Cited by 59Cancer survivorship and careAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Type D, anxiety and depression in association with quality of life in patients with Parkinson’s disease and patients with multiple sclerosis

Dubayova, Tatiana, Krokavcova, Martina, Nagyova, Iveta, Rosenberger, Jaroslav, Gdovinova, Zuzana, Middel, Berrie, Groothoff, Johan W., van Dijk, Jitse P.·2013·Quality of Life Research

Abstract

Purpose The present study examines the role of Type D personality, anxiety and depression in quality of life (QoL) in patients with two chronic neurological diseases--Parkinson's disease (PD) and multiple sclerosis (MS).Methods This cross-sectional study included 142 PD patients (73 % males; mean age 67.6 ± 9.2 years) and 198 patients with MS (32.3 % males; 38.4 ± 10.8 years). Multiple regression analyses were used to analyze the association of UDPRS (PD patients) or EDSS (MS patients), Type D personality (DS-14) and anxiety and depression (HADS) with the physical (PCS) and mental summary (MCS) of QoL, as measured by the SF-36.Results In PD patients, Type D was significantly associated with MCS only; in MS patients, Type D was significantly associated with both dimensions--MCS and PCS. After adding anxiety and depression, the importance of Type D for the QoL model dramatically decreased. Anxiety and depression were strongly associated with lower scores in MCS and PCS in both PD and MS patients.Conclusions The actual mood of PD and MS patients--the level of anxiety or depression--might have a greater impact on patients' QoL than their personality. Further longitudinal research should focus on how the pathway consisting of personality traits, anxiety and depression, and QoL might be constructed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11136-012-0257-9

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dubayova, T., Krokavcova, M., Nagyova, I., Rosenberger, J., Gdovinova, Z., Middel, B., Groothoff, J. W., & van Dijk, J. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Pavol Jozef Šafárik (SK)
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
Venue
Quality of Life Research
Published
2012-10-11
Volume
22
Issue
6
Pages
1353-1360
ISSN
  • 0962-9343 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2649
OpenAlex
W2095785417
Cited by
59
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 2
FWCI
2.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Quality of Life Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
Type D personality, anxiety, depression, quality of life, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, chronic neurological disease, personality traits, mood
MeSH terms
Affect, Aged, Anxiety, California, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson Disease, Quality of Life, Regression Analysis, Type D Personality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review