Cited by 553Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Efficacy of interpersonal psychotherapy for depressed adolescents

Mufson, L.·1999·Archives of General Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Psychotherapy is widely used for depressed adolescents, but evidence supporting its efficacy is sparse. METHODS: In a controlled, 12-week, clinical trial of Interpersonal Psychotherapy for Depressed Adolescents (IPT-A), 48 clinic-referred adolescents (aged 12-18 years) who met the criteria for DSM-III-R major depressive disorder were randomly assigned to either weekly IPT-A or clinical monitoring. Patients were seen biweekly by a "blind" independent evaluator to assess their symptoms, social functioning, and social problem-solving skills. Thirty-two of the 48 patients completed the protocol (21 IPT-A-assigned patients and 11 patients in the control group). RESULTS: Patients who received IPT-A reported a notably greater decrease in depressive symptoms and greater improvement in overall social functioning, functioning with friends, and specific problem-solving skills. In the intent-to-treat sample, 18 (75%) of 24 patients who received IPT-A compared with 11 patients (46%) in the control condition met recovery criterion (Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression score < or =6) at week 12. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary findings support the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of 12 weeks of IPT-A in acutely depressed adolescents in reducing depressive symptoms and improving social functioning and interpersonal problem-solving skills. Because it is a small sample consisting largely of Latino, low socioeconomic status adolescents, further studies must be conducted with other adolescent populations to confirm the generalizability of the findings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archpsyc.56.6.573

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mufson, L.
Affiliations
New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Mufson, L.
Venue
Archives of General Psychiatry
Published
1999-06-01
Volume
56
Issue
6
Pages
573-579
ISSN
0003-990X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2158366999
Cited by
552
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 28
FWCI
23.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of General Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1r01mh043873-01, 5r29mh048715-05)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH43873-09, MH48715)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
interpersonal psychotherapy, adolescent depression, major depressive disorder, social functioning, interpersonal problem-solving skills, depressive symptom reduction, treatment efficacy, Latino adolescents
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Age Factors, Child, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Patient Dropouts, Problem Solving, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotherapy, Research Design, Social Adjustment, Social Class, Treatment Outcome, Patient Selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review