Cited by 257Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchPain Management and Opioid UsePain Mechanisms and Treatments

Efficacy of Dronabinol as an Adjuvant Treatment for Chronic Pain Patients on Opioid Therapy

Open access
Narang, Sanjeet, Gibson, Daniel, Wasan, Ajay D., Ross, Edgar L., Michna, Edward, Nedeljkovic, Srdjan S., Jamison, Robert N.·2008·The Journal of Pain

Abstract

Unlabelled We assessed the efficacy of dronabinol (Marinol capsules; Solvay Pharmaceuticals, Brussels, Belgium), a synthetic Delta(9)-THC (tetrahydrocannabinol), in 30 patients taking opioids for chronic pain to determine its potential analgesic effects as an adjuvant treatment. Phase I of this 2-phase study was a randomized, single-dose, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover trial in which subjects were randomly administered either 10 mg or 20 mg of dronabinol or identical placebo capsules over the course of three, 8-hour visits. Baseline self-report measures, hourly ratings of pain intensity, pain relief, pain bothersomeness, treatment satisfaction, mood, side effects, and blood serum levels were obtained. Phase II was an extended open-label titrated trial of dronabinol as add-on medication to patients on stable doses of opioids. Results of the Phase I study showed that patients who received dronabinol experienced decreased pain intensity and increased satisfaction compared with placebo. No differences in benefit were found between the 20 mg and 10 mg doses. In the Phase II trial, titrated dronabinol contributed to significant relief of pain, reduced pain bothersomeness, and increased satisfaction compared with baseline. The incidence of side effects was dose-related. Overall, the use of dronabinol was found to result in additional analgesia among patients taking opioids for chronic noncancer pain.Perspective This study examines the effect of adding a cannabinoid to the regimen of patients with chronic pain who report significant pain despite taking stable doses of opioids. The results of our preliminary study suggest that dronabinol, a synthetic THC, may have an additive effect on pain relief.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpain.2007.10.018

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a phase I and phase II study, THC as an adjunct to opioid therapy for chronic pain enhanced pain relief in patients under an opioid therapeutic regimen.

    “A phase I, and phase II study examining the efficacy of THC as an adjunct to opioid therapy for the treatment of chronic pain showed that THC enhanced pain relief in patients under opioid therapeutic regimen (Narang et al, 2008).”
  • Patients reported improvements in sleep problems and disturbances while experiencing an increase in sleep adequacy in the open-label phase of the study.

    “Patients additionally reported improvements in sleep problems and disturbances while experiencing an increase in sleep adequacy in the open-label phase of the study.168”
  • Oral dronabinol produced significant pain relief versus placebo when combined with opioid therapy in both a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover phase and a subsequent open-label extension.

    “Oral dronanbinol produced significant pain relief versus placebo when combined with opioid therapy in both a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover phase and a subsequent open-label extension.168”
  • Side effects such as nausea, drowsiness, and dizziness are more frequent with higher doses of cannabinoids.

    “Side effects such as nausea, drowsiness, and dizziness are more frequent with higher doses of cannabinoids (Narang et al, 2008;Portenoy et al, 2012).”

    From Opioid-Sparing Effect of Cannabinoids: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2017) · cites this paper as Narang et al, 2008

  • In Narang 2008, in single-dose studies, 10 and 20 mg dronabinol significantly increased the amount of analgesic relief reported compared to placebo; TOTPAR was 31.1 in the placebo group, compared with 39.7 with dronabinol 10 mg and 41.7 with dronabinol 20 mg.

    “In single-dose studies, 10 and 20 mg dronabinol significantly increased the amount of analgesic relief reported compared to placebo”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Narang, S., Gibson, D., Wasan, A. D., Ross, E. L., Michna, E., Nedeljkovic, S. S., & Jamison, R. N.
Affiliations
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Venue
The Journal of Pain
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-03
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
254-264
ISSN
1526-5900 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2089180001
Cited by
257
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 16
FWCI
4.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
dronabinol, chronic non-cancer pain, opioid analgesics, adjuvant analgesia, tetrahydrocannabinol, cannabinoids, analgesia, pain intensity, treatment satisfaction, dose-response relationship, adverse effects
MeSH terms
Adjuvants, Pharmaceutic, Adult, Aged, Analgesics, Opioid, Chronic Disease, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Pain Measurement, Dronabinol, Cross-Over Studies, Analgesics, Non-Narcotic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review