Cited by 159Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityCentral Venous Catheters and HemodialysisNeutropenia and Cancer Infections

Management of central venous catheters in patients with cancer and candidemia

Raad, Issam, Hanna, Hend, Boktour, Maha, Girgawy, Essam, Danawi, Hadi, Mardani, Masoud, Kontoyiannis, Dimitrios, Darouiche, Rabih +2 more·2004·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

To determine the need and appropriate timing of catheter removal in patients with candidemia, the records for 404 patients with cancer and central venous catheters (CVCs) who developed candidemia during the period of 1993-1998 were retrospectively reviewed. Of the total 404 cases of candidemia, 241 (60%) were due to a primary source, 111 (27%) were catheter related, and 52 (13%) were secondary cases of candidemia caused by a source other than the catheter. Multivariate analysis showed that catheter removal < or =72 h after onset improved response to antifungal therapy exclusively in patients with catheter-related candidemia (P=.04). Clinical characteristics that suggested a noncatheter source for the candidemia were disseminated infection (P<.01), previous chemotherapy (P<.01), previous corticosteroid therapy (P=.02), and poor response to antifungal therapy (P<.03). CVC removal < or =72 h after onset should be considered in patients with suspected catheter-related candidemia who have no evidence of dissemination, recent corticosteroid therapy, or chemotherapy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/382874

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Venous catheter infection and IC guidelines, including the current IDSA guidelines, recommend removal of any intravascular catheter that is positive for a fungal pathogen (i.e., Candida) based on evidence from large retrospective and observational studies.

    “Venous catheter infection and IC guidelines, including the current IDSA guidelines, recommend removal of any intravascular catheter that is positive for a fungal pathogen (ie, Candida) based on evidence from large retrospective and observational studies.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Raad, I., Hanna, H., Boktour, M., Girgawy, E., Danawi, H., Mardani, M., Kontoyiannis, D., Darouiche, R., Hachem, R., & Bodey, G. P.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2004-04-15
Volume
38
Issue
8
Pages
1119-1127
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W2141022761
Cited by
159
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
FWCI
5.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
Keywords
central venous catheters, candidemia, catheter-related candidemia, catheter removal timing, cancer patients, antifungal therapy response, systemic candidiasis, corticosteroid therapy, chemotherapy, catheter-related bloodstream infection
MeSH terms
Candidiasis, Catheterization, Central Venous, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Retrospective Studies, Multivariate Analysis, Prosthesis-Related Infections, Fungemia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review