Cited by 41Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsDigital Mental Health InterventionsStress and Burnout Research

Use of mobile apps and online programs of mindfulness and self-compassion training in workers: a scoping review

Open access
Bégin, Catherine, Berthod, Jeanne, Martinez, Lizette Zamora, Truchon, Manon·2022·Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science

Abstract

Mindfulness and self-compassion interventions are two strategies helpful in preventing and reducing burnout and work stress. However, professionals with overburdened schedules can experience obstacles in learning and practicing these interventions, originally taught with lengthy programs. The use of digital technologies could make these interventions more accessible to workers, as studied in a recent, growing body of evidence. The evidence available is diverse in terms of interventions, designs, outcomes, and populations. This calls for a review that can take into consideration this diversity while still rigorously synthesize it. Scoping reviews are designed to examine emerging evidence and summarize the evidence on a specific topic of interest. The present scoping review aims to assess the current state of the literature on the use of online programs and mobile applications of self-compassion, mindfulness, and meditation (digital mindfulness-based interventions; dMBIs) by workers. More specifically, information on the type of intervention, population, advantages, and disadvantages, measured outcomes, and advice for future research are gathered. MEDLINE (PubMed; Ovid), PsychInfo (Ovid), and Web of Science (Clarivate) were searched to identify all relevant articles. The screening process resulted in 56 articles being included in this scoping review. Inclusion criteria were (1) participants are workers; (2) the intervention is individual, digital, and mindfulness/self-compassion/meditation-based; and (3) articles were available in French or English language at the time of the review. Interventions used were mostly mindfulness-based, equally categorized under web-based and app-based interventions. Most interventions included information on mindfulness, meditation or self-compassion, meditation exercises, other types of exercises, instructions on how to use, and reminders. dMBIs are often studied in the healthcare population and predominantly in female samples. Although dMBIs present advantages (low cost, accessibility, practicality, feasibility), obstacles can arise in their implementation (low engagement and motivation, concerns about confidentiality). Included articles measured outcomes related to work, mindfulness or self-compassion, and other psychological variables (stress/anxiety, depression, resilience, wellbeing). Articles provided important directions to further research on dMBIs regarding methodological aspects, modality and intervention, and individual and organizational questions. dMBIs are becoming more popular and interventions are diverse. Although not without limitations, this scoping provided a synthesis on different aspects of the use of dMBIs within workers and highlighted pertinent future research directions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s41347-022-00267-1

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Kopencey, S. M. (2017). Effects of a mindfulness-based mobile application on empathy and mindfulness with psychotherapists [Antioch University]. http://ezproxy.auckland.ac.nz/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/2031587120?accountid=8424 https://openurl.auckland.ac.nz/resolve?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&genre=dissertations+%26+theses&sid=ProQ:ProQuest
  2. Neff KD Knox MC Long P Gregory K Caring for others without losing yourself: An adaptation of the Mindful Self-Compassion Program for Healthcare Communities Journal of Clinical Psychology 2020 76 9 1543 1562 10.1002/jclp.23007 32627192 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bégin, C., Berthod, J., Martinez, L. Z., & Truchon, M.
Affiliations
Université Laval (CA)
Corresponding author
Bégin, Catherine
Venue
Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science
Published
2022-09-06
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
477-515
ISSN
2366-5963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4295507563
Cited by
41
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Université Laval
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
Keywords
mobile application, online programs, self-compassion, mindfulness, meditation, workers, burnout, occupational stress, employee well-being, user engagement, confidentiality concerns, healthcare workers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review