivariate analysis, older age and non-removal of a central venous catheter were the only factors associated with an increased risk for death. Conclusions: These data suggest that patients with candidemia and a central venous catheter should have the catheter removed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/647743

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Venous catheter infection and IC guidelines, including the current IDSA guidelines, recommend removal of any intravascular catheter that is positive for a fungal pathogen (i.e., Candida) based on evidence from large retrospective and observational studies.

    “Venous catheter infection and IC guidelines, including the current IDSA guidelines, recommend removal of any intravascular catheter that is positive for a fungal pathogen (ie, Candida) based on evidence from large retrospective and observational studies.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nucci, M., Colombo, A. L., Silveira, F., Richtmann, R., Salomão, R., Branchini, M. L., & Spector, N.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
  • Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
  • Universidade Estadual de Campinas
Venue
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
Published
1998-11
Volume
19
Issue
11
Pages
846-850
ISSN
  • 0899-823X (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-6834
OpenAlex
W1990685201
Cited by
178
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
FWCI
5.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
Keywords
candidemia, nosocomial candidemia, mortality risk factors, central venous catheters, catheter removal, Candida parapsilosis, non-albicans Candida, age, antifungal therapy, amphotericin B susceptibility, neutropenia, hypotension
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Brazil, Candidiasis, Child, Child, Preschool, Cross Infection, Female, Hospitals, Public, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review