Cited by 266Cancer Treatment and PharmacologyCannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchPain Mechanisms and Treatments

A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Pilot Trial With Extension Using an Oral Mucosal Cannabinoid Extract for Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Neuropathic Pain

Open access
Lynch, Mary E., Cesar-Rittenberg, Paula, Hohmann, Andrea G.·2014·Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

Abstract

Context Neuropathic pain caused by chemotherapy limits dosing and duration of potentially life-saving anti-cancer treatment and impairs quality of life. Chemotherapeutic neuropathy responds poorly to conventional treatments, and there is an urgent medical need for new treatments. Recent preclinical studies demonstrate that cannabinoid agonists suppress established chemotherapy-evoked neuropathy.Objectives This was a pilot trial to begin to investigate a currently available cannabinoid agent, nabiximols (oral mucosal spray containing cannabinoids), in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain.Methods A randomized, placebo-controlled crossover pilot study was done in 16 patients with established chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain. A 0-10 point numeric rating scale for pain intensity (NRS-PI) was used as the primary outcome measure.Results When examining the whole group, there was no statistically significant difference between the treatment and the placebo groups on the NRS-PI. A responder analysis demonstrated that there were five participants who reported a two-point or greater reduction in pain that trended toward statistical significance and the number needed to treat was five.Conclusion Chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain is particularly resistant to currently available treatments. This pilot trial found a number needed to treat of five and an average decrease of 2.6 on an 11-point NRS-PI in five "responders" (as compared with a decrease of 0.6 with placebo) and supports that it is worthwhile to study nabiximols in a full randomized, placebo-controlled trial of chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.02.018

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a pilot study of chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain, no statistically significant difference in pain scores was found in the oromucosal-treated group compared to placebo, although five of 16 participants reported a 2-point grade reduction of pain score.

    “In a pilot study of chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain, no statistically significant difference in pain scores was found in the oromucosal-treated group, as compared to the placebo group, although five of the 16 participants reported a 2-point grade reduction of pain score (Lynch et al, 2014).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Rahn EJ, Makriyannis A, Hohmann AG. Activa- tion of cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptors sup- presses neuropathic nociception evoked by the chemotherapeutic agent vincristine in rats. Br J Pharmacol 2007;152:765e777.
  2. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36). Med Care 1992; 30:473e483.
  3. Squire P, Marchand S, Ware M. Using quantita- tive sensory testing (QST) in chronic pain evalua- tion: from research to clinical practice. Pain Res Manag 2008;13:125.
  4. Finnerup NB, Sindrup SH, Jensen TS. The evi- dence for pharmacological treatment of neuro- pathic pain. Pain 2010;150:573e581.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lynch, M. E., Cesar-Rittenberg, P., & Hohmann, A. G.
Affiliations
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Corresponding author
Lynch, Mary E.
Venue
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-01
Volume
47
Issue
1
Pages
166-173
ISSN
0885-3924 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2083316585
Cited by
266
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 1
FWCI
5.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pain and Symptom Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • GW Pharmaceuticals
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (RC1DA028200)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain, nabiximols, cannabinoid receptor agonists, chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, pain intensity, number needed to treat
MeSH terms
Analgesics, Antineoplastic Agents, Cannabidiol, Double-Blind Method, Drug Combinations, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuralgia, Pain Measurement, Pilot Projects, Dronabinol, Treatment Outcome, Cross-Over Studies, Oral Sprays

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review