Cited by 79Pain Management and Placebo EffectPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsTreatment of Major Depression

Contribution of spontaneous improvement to placebo response in depression: A meta-analytic review

Open access
Rutherford, Bret R., Mori, Shoko, Sneed, Joel R., Pimontel, Monique A., Roose, Steven P.·2012·Journal of Psychiatric Research

Abstract

Objectives It is unknown to what degree spontaneous improvement accounts for the large placebo response observed in antidepressant trials for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). The purpose of this study was to estimate the spontaneous improvement observed in treatment-seeking individuals with acute MDD by determining the symptom change in depressed patients assigned to wait-list controls in psychotherapy studies.Method The databases PubMed and PsycINFO were searched to identify randomized, prospective studies randomizing outpatients to psychotherapy or a wait-list control condition for the treatment of acute MDD. Standardized effect sizes calculated from each identified study were aggregated in a meta-analysis to obtain a summary statistic for the change in depression scores during participation in a wait-list control.Results Ten trials enrolling 340 participants in wait-list control conditions were identified. The estimated effect size for the change in depression scores during wait-list control was 0.505 (95% CI 0.271-0.739, p < 0.001), representing an average improvement of 4 points on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression.Discussion Depressed patients acutely experience improvement even without treatment, but spontaneous improvement is unlikely to account for the magnitude of placebo response typically observed in antidepressant trials. These findings must be interpreted in light of the small number wait-list control participants available for analysis as well as certain methodological heterogeneity in the psychotherapy studies analyzed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.02.008

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Tasman A Kay J Lieberman JA First MB Maj M Psychiatry 2008 3rd ed. Wiley

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rutherford, B. R., Mori, S., Sneed, J. R., Pimontel, M. A., & Roose, S. P.
Affiliations
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
  • Queens College, CUNY (US)
Corresponding author
Rutherford, Bret R.
Venue
Journal of Psychiatric Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-06
Volume
46
Issue
6
Pages
697-702
ISSN
0022-3956 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2169130856
Cited by
79
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Hope for Depression Research Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R21MH087774, K23MH075006, K23MH085236, T32MH015144)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
spontaneous improvement, placebo response, major depressive disorder, waitlist control, psychotherapy, antidepressant trials, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, treatment-seeking patients, symptom change
MeSH terms
Antidepressive Agents, Depression, Humans, Placebo Effect, Databases, Bibliographic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review