Tweets, Apps, and Pods: Results of the 6-Month Mobile Pounds Off Digitally (Mobile POD) Randomized Weight-Loss Intervention Among Adults
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Previous interventions have shown promising results using theory-based podcasts to deliver a behavioral weight-loss intervention. OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to examine whether a combination of podcasting, mobile support communication, and mobile diet monitoring can assist people in weight loss. METHODS: In this 6-month, minimal contact intervention, overweight (n = 96, body mass index 32.6 kg/m(2)) adults were recruited through television advertisements and email listservs and randomly assigned to Podcast-only or Podcast+Mobile groups. Both groups received 2 podcasts per week for 3 months and 2 minipodcasts per week for months 3-6. In addition to the podcasts, the Podcast+Mobile group was also instructed to use a diet and physical activity monitoring application (app) on their mobile device and to interact with study counselors and other participants on Twitter. RESULTS: Weight loss did not differ by group at 6 months: mean -2.7% (SD 5.6%) Podcast+Mobile, n = 47; mean -2.7% (SD 5.1%) Podcast, n = 49; P = .98. Days/week of reported diet monitoring did not differ between Podcast+Mobile (mean 2.3, SD 1.9 days/week) and Podcast groups (mean 1.9, SD 1.7 days/week; P = .28) but method of monitoring did differ. Podcast+Mobile participants were 3.5 times more likely than the Podcast group to use an app to monitor diet (P = .01), whereas the majority of Podcast participants reported using the Web (14/41, 34%) or paper (12/41, 29%). There were more downloads per episode in the Podcast+Mobile group (1.4/person) than in the Podcast group (1.1/person; P < .001). The number of podcasts participants reported downloading over the 6-month period was significantly moderately correlated with weight loss in both the Podcast+Mobile (r = -.46, P = .001) and the Podcast (r = -.53, P < .001) groups. Podcast+Mobile participants felt more user control at 3 months (P = .02), but not at 6 months, and there was a trend (P = .06) toward greater elaboration among Podcast+Mobile participants. There were significant differences in reported source of social support between groups. More Podcast participants relied on friends (11/40, 28% vs 4/40, 10%; P = .045) whereas Podcast+Mobile participants relied on online sources (10/40, 25% vs 0/40; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Results confirm and extend previous findings showing a minimally intensive weight-loss intervention can be delivered via podcast, but prompting and mobile communication via Twitter and monitoring app without feedback did not enhance weight loss. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01139255; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01139255 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/625OjhiDy).
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In a 6-month randomized trial among 96 overweight/obese adults, a podcast-only weight-loss intervention produced modest weight loss, and adding a mobile diet-monitoring app plus Twitter prompts/support did not improve weight loss. Both groups lost a mean 2.7% of body weight at 6 months (P = .98 between groups).
Key findings
Weight loss did not differ by group at 6 months: mean –2.7% (SD 5.6%) Podcast+Mobile, n = 47; mean –2.7% (SD 5.1%) Podcast, n = 49; P = .98. Most participants did not achieve a 5% weight loss, the level described as clinically meaningful.
- Days/week of reported diet monitoring did not differ between Podcast+Mobile (mean 2.3, SD 1.9) and Podcast groups (mean 1.9, SD 1.7; P = .28), but method of monitoring did: Podcast+Mobile participants were 3.5 times more likely to use an app to monitor diet (P = .01), whereas most Podcast participants used the Web (14/41, 34%) or paper (12/41, 29%).
- Podcast downloads were higher in the Podcast+Mobile group (1.4/person vs 1.1/person; P < .001), and reported number of podcasts downloaded over 6 months was moderately correlated with weight loss in both Podcast+Mobile (r = –.46, P = .001) and Podcast (r = –.53, P < .001) groups.
- Social support source differed: more Podcast participants relied on friends (11/40, 28% vs 4/40, 10%; P = .045), while more Podcast+Mobile participants relied on online sources (10/40, 25% vs 0/40; P = .001). Podcast+Mobile participants felt more user control at 3 months (P = .02), but not at 6 months, and there was a trend toward greater elaboration at 6 months (P = .06).
Methods
Six-month minimal-contact randomized trial; overweight/obese adults (BMI 25–45 kg/m2, 18–60 years) were recruited in Raleigh-Durham, North Carolina, via television advertisements and email listservs, required an Internet-capable mobile device, and were randomized to Podcast-only (n = 49) or Podcast+Mobile (n = 47). Both groups received 2 podcasts/week for 3 months and 2 minipodcasts/week for months 3–6; Podcast+Mobile was also instructed to use the FatSecret Calorie Counter app and Twitter, with the study coordinator sending 2 messages/day.
- Weight was measured at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months; measures included online questionnaires, 2 unannounced 24-hour dietary recalls, Paffenbarger Physical Activity Questionnaire, Weight Efficacy Life-Style Questionnaire, Eating Behavior Inventory, information-processing variables, weekly self-report, and objective podcast downloads. Analyses used intention-to-treat with baseline observation carried forward except for some 6-month-only variables assessed in completers; tests included t tests, repeated-measures ANOVA, logistic regression, chi-square, and Pearson correlation in SPSS 16.0.
Limitations
Stated: the study population was mostly white and female; the 6-month duration allowed examination of initial weight loss but not weight-loss maintenance; groups differed at baseline in prior health-related podcast/app experience; and noncompleters were younger and less likely to be white.
- Stated: the intervention did not include study counselor feedback or tailoring of messages/information, and the self-monitoring app and Twitter were poorly used; Twitter was not viewed as useful for weight-loss efforts (mean 3.4, SD 1.8, out of 7), and posting declined over time.
- Evident from the text: neither participants nor investigators were blinded to treatment assignment; dietary monitoring and Twitter use were largely self-reported; and months 3–6 overlapped with US holidays while the intervention dose was reduced, which the authors suggest may have affected outcomes.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 28 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
Podcast+Mobile participants relied on online sources (10/40, 25% vs 0/40; P=.001).
“whereas Podcast+Mobile participants relied on online sources (10/40, 25% vs 0/40; P = .001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The number of podcasts participants reported downloading over the 6-month period was significantly moderately correlated with weight loss in both the Podcast+Mobile (r=-.46, P=.001) and the Podcast (r=-.53, P<.001) groups.
“The number of podcasts participants reported downloading over the 6-month period was significantly moderately correlated with weight loss in both the Podcast+Mobile (r = –.46, P = .001) and the Podcast (r = –.53, P < .001) groups.”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“The number of podcasts participants reported downloading over the 6-month period was significantly moderately correlated with weight loss in both the Podcast+Mobile (r = –.46, P = .001) and the Podcast (r = –.53, P < .001) groups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Also stated in: § Results · plain
- Findingown data
Days per week of reported diet monitoring did not differ between Podcast+Mobile (mean 2.3, SD 1.9) and Podcast (mean 1.9, SD 1.7) groups (P=.28).
“Days/week of reported diet monitoring did not differ between Podcast+Mobile (mean 2.3, SD 1.9 days/week) and Podcast groups (mean 1.9, SD 1.7 days/week; P = .28) but method of monitoring did differ.”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“There was no difference between groups in the mean days per week that dietary intake or physical activity were self-reported by participants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported days per week of diet monitoring accurately reflects actual monitoring frequency.
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
- Findingown data
More Podcast participants relied on friends (11/40, 28% vs 4/40, 10%; P=.045).
“More Podcast participants relied on friends (11/40, 28% vs 4/40, 10%; P = .045)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There were significant differences in reported source of social support between groups.
“There were significant differences in reported source of social support between groups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingown data
Weight loss did not differ by group at 6 months (mean -2.7% Podcast+Mobile, n=47; mean -2.7% Podcast, n=49; P=.98).
“Weight loss did not differ by group at 6 months: mean –2.7% (SD 5.6%) Podcast+Mobile, n = 47; mean –2.7% (SD 5.1%) Podcast, n = 49; P = .98.”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“The percentage weight loss at 3 or 6 months did not differ between the groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Results · plain
- Findingown data
The method of diet monitoring differed by group.
“but method of monitoring did differ.”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“The method of self-monitoring, however, differed by group.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported method of diet monitoring accurately reflects the actual method used.
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
- Findingown data
Podcast+Mobile participants were 3.5 times more likely than the Podcast group to use an app to monitor diet (95% CI 1.29-8.84; P=.01).
“Podcast+Mobile participants were 3.5 times more likely than the Podcast group to use an app to monitor diet (P = .01)”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“Podcast+Mobile participants were 3.5 times more likely than the Podcast group to use an app to monitor diet over the course of the study (95% confidence interval, 1.29–8.84; P = .01)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported method of diet monitoring accurately reflects the actual method used.
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
- Findingown data
The majority of Podcast participants reported using the Web (14/41, 34%) or paper (12/41, 29%) to monitor diet.
“whereas the majority of Podcast participants reported using the Web (14/41, 34%) or paper (12/41, 29%).”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“whereas the majority of Podcast participants reported using Web (14/41, 34%) or paper (12/41, 29%) methods.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported method of diet monitoring accurately reflects the actual method used.
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
- Findingown data
There were more podcast downloads per episode in the Podcast+Mobile group (1.4/person) than in the Podcast group (1.1/person; P<.001).
“There were more downloads per episode in the Podcast+Mobile group (1.4/person) than in the Podcast group (1.1/person; P < .001).”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“the objective data from the podcast hosting site showed a significant difference in the number of downloads by group with more downloads occurring in the Podcast+Mobile group than in the Podcast group during both 0–3 months (P < .001) and 3–6 months (P < .001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Also stated in: § Results · plain
- Findingown data
There was a trend (P=.06) toward greater elaboration among Podcast+Mobile participants at 6 months.
“and there was a trend (P = .06) toward greater elaboration among Podcast+Mobile participants.”
- Also stated in: § Results · hedged
“there was a trend (P = .06) at 6 months with Podcast+Mobile participants reporting more elaboration than Podcast participants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Also stated in: § Results · hedged
- Findingown data
There were no differences in weight loss between groups.
“and no differences in weight loss”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There was no difference between groups at 0-3 months or 3-6 months in mean number of reported podcasts downloaded.
“There was no difference between groups at 0–3 months or 3–6 months in mean number of reported podcasts downloaded.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Most participants in this study did not achieve a 5% weight loss.
“Most participants in this study did not achieve a 5% weight loss”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There were no significant differences between groups in energy expenditure or intake at 3 or 6 months.
“There were no significant differences between groups in energy expenditure or intake at 3 or 6 months.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Within the Podcast+Mobile group, 28% (n = 13) posted weekly or more during months 3-6.
“and 28% (n = 13) posting weekly or more during months 3–6.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There was no difference between groups in the mean days per week that physical activity was self-reported.
“There was no difference between groups in the mean days per week that dietary intake or physical activity were self-reported by participants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported days per week of diet monitoring accurately reflects actual monitoring frequency.
- Findingown data
The addition of prompts and support provided via Twitter, as well as mobile monitoring provided via a diet and physical activity app, did not enhance weight losses over what was seen by just using a podcast alone and encouraging participants to monitor with an approach of their choice.
“The addition of prompts and support provided via Twitter, as well as mobile monitoring provided via a diet and physical activity app, did not enhance weight losses over what was seen by just using a podcast alone and encouraging participants to monitor with an approach of their choice.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The group-by-time interaction was not significant for any of the variables.
“The group-by-time interaction was not significant for any of the variables.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Within the Podcast+Mobile group, 94% (n = 44) posted at least once to Twitter.
“Within the Podcast+Mobile group, 94% (n = 44) posted at least once to Twitter”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Podcast+Mobile participants made significantly more posts to Twitter in the first 3 months (2.8, SD 3.6 posts/week) than in months 3-6 (1.3, SD 3.0 posts/week; P < .001).
“with significantly more posts being made in the first 3 months (2.8, SD 3.6 posts/week) than in months 3–6 (1.3, SD 3.0 posts/week; P < .001)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There was a trend (P = .06) toward a difference in elaboration between groups at 6 months.
“there was a trend (P = .06) at 6 months”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Within the Podcast+Mobile group, 64% (n = 30) posted at least weekly during the first 3 months.
“with 64% (n = 30) posting at least weekly during the first 3 months”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
At 6 months, there was no difference in how supported participants reported feeling (Podcast+Mobile mean 5.0, SD 1.5 vs 4.8, SD 1.7; P = .67).
“Although there was no difference in how supported (rated 0–7) participants reported feeling at 6 months (Podcast+Mobile mean 5.0, SD 1.5 vs 4.8, SD 1.7; P = .67)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Podcast+Mobile participants reported that the intervention was more novel at both 3 and 6 months.
“Podcast+Mobile participants reported that the intervention was more novel at both 3 and 6 months.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Collapsing the data across groups, mean days per week of dietary self-monitoring over the 6-month study differed by method used to record intake: mobile app 2.9 (SD 1.9) days/week, website 2.3 (SD 1.9) days/week, and paper journal 1.6 (SD 1.3) days/week (F 2,7 = 3.41, P=.04).
“Collapsing the data across groups, mean days per week of dietary self-monitoring over the 6-month study differed by method used to record intake: mean 2.9 (SD 1.9) days/week mobile app, n = 37; 2.3 (SD) 1.9 days/week website, n = 24; and 1.6 (SD 1.3) days/week paper journal, n = 17; n = 3 reported using nothing for monitoring and n = 15 did not report a method; F 2,7 = 3.41, P = .04).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported days per week of diet monitoring accurately reflects actual monitoring frequency.
- Findingown data
There was no significant difference in elaboration at 3 months between groups.
“There was no significant difference in elaboration at 3 months between groups”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Elaboration did not differ between the groups at 3 months.
“Although elaboration did not differ between the groups at 3 months”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
More Podcast participants reported mainly relying on friends for social support than Podcast+Mobile participants (11/40, 28% vs 4/40, 10%; P = .045).
“More of the Podcast participants reported mainly relying on friends for social support (11/40, 28% Podcast vs 4/40, 10% Podcast+Mobile; P = .045)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The Podcast+Mobile group lost a mean of -2.4 (SD 3.4) kg at 3 months, compared with -2.3 (SD 3.3) kg in the Podcast group.
“The Podcast+Mobile group lost a mean of –2.4 (SD 3.4) kg at 3 months (vs –2.3, SD 3.3 kg in the Podcast group)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Podcast+Mobile participants made a mean of 2.1 (SD 3.1) posts to Twitter per week.
“Podcast+Mobile participants made a mean of 2.1 (SD 3.1) posts to Twitter per week”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There were no differences in days of self-reported diet monitoring by group.
“Since there were no differences in days of self-reported diet monitoring by group”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Podcast+Mobile participants reported greater user control at 3 months than Podcast participants.
“Podcast+Mobile participants reported greater user control at 3 months.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
More Podcast+Mobile participants reported their main form of support came from online sources, such as Twitter, Facebook, or blogs, than Podcast participants (10/40, 25% vs 0%; P = .001).
“more Podcast+Mobile participants reported their main form of support came from online sources, such as Twitter, Facebook, or blogs (10/40, 25% Podcast+Mobile vs 0% Podcast; P = .001)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There was a significant difference in the main form of social support participants reported during the 6-month trial.
“there was a significant difference in the main form of social support participants reported during the 6-month trial.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
On average, Podcast+Mobile group participants did not view Twitter as being useful to their weight-loss efforts (mean score 3.4, SD 1.8, out of 7).
“On average, Podcast+Mobile group participants did not view Twitter as being useful to their weight-loss efforts (mean score of 3.4, SD 1.8, out of 7).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Tukey HSD post hoc analysis showed a significant difference in mean days per week of diet self-monitoring between paper journal methods and using a mobile app to record diet (P=.03).
“Tukey honestly significant difference (HSD) post hoc analysis shows a significant difference in mean days per week of diet self-monitoring between paper journal methods and using a mobile app to record diet (P = .03).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Self-reported days per week of diet monitoring accurately reflects actual monitoring frequency.
- Findingown data
There was no significant difference in cognitive load between groups.
“There was no significant difference in cognitive load”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The number of podcasts participants reported downloading from months 0 to 3 and months 3 to 6 did not differ between the groups.
“The number of podcasts participants reported downloading from months 0 to 3 and months 3 to 6 did not differ between the groups”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There were no differences in cognitive load between the Podcast+Mobile and Podcast groups.
“but no differences in cognitive load”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There were no differences in self-monitoring days per week at either 3 or 6 months between the groups.
“We saw no differences in self-monitoring days per week at either 3 or 6 months between the groups”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At 6 months, only 29% (12/41) of Podcast participants were using a paper recording method to self-monitor dietary intake.
“at 6 months, only 29% (12/41) of participants were using a paper recording method to self-monitor dietary intake.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Only 60% (24/40) of participants in the Podcast+Mobile group reported using a mobile app for diet monitoring.
“Only 60% (24/40) of participants in the Podcast+Mobile group, however, reported using a mobile app for diet monitoring.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
With both groups collapsed, there was a significant difference in number of days per week participants reported self-monitoring diet, with participants using a mobile device recording twice as many days as those using a paper method.
“With both groups collapsed, we did see a significant difference in number of days per week participants reported self-monitoring diet, with participants using a mobile device recording twice as many days as those using a paper method.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The present study demonstrated high elaboration and user control within the Podcast+Mobile group as compared with the Podcast group.
“The present study also demonstrated high elaboration and user control within the Podcast+Mobile group as compared with the Podcast group”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The objective number of downloads from each group's podcast site differed significantly.
“the objective number of downloads from each groups’ podcast site did differ significantly.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Despite changes in information processing variables, weight losses did not differ between the groups.
“Despite changes in these information processing variables, weight losses did not differ between the groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The groups differed in prior experience with apps and podcasts.
“The groups also differed in prior experience with apps and podcasts”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
The addition of Twitter and mobile diet monitoring led to greater feelings of novelty among Podcast+Mobile participants than among participants who received only a podcast.
“The addition of Twitter and mobile diet monitoring led to greater feelings of novelty among Podcast+Mobile participants than for the participants who received only a podcast.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
The self-monitoring app and Twitter were poorly used by participants.
“The self-monitoring app and Twitter, however, were poorly used by participants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Both groups reported monitoring an average of approximately 2.5 days/week from 0 to 3 months and 1.5 days/week from months 3 to 6.
“with both groups reporting monitoring an average of approximately 2.5 days/week from 0 to 3 months and 1.5 days/week from months 3 to 6.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Podcast+Mobile participants reported relying more on online sources of support than on friends and family.
“the Podcast+Mobile participants reported relying more on online sources of support than on friends and family.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Participants in both groups reported low levels of cognitive load (11 out of 14; higher score corresponding to less cognitive load).
“Participants in both groups reported low levels of cognitive load (11 out of 14; with a higher score corresponding to less cognitive load)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There were significantly more downloads per person in the Podcast+Mobile group than in the Podcast group.
“There were significantly more downloads per person in the Podcast+Mobile group than in the Podcast group.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The Mobile POD, 6-month, minimal-contact intervention was effective at helping participants achieve a mean weight loss of 2.7% of their body weight.
“the Mobile POD, 6-month, minimal-contact intervention was effective at helping participants achieve a mean weight loss of 2.7% of their body weight”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Prompting and mobile communication via Twitter and monitoring app without feedback did not enhance weight loss.
“but prompting and mobile communication via Twitter and monitoring app without feedback did not enhance weight loss.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The provision of a calorie/fat gram book to the Podcast group did not offset the absence of the mobile app and Twitter components, so the comparison between groups isolates the effect of the mobile components.
- Premisecitation
Behavioral weight-loss research programs typically involve weekly or twice-monthly, face-to-face behavioral sessions involving a group of 10-20 members and a team of weight-loss research staff.
“Behavioral weight-loss research programs typically involve weekly or twice-monthly, face-to-face behavioral sessions involving a group of 10–20 members and a team of weight-loss research staff [7].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] Smith, CF, 2000, Diabetes Spectr
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
A minimally intensive weight-loss intervention can be delivered via podcast.
“Results confirm and extend previous findings showing a minimally intensive weight-loss intervention can be delivered via podcast”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The observed weight loss in the Podcast and Podcast+Mobile groups is attributable to the podcast intervention rather than to other factors such as regression to the mean, seasonal effects, or measurement.
- Premisecitation
Our previous work demonstrated that a short-term behavioral weight-loss intervention could be successfully delivered via podcast.
“Our previous work demonstrated that a short-term behavioral weight-loss intervention could be successfully delivered via podcast [19].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The minimal weight loss that occurred during months 3-6 (approximately -0.25 kg or -0.55 lb) demonstrates that this intervention may have worked to prevent holiday weight gain, versus promoting additional weight loss during this vulnerable period.
“the fact that only minimal weight loss occurred during months 3–6 in the present study (approximately –0.25 kg or –0.55 lb) demonstrates that this intervention may have worked to prevent holiday weight gain, versus promoting additional weight loss during this vulnerable period.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Without the intervention, participants would have gained weight during the holiday period.
- Premisenone given
No previous studies have employed a combination of podcasting, mobile support communication, and mobile diet monitoring to assist people in weight loss.
“To our knowledge, no previous studies have employed a combination of podcasting, mobile support communication, and mobile diet monitoring to assist people in weight loss.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
In Patrick et al.'s SMS intervention, participants on average lost 3.16% of their body weight at 4 months.
“This behavioral weight-loss intervention was delivered entirely through SMS with a mixture of standard and targeted messages to participants, who on average had lost 3.16% of their body weight at 4 months [17].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
A podcast-only format limited the ability to provide participants with easy ways to self-monitor diet and physical activity and to receive social support.
“A podcast-only format also limited the ability to provide participants with easy ways to self-monitor diet and physical activity and to receive social support (that would normally be delivered in a face-to-face group setting).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The addition of social networking support and mobile diet and physical activity monitoring did not enhance EBI score, WEL score, energy expenditure, or energy intake beyond receiving the theory-based podcast alone.
“demonstrating that the addition of social networking support and mobile diet and physical activity monitoring did not enhance these outcomes beyond receiving the theory-based podcast alone.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
Few studies have used an entirely mobile device-based approach to deliver a behavioral weight-loss intervention.
“Few studies, however, have used an entirely mobile device-based approach to deliver a behavioral weight-loss intervention.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Those who have lost weight are more vulnerable than normal-weight individuals to holiday weight gain and weight retention after the holiday.
“those who have lost weight are more vulnerable than normal-weight individuals to holiday weight gain and weight retention after the holiday [33].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [33] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Weight losses were significantly greater in the enhanced podcast group (mean -2.9, SD 3.5 kg) than in the controls (mean -0.3, SD 2.1 kg; P < .001 between groups).
“Weight losses were significantly greater in the enhanced podcast group (mean –2.9, SD 3.5 kg) than in the controls (mean –0.3, SD 2.1 kg; P < .001 between groups).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
A very-low-intensity intervention delivered entirely by mobile technology can produce short-term, modest weight loss.
“The results show that a very-low-intensity intervention that is delivered entirely by mobile technology can produce short-term, modest weight loss.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Observational studies have shown that the average weight gain over the holiday period in the United States ranges from 0.4 to 0.8 kg.
“Observational studies have shown that the average weight gain over the holiday period in the United States ranges from 0.4 to 0.8 kg [31,32].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
In that 3-month trial, 78 participants were randomly assigned to receive a podcast designed based on social cognitive theory (enhanced) or a popular weight-loss podcast (control) available online.
“In that 3-month trial, 78 participants were randomly assigned to receive a podcast designed based on social cognitive theory [20] (enhanced) or a popular weight-loss podcast (control) available online.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Study design and conductown data
There were no significant differences in baseline demographics between the two groups.
“There were no significant differences in baseline demographics between the two groups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Holiday weight gain may be greater among those who are overweight or obese than among normal-weight people.
“Holiday weight gain may be greater among those who are overweight or obese than among normal-weight people [31,32].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
The time of year when the study was administered may have affected the outcomes.
“the time of year when the study was administered may have affected the outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Providing these components (social support and dietary monitoring) was not necessary.
“demonstrating that providing these components was not necessary”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The addition of Twitter to the intervention did not increase the burden on working memory.
“and therefore the addition of Twitter to the intervention did not increase the burden on working memory [36].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [36] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Other effective aspects were not included, such as study counselor feedback and tailoring of messages and information.
“Other effective aspects were not included, such as study counselor feedback and tailoring of messages and information [44].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [44] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
These additional components were not well integrated by participants.
“This demonstrates that these additional components were not well integrated by participants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Adherence to monitoring is what is important for weight loss, regardless of method.
“This demonstrates that adherence to monitoring is what is important for weight loss [40], regardless of method.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [40] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The podcasts' emphasis on directing participants to find these components was effective.
“and that the podcasts’ emphasis on directing participants to find these components was effective.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The intervention perhaps was useful in preventing holiday weight gain.
“and perhaps was useful in preventing holiday weight gain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Without the intervention, participants would have gained weight during the holiday period.
- May combine two claims. 31
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 24
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataPodcast+Mobile participants felt more user control at 3 months (P=.02), but not at 6 months.
“Podcast+Mobile participants felt more user control at 3 months (P = .02), but not at 6 months”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“Podcast+Mobile participants reported more user control at 3 months but not at 6 months (P = .08).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Results · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataGroups did not differ in changes in fat intake, self-efficacy (WEL score), or weight-related eating behaviors (EBI score) at 3 or 6 months.
“Groups did not differ in changes in fat intake, self-efficacy (WEL score), or weight-related eating behaviors (EBI score) at 3 or 6 months.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe Podcast+Mobile group lost an additional -0.2 (SD 3.0) kg from months 3 to 6, compared with -0.3 (SD 1.8) kg in the Podcast group; the time-by-group interaction was not significant (P=.88).
“and an additional –0.2 (SD 3.0) kg from months 3 to 6 (vs –0.3, SD 1.8 kg in the Podcast group; P = .88 for time-by-group interaction).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere was no difference in number of days of diet monitoring or weight loss by type of mobile device.
“There was no difference in number of days of diet monitoring or weight loss by type of mobile device.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe intervention groups did not differ in changes in EBI score, WEL score, energy expenditure, or energy intake.
“The intervention groups did not differ in changes in EBI score, WEL score, energy expenditure, or energy intake”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningBoth groups felt equally supported in their weight-loss efforts, but source of support differed.
“Both groups felt equally supported in their weight-loss efforts, but source of support differed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataParticipants who did not complete the study were significantly younger and less likely than completers to be white.
“Participants who did not complete the study were significantly younger and less likely than completers to be white”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningPodcast participants mainly turned to real-life friends as sources of support, whereas Podcast+Mobile participants relied on Internet-based sources, namely Twitter.
“Podcast participants mainly turned to real-life friends as sources of support, whereas Podcast+Mobile participants relied on Internet-based sources, namely Twitter.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBoth groups reported similar levels of social support and days of dietary monitoring.
“Both groups reported similar levels of social support and days of dietary monitoring”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAlthough days per week of diet monitoring did not differ between groups, method of monitoring did.
“Although days per week of diet monitoring did not differ between groups, method of monitoring did.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe study population was mostly white and female.
“The study population was mostly white and female.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe number of Twitter posts averaged 2 per week and declined over time, so participants were not communicating with other group members frequently.
“However, the number of Twitter posts averaged 2 per week, and declined over time, so participants were not communicating with other group members frequently.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenEqual numbers of participants from each group were members of Twitter at baseline.
“and equal numbers of participants from each group were members of Twitter at baseline.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationBehavioral interventions that target improvements in diet and physical activity are an effective way to help people lose weight and decrease chronic disease risk factors.
“Behavioral interventions that target improvements in diet and physical activity are an effective way to help people lose weight and decrease chronic disease risk factors [6].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [6] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFace-to-face behavioral weight-loss interventions are time and resource intensive and not easy to disseminate.
“Although this can be an effective way to help people lose weight, it is time and resource intensive and not easy to disseminate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] Smith, CF, 2000, Diabetes Spectr
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
PremisecitationMany people feel that participation in face-to-face weight-loss interventions is time consuming and often inconvenient.
“Additionally, many people feel that participation in face-to-face weight-loss interventions is time consuming and often inconvenient [8].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] Sherwood, NE, 1998, Am J Health Promot source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
PremisereasoningMoving away from a face-to-face setting to a mobile delivery method is a promising strategy in the delivery of a behavioral weight-loss intervention.
“Moving away from a face-to-face setting to a mobile delivery method is a promising strategy in the delivery of a behavioral weight-loss intervention.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataMore people in the Podcast+Mobile group than in the Podcast group reported previously downloading a health-related podcast (P=.04).
“More people in the Podcast+Mobile group than in the Podcast group reported previously downloading a health-related podcast (P = .04) or installing a healthy diet-related app to their mobile device (P = .04).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataParticipants were randomly assigned using a computerized random numbers generator.
“Participants were randomly assigned using a computerized random numbers generator (as conducted by study investigators) once they completed of all their baseline questionnaires.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataAll data collection and analyses used intention-to-treat with baseline observation carried forward imputation, except some variables collected only at 6 months, which were assessed using completers only.
“We conducted all data collection and analyses using intention-to-treat by using imputation (baseline observation carried forward), with the exception of some variables that we collected only at 6 months (such as information processing variables), which we assessed using completers only.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationPatrick and colleagues conducted a study that used an entirely mobile-based approach among overweight men and women.
“One study that used an entirely mobile-based approach was conducted by Patrick and colleagues [17] among overweight men and women.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningNeither study participants nor investigators were blind to treatment assignment.
“Neither study participants nor investigators were blind to treatment assignment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataIn a model examining demographic factors as predictors of noncompletion at 6 months, there was a significant effect of age (P=.005) and a trend with ethnicity (P=.06), but not of gender, group assignment, or baseline BMI.
“In a model examining demographic factors as predictors of noncompletion of the study at 6 months, there was a significant effect of age (P = .005) and a trend with ethnicity (P = .06), but not of gender, group assignment, or baseline BMI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataMore people in the Podcast+Mobile group than in the Podcast group reported previously installing a healthy diet-related app to their mobile device (P=.04).
“More people in the Podcast+Mobile group than in the Podcast group reported previously downloading a health-related podcast (P = .04) or installing a healthy diet-related app to their mobile device (P = .04).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationMobile devices have been used successfully to provide dietary guidance and to self-monitor weight and other health-related variables and dietary intake.
“Mobile devices have been used successfully to provide dietary guidance [12] and self-monitor weight and other health-related variables [13,14] and dietary intake [15].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenQuestionnaire items were transformed from paper instruments to online methods but had not been previously validated for online use.
“These questionnaire items were transformed from paper instruments to online methods (but had not been previously validated for online use).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenBoth conditions were active treatments and participants were not told which group was the intervention of interest or enhanced group.
“Both conditions were active treatments and participants were not told which group was the intervention of interest or enhanced group.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataParticipants who did not complete the study at 6 months (n=10) were younger (mean 31.0 vs 44.3 years) and were 4.7 times less likely to be white (95% CI 0.96-23.24).
“Participants who did not complete the study at 6 months (n = 10) were younger (mean 31.0, SD 11.2 vs 44.3, SD 10.3 years) and were 4.7 times (95% confidence interval, 0.96–23.24) less likely to be white (4/10, 40% black, 2/10, 20% Asian, and 4/10, 40% white).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataGreater elaboration and user control may have led to greater podcast usage, as evidenced by more podcast downloads to the Podcast+Mobile group site.
“Greater elaboration and user control, however, may have led to greater podcast usage, as evidenced by more podcast downloads to the Podcast+Mobile group site.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationOur prior podcasting study showed greater elaboration and user control among the enhanced theory-based podcast at 3 months than among the control podcast.
“Our prior podcasting study showed greater elaboration and user control among the enhanced theory-based podcast at 3 months than among the control podcast [19].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe study had strong retention rates.
“The study also had strong retention rates”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThose in the Podcast+Mobile group may have been more technically savvy or more familiar with the technology used in the study at baseline.
“showing that those in the Podcast+Mobile group may have been more technically savvy or more familiar with the technology used in the study at baseline.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationown dataSome aspect of the study may not have been well suited to this demographic group.
“and therefore some aspect of the study may not have been well suited to this demographic group.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationGreater usage of weight-loss study components has been shown to lead to improved weight losses.
“Greater usage of weight-loss study components has been shown to lead to improved weight losses [37].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [37] source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSeveral studies have shown that targeting dietary self-monitoring, providing social support, and emphasizing both dietary changes and physical activity are key components to successful face-to-face behavioral weight-loss programs.
“Several studies have shown that targeting dietary self-monitoring, providing social support, and emphasizing both dietary changes and physical activity are key components to successful face-to-face behavioral weight-loss programs [43].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [43] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSeveral of the components of Internet-based weight-loss interventions that have been shown to be effective were part of the Podcast+Mobile intervention, including self-monitoring, use of established behavioral strategies, and social support.
“Several of the components of Internet-based weight-loss interventions that have been shown to be effective were part of the Podcast+Mobile intervention, including self-monitoring, use of established behavioral strategies, and social support [44].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [44] source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationSocial support has been shown to be a possible key component in behavioral weight-loss programs.
“Social support has been shown to be a possible key component in behavioral weight-loss programs [41].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [41] source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationSelf-monitoring of dietary intake is an important component of behavioral weight-loss programs.
“Self-monitoring of dietary intake is an important component of behavioral weight-loss programs [38].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [38] Burke, LE, 2005, J Ren Nutr source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThis intervention is an approach that could be easily disseminated, as there was very minimal contact with participants, everything was delivered remotely, and it was low cost.
“This intervention is an approach that could be easily disseminated, as there was very minimal contact with participants, everything was delivered remotely, and it was low cost.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The intervention was low cost.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe additional components of Twitter and mobile diet monitoring did not increase cognitive burden and allowed for continued elaboration and user control.
“demonstrating that the additional components of Twitter and mobile diet monitoring did not increase cognitive burden and allowed for continued elaboration and user control.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThis difference in prior experience did not seem to affect the results.
“This did not seem to affect the results”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThis intervention used a randomized design and intention-to-treat analysis.
“This intervention used a randomized design and intention-to-treat analysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataBoth groups found ways to self-monitor diet and obtain social support, meaning that structural aspects of the groups differed in type but not amount, which was reflected in the weight-loss outcomes.
“Both groups, however, found ways to self-monitor diet and obtain social support, meaning that structural aspects of the groups differed in type but not amount, which was reflected in the weight-loss outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe study used an objective measure for weight.
“used an objective measure for weight”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe study included 2 unannounced days of dietary intake collected using a multiple-pass method.
“included 2 unannounced days of dietary intake collected using a multiple-pass method.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe study was short-term (6 months) and so it was able to examine initial weight loss but not weight-loss maintenance.
“The study was short-term (6 months) and so it was able to examine initial weight loss but not weight-loss maintenance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The observed weight loss in the Podcast and Podcast+Mobile groups is attributable to the podcast intervention rather than to other factors such as regression to the mean, seasonal effects, or measurement.
“Results confirm and extend previous findings showing a minimally intensive weight-loss intervention can be delivered via podcast”
The paper relies on this without support.
The provision of a calorie/fat gram book to the Podcast group did not offset the absence of the mobile app and Twitter components, so the comparison between groups isolates the effect of the mobile components.
“The Podcast group—but not the Podcast+Mobile group—received a book with calorie and fat gram amounts of food to assist them in monitoring their dietary intake.”
“but prompting and mobile communication via Twitter and monitoring app without feedback did not enhance weight loss.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Self-reported method of diet monitoring accurately reflects the actual method used.
“Podcast+Mobile participants were 3.5 times more likely than the Podcast group to use an app to monitor diet (P = .01)”
The paper relies on this without support.
Self-reported days per week of diet monitoring accurately reflects actual monitoring frequency.
“Days/week of reported diet monitoring did not differ between Podcast+Mobile (mean 2.3, SD 1.9 days/week) and Podcast groups (mean 1.9, SD 1.7 days/week; P = .28) but method of monitoring did differ.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Without the intervention, participants would have gained weight during the holiday period.
“the fact that only minimal weight loss occurred during months 3–6 in the present study (approximately –0.25 kg or –0.55 lb) demonstrates that this intervention may have worked to prevent holiday weight gain, versus promoting additional weight loss during this vulnerable period.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The intervention was low cost.
“This intervention is an approach that could be easily disseminated, as there was very minimal contact with participants, everything was delivered remotely, and it was low cost.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Other mobile health apps have performed poorly.
“While some apps have demonstrated efficacy in definitive trials [2-5], others have performed poorly [6-9].”
From A Library of Analytic Indicators to Evaluate Effective Engagement with Consumer mHealth Apps for Chronic Conditions: Scoping Review (2019) · cites this paper as [8]
There have not been any RCTs of a smartphone app as a weight loss intervention in itself using both self-monitoring and text-messaging functions.
“Although there have been RCTs using text-messaging interventions for weight management, PDAs for self-monitoring and smartphone apps as adjuncts to other weight management interventions, to our knowledge there have not been any RCTs of a smartphone app as a weight loss intervention in itself using both self-monitoring and text-messaging functions.”
From Adherence to a Smartphone Application for Weight Loss Compared to Website and Paper Diary: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial (2013) · cites this paper as [20]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Social-support rating scale has two different starting points
MinorThe methods describe a 1-to-7-point scale for perceived support, but the results describe it as rated from 0 to 7.
“Participants were also asked (on a 1- to 7-point Likert scale) to rate how supported they felt in their weight-loss efforts at 6 months.”
“Although there was no difference in how supported (rated 0–7) participants reported feeling at 6 months”
Initial Twitter cohort sizes differ between sections
MinorThe methods say the four initial cohorts had 11-12 people each, while the discussion says they had 10-11. Four cohorts of at most 11 also cannot accommodate all 47 Podcast+Mobile participants.
“During months 0–3, Podcast+Mobile participants were divided into 4 groups to create Twitter cohorts of 11–12 people.”
“Podcast+Mobile participants were initially assigned to a small cohort of 10–11 people.”
Cites
Prevalence and Trends in Obesity Among US Adults, 1999-2008
Flegal, K. M. (2010) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2009.2014 · Cited by 7,580 · see citing works
Health Promotion by Social Cognitive Means
Bandura, A. (2004) · Health Education & Behavior · doi:10.1177/1090198104263660 · Cited by 7,238 · see citing works
Prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and obesity-related health risk factors, 2001
Mokdad, A. H., Ford, E. S., Bowman, B. A., Dietz, W. H., Vinicor, F., Bales, V. S., & Marks, J. S. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.289.1.76 · Cited by 5,866 · see citing works
The Disease Burden Associated With Overweight and Obesity
Must, A. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.282.16.1523 · Cited by 4,804 · see citing works
Cognitive Load Measurement as a Means to Advance Cognitive Load Theory
Paas, F., Tuovinen, J. E., Tabbers, H., & Van Gerven, P. W. M. (2003) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3801_8 · Cited by 2,527 · see citing works
The IMAGE Study Group, Greaves, C. J., Sheppard, K. E., Abraham, C., Hardeman, W., Roden, M., Evans, P. H., & Schwarz, P. (2011) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-119 · Cited by 1,163 · see citing works
Direct Measurement of Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning
Brunken, R., Plass, J. L., & Leutner, D. (2003) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3801_7 · Cited by 896 · see citing works
Controlling the Information Flow: Effects on Consumers' Decision Making and Preferences
Ariely, D. (2000) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/314322 · Cited by 724 · see citing works
Self-efficacy in weight management.
Clark, M. M., Abrams, D. B., NIAURA, R. S., Eaton, C. A., & al, E. (1991) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.59.5.739 · Cited by 693 · see citing works
A Text Message–Based Intervention for Weight Loss: Randomized Controlled Trial
Patrick, K., Raab, F., Adams, M. A., Dillon, L., Zabinski, M., Rock, C. L., Griswold, W. G., & Norman, G. J. (2009) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1100 · Cited by 671 · see citing works
PHYSICAL ACTIVITY AND INCIDENCE OF HYPERTENSION IN COLLEGE ALUMNI
Paffenbarger, R. S., Wing, A. L., Hyde, R. T., & Jung, D. L. (1983) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113537 · Cited by 577 · see citing works
Hurling, R., Catt, M., De Boni, M., Fairley, B. W., Hurst, T., Murray, P., Richardson, A., & Sodhi, J. S. (2007) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.9.2.e7 · Cited by 536 · see citing works
Effect of Degree of Weight Loss on Health Benefits
Blackburn, G. L. (1995) · Obesity Research · doi:10.1002/j.1550-8528.1995.tb00466.x · Cited by 500 · see citing works
Cialdini, R. B., Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.002041 · Cited by 470 · see citing works
Tate, D. F., Jackvony, E. H., & Wing, R. R. (2006) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.166.15.1620 · Cited by 427 · see citing works
Self-citationA prospective study of holiday weight gain
Yanovski, J. A., Yanovski, S. Z., Sovik, K. N., Nguyen, T. T., O'Neil, P. M., & Sebring, N. G. (2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200003233421206 · Cited by 334 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Holiday weight gain may be greater among those who are overweight or obese than among normal-weight people [31,32].”
BackgroundAssessment of Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning Using Dual-Task Methodology
Brünken, R., Steinbacher, S., Plass, J. L., & Leutner, D. (2002) · Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) · doi:10.1027//1618-3169.49.2.109 · Cited by 333 · see citing works
Weight loss during the intensive intervention phase of the weight-loss maintenance trial
Hollis, J. F., Gullion, C. M., Stevens, V. J., Brantley, P. J., Appel, L. J., Ard, J. D., Champagne, C. M., Dalcin, A., Erlinger, T. P., Funk, K., et al. (2008) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2008.04.013 · Cited by 321 · see citing works
Role of social support in lifestyle-focused weight management interventions
Verheijden, M. W., Bakx, J. C., van Weel, C., Koelen, M. A., & van Staveren, W. A. (2005) · European Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602194 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
User Control and Structural Isomorphism or Disorientation and Cognitive Load?
Eveland, W. P., & Dunwoody, S. (2001) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365001028001002 · Cited by 254 · see citing works
Anhøj, J., & Møldrup, C. (2004) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.6.4.e42 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Subar, A. F., Crafts, J., Zimmerman, T. P., Wilson, M., Mittl, B., Islam, N. G., McNutt, S., Potischman, N., Buday, R., Hull, S. G., et al. (2010) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/j.jada.2009.10.007 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
A Review of Efficacious Technology-Based Weight-Loss Interventions: Five Key Components
Khaylis, A., Yiaslas, T., Bergstrom, J., & Gore-Felton, C. (2010) · Telemedicine and e-Health · doi:10.1089/tmj.2010.0065 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Evaluation of the Revised Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire in older adults
Cardinal, B. J., ESTERS, J., & Cardinal, M. K. (1996) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1097/00005768-199604000-00011 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Benefits of sustained moderate weight loss in obesity.
Pasanisi, F., Contaldo, F., SIMONE, G. D., & Mancini, M. (2001) · PubMed · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Self-Monitoring Dietary Intake: Current and Future Practices
Burke, L. E., Warziski, M., Starrett, T., Choo, J., Music, E., Sereika, S., Stark, S., & Sevick, M. A. (2005) · Journal of Renal Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.jrn.2005.04.002 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Dombrowski, S. U., Avenell, A., & Sniehott, F. F. (2010) · Obesity Facts · doi:10.1159/000323076 · Cited by 156 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Behavioral interventions that target improvements in diet and physical activity are an effective way to help people lose weight and decrease chronic disease risk factors [6].”
BackgroundThe differential effects of rape prevention programming on attitudes, behavior, and knowledge.
Heppner, M. J., Humphrey, C. F., Hillenbrand‐Gunn, T. L., & DeBord, K. A. (1995) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.42.4.508 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Trial of Family and Friend Support for Weight Loss in African American Adults
Kumanyika, S., Wadden, T. A., Justine Shults, A., Fassbender, J. E., Brown, S. D., Bowman, M. A., Brake, V., West, W., Frazier, J., Whitt‐Glover, M. C., et al. (2009) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2009.337 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Lombard, C., Deeks, A., Jolley, D., Ball, K., & Teede, H. (2010) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.c3215 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Turner-McGrievy, G. M., Campbell, M. K., Tate, D. F., Truesdale, K. P., Bowling, J. M., & Crosby, L. (2009) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2009.06.010 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Self-citationAcharya, S. D., Elci, O. U., Sereika, S. M., Styn, M. A., & Burke, L. E. (2011) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/j.jada.2011.01.009 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Evaluation of a mobile phone-based diet game for weight control
Lee, W., Chae, Y. M., Kim, S., Ho, S. H., & Choi, I. (2010) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1258/jtt.2010.090913 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
The effect of the Thanksgiving Holiday on weight gain
Hull, H. R., Radley, D., Dinger, M. K., & Fields, D. A. (2006) · Nutrition Journal · doi:10.1186/1475-2891-5-29 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Consumer Preferences in Format and Type of Community-Based Weight Control Programs
Sherwood, N. E., Morton, N., Jeffery, R. W., French, S. A., Neumark-Sztainer, D., & Falkner, N. H. (1998) · American Journal of Health Promotion · doi:10.4278/0890-1171-13.1.12 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
A randomized comparison of two motivationally enhanced Internet behavioral weight loss programs
Webber, K. H., Tate, D. F., & Michael Bowling, J. (2008) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2008.06.008 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Self-citationHoliday weight management by successful weight losers and normal weight individuals.
Phelan, S., Wing, R. R., Raynor, H. A., Dibello, J., Nedeau, K., & Peng, W. (2008) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.76.3.442 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
O'Neil, P. M., & Rieder, S. L. (2005) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1467-789x.2005.00192.x · Cited by 46 · see citing works
A pilot study of mobile phone-based therapy for obese patients
Morak, J., Schindler, K., Goerzer, E., Kastner, P., Toplak, H., Ludvik, B., & Schreier, G. (2008) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1258/jtt.2008.003015 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Rossi, M. C., Perozzi, C., Consorti, C., Almonti, T., Foglini, P., Giostra, N., Nanni, P., Talevi, S., Bartolomei, D., & Vespasiani, G. (2010) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2010.0025 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Pasanisi, F, 2001, Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis, 11, 401
- Smith, CF, 2000, Diabetes Spectr, 13, 142
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Moorhead, S. A., Hazlett, D. E., Harrison, L., Carroll, J. K., Irwin, A., & Hoving, C. (2013) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1933 · Cited by 2,517 · see citing works
Free, C., Phillips, G., Galli, L., Watson, L., Felix, L., Edwards, P., Patel, V., & Haines, A. (2013) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001362 · Cited by 1,766 · see citing works
Maher, C. A., Lewis, L. K., Ferrar, K., Marshall, S., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., & Vandelanotte, C. (2014) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.2952 · Cited by 733 · see citing works
Carter, M. C., Burley, V. J., Nykjaer, C., & Cade, J. E. (2013) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.2283 · Cited by 666 · see citing works
Twitter as a Tool for Health Research: A Systematic Review
Sinnenberg, L. E., Buttenheim, A. M., Padrez, K., Mancheno, C., Ungar, L., & Merchant, R. M. (2016) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2016.303512 · Cited by 666 · see citing works
Laranjo, L., Arguel, A., Neves, A. L., Gallagher, A. M., Kaplan, R., Mortimer, N., Mendes, G. A., & Lau, A. Y. S. (2015) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002841 · Cited by 661 · see citing works
Does monitoring goal progress promote goal attainment? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence.
Harkin, B., Webb, T. L., Chang, B. P. I., Prestwich, A., Conner, M., Kellar, I., Benn, Y., & Sheeran, P. (2016) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000025 · Cited by 564 · see citing works
Flores Mateo, G., Granado-Font, E., Ferré-Grau, C., & Montaña-Carreras, X. (2015) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.4836 · Cited by 540 · see citing works
Payne, H., Lister, C., West, J. H., & Bernhardt, J. M. (2015) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/mhealth.3335 · Cited by 525 · see citing works
Burke, L. E., Ma, J., Azar, K. M. J., Bennett, G. G., Peterson, E. D., Zheng, Y., Riley, W., Stephens, J., Shah, S. H., Suffoletto, B., et al. (2015) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000232 · Cited by 516 · see citing works
Rathbone, A. L., & Prescott, J. (2017) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.7740 · Cited by 497 · see citing works
Hutchesson, M. J., Rollo, M. E., Krukowski, R., Ells, L., Harvey, J., Morgan, P. J., Callister, R., Plotnikoff, R., & Collins, C. E. (2015) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/obr.12268 · Cited by 380 · see citing works
Turner-McGrievy, G. M., Beets, M. W., Moore, J. B., Kaczynski, A. T., Barr-Anderson, D. J., & Tate, D. F. (2013) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001510 · Cited by 373 · see citing works
Self-citationDireito, A., Carraça, E., Rawstorn, J., Whittaker, R., & Maddison, R. (2017) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-016-9846-0 · Cited by 337 · see citing works
Mobile Applications for Weight Management
Azar, K. M. J., Lesser, L. I., Laing, B. Y., Stephens, J., Aurora, M. S., Burke, L. E., & Palaniappan, L. P. (2013) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2013.07.005 · Cited by 334 · see citing works
Charles, L., Reynolds, T. L., Cameron, M. A., Conway, M., Lau, E. H. Y., Olsen, J. M., Pavlin, J. A., Shigematsu, M., Streichert, L. C., Suda, K. J., et al. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0139701 · Cited by 322 · see citing works
Wang, Y., Xue, H., Huang, Y., Huang, L., & Zhang, D. (2017) · Advances in Nutrition · doi:10.3945/an.116.014100 · Cited by 310 · see citing works
Prescribable mHealth apps identified from an overview of systematic reviews
Byambasuren, O., Sanders, S., Beller, E., & Glasziou, P. (2018) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-018-0021-9 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
Villinger, K., Wahl, D. R., Boeing, H., Schupp, H. T., & Renner, B. (2019) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/obr.12903 · Cited by 290 · see citing works
Social Media Use in Chronic Disease: A Systematic Review and Novel Taxonomy
Patel, R. K., Chang, T., Greysen, S. R., & Chopra, V. (2015) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.06.015 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Mobile Health Devices as Tools for Worldwide Cardiovascular Risk Reduction and Disease Management
Piette, J. D., List, J. M., Rana, G., Townsend, W. A., Striplin, D., & Heisler, M. (2015) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.114.008723 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Smartphone interventions for long-term health management of chronic diseases: an integrative review
Wang, J., Wang, Y., Wei, C., Yao, N. (., Yuan, A., Shan, Y., & Yuan, C. (2014) · Telemedicine and e-Health · doi:10.1089/tmj.2013.0243 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
The use of mobile apps to improve nutrition outcomes: A systematic literature review
DiFilippo, K. N., Huang, W. D., Andrade, J. E., & Chapman‐Novakofski, K. (2015) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1177/1357633x15572203 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Mastellos, N., Gunn, L. H., Felix, L. M., Car, J., & Majeed, A. (2014) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008066.pub3 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Using an electronic activity monitor system as an intervention modality: A systematic review
Lewis, Z. H., Lyons, E., Jarvis, J. M., & Baillargeon, J. (2015) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-015-1947-3 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Balatsoukas, P., Kennedy, C. M., Buchan, I. E., powell, J. A., & Ainsworth, J. D. (2015) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.3662 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Maher, C., Ferguson, M., Vandelanotte, C., Plotnikoff, R., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., Thomas, S., Nelson-Field, K., & Olds, T. (2015) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.4086 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Smartphone Applications for Promoting Healthy Diet and Nutrition: A Literature Review.
Coughlin, S. S., Whitehead, M. S., Sheats, J. Q., Mastromonico, J., Hardy, D. S., & Smith, S. A. (2015) · PubMed · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Haughton, C. F., Silfee, V., Wang, M. L., Lopez‐Cepero, A. A., Estabrook, D. P., Frisard, C., Rosal, M. C., Pagoto, S., & Lemon, S. C. (2018) · Preventive Medicine Reports · doi:10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.01.012 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
(2016) · PubMed · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Kaplan, R. M., & Stone, A. A. (2013) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143736 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Turner‐McGrievy, G. M., & Tate, D. F. (2013) · Translational Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s13142-012-0183-y · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Self-citationAbaza, H., & Marschollek, M. (2017) · Methods of Information in Medicine · doi:10.3414/me17-05-0003 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Palmer, M., Sutherland, J., Barnard, S., Wynne, A., Rezel, E., Doel, A., Grigsby-Duffy, L., Edwards, S., Russell, S., Hotopf, E., et al. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0189801 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Adapting behavioral interventions for social media delivery
Pagoto, S., Waring, M. E., May, C. N., Ding, E. Y., Kunz, W. H., Hayes, R., & Oleski, J. L. (2016) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.5086 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Petkovic, J., Duench, S., Trawin, J., Dewidar, O., Pardo, J. P., Simeon, R., DesMeules, M., Gagnon, D., Roberts, J. H., Hossain, A., et al. (2021) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd012932.pub2 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Pham, Q., Graham, G., Carrion, C., Morita, P. P., Seto, E., Stinson, J. N., & Cafazzo, J. A. (2019) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/11941 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Patel, M. L., Hopkins, C. M., Brooks, T. L., & Bennett, G. G. (2019) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/12209 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
The Role of Social Media in Online Weight Management: Systematic Review
Chang, T., Chopra, V., Zhang, C., & Woolford, S. J. (2013) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.2852 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Lyzwinski, L. N. (2014) · Journal of Personalized Medicine · doi:10.3390/jpm4030311 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Tate, D. F., Lyons, E., & Valle, C. G. (2015) · Diabetes Spectrum · doi:10.2337/diaspect.28.1.45 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Self-citationShi, J. J., Poorisat, T., & Salmon, C. T. (2016) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2016.1242035 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Samoggia, A., & Riedel, B. (2019) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108766 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Martin, C. K., Miller, A. C., Thomas, D. M., Champagne, C. M., Han, H., & Church, T. S. (2015) · Obesity · doi:10.1002/oby.21063 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Use of Mobile Phone App Interventions to Promote Weight Loss: Meta-Analysis
Islam, M. M., Poly, T. N., Walther, B. A., & (Jack) Li, Y.-C. (2020) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/17039 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Khoury, C. F. E., Karavetian, M., Halfens, R. J. G., Crutzen, R., Khoja, L., & Schols, J. M. G. A. (2019) · Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics · doi:10.1016/j.jand.2018.11.010 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Mason, A. E., Jhaveri, K., Cohn, M., & Brewer, J. A. (2018) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10865-017-9884-5 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Liu, F., Kong, X., Cao, J., Chen, S., Li, C., Huang, J., Gu, D., & Kelly, T. N. (2015) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwu260 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Smartphone Medical Applications for Women’s Health: What Is the Evidence-Base and Feedback?
Derbyshire, E. J., & Dancey, D. (2013) · International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications · doi:10.1155/2013/782074 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Turner‐McGrievy, G. M., Wilcox, S., Boutté, A. K., Hutto, B., Singletary, C. R., Muth, E. R., & Hoover, A. W. (2017) · Obesity · doi:10.1002/oby.21889 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Self-citationNutrition Concepts for the Treatment of Obesity in Adults
Wiechert, M., & Holzapfel, C. (2021) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu14010169 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Peer-Based Social Media Features in Behavior Change Interventions: Systematic Review
Elaheebocus, R., Weal, M. J., Morrison, L. G., & Yardley, L. (2018) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.8342 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Yang, Q. (2017) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10810730.2016.1271065 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Improving Diabetes Management With Mobile Health Technology
Sieverdes, J. C., Treiber, F., Jenkins, C., & Hermayer, K. (2013) · The American Journal of the Medical Sciences · doi:10.1097/maj.0b013e3182896cee · Cited by 87 · see citing works
The SMARTER pilot study: Testing feasibility of real-time feedback for dietary self-monitoring
Burke, L. E., Zheng, Y., Ma, Q., Mancino, J., Loar, I., Music, E., Styn, M. A., Ewing, L. J., French, B. F., Sieworek, D., et al. (2017) · Preventive Medicine Reports · doi:10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.03.017 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Antoun, J., Itani, H., AlArab, N., & Elsehmawy, A. (2022) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/35479 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Turner‐McGrievy, G. M., Dunn, C. G., Wilcox, S., Boutté, A. K., Hutto, B., Hoover, A. W., & Muth, E. R. (2019) · Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics · doi:10.1016/j.jand.2019.03.012 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Self-citationKozak, A. T., Buscemi, J., Hawkins, M. A. W., Wang, M. L., Breland, J. Y., Ross, K. M., & Kommu, A. (2016) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10865-016-9805-z · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Social Media and Health Behavior Change
Laranjo, L. (2016) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-809269-9.00006-2 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Tweeting it off: characteristics of adults who tweet about a weight loss attempt
Pagoto, S., Schneider, K. L., Evans, M. M., Waring, M. E., Appelhans, B. M., Busch, A. M., Whited, M. C., Thind, H. K., & Ziedonis, M. (2014) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002652 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
A Scoping Review of Social Media Use in Social Work Practice
Chan, C. (2015) · Journal of Evidence-Informed Social Work · doi:10.1080/23761407.2015.1052908 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Ptomey, L. T., Sullivan, D. K., Lee, J., Goetz, J. R., Gibson, C., & Donnelly, J. E. (2014) · Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics · doi:10.1016/j.jand.2014.08.031 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Participation of African Americans in e-Health and m-Health Studies: A Systematic Review
James, D. C., Harville, C., Sears, C., Efunbumi, O., & Bondoc, I. (2017) · Telemedicine and e-Health · doi:10.1089/tmj.2016.0067 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Smartphone technology facilitates dietary change in healthy adults
Ipjian, M. L., & Johnston, C. S. (2016) · Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.nut.2016.08.003 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Use of mobile phones as a tool for weight loss: a systematic review
Aguilar, A., Solé‐Sedeño, J., Mancebo, G., Medina, F. X., Carreras, R., & Saigí-Rubió, F. (2014) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1177/1357633x14537777 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Mobile Phone and Web 2.0 Technologies for Weight Management: A Systematic Scoping Review
Bardus, M., Smith, J. R., Samaha, L., & Abraham, C. (2015) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.5129 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Social media and applications to health behavior
Maher, C. A., Ryan, J. C., Kernot, J., Podsiadly, J., & Keenihan, S. H. (2015) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.10.021 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Hales, S. B., Turner‐McGrievy, G. M., Wilcox, S., Fahim, A., Davis, R. E., Huhns, M. N., & Valafar, H. (2016) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.07.003 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Self-citationIncreasing physical activity through mobile device interventions: A systematic review
Muntaner, A., Conti, J. V., & Palou, P. (2015) · Health Informatics Journal · doi:10.1177/1460458214567004 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Smoking Cessation Intervention on Facebook: Which Content Generates the Best Engagement?
Thrul, J., Klein, A. B., & Ramo, D. E. (2015) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.4575 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Du, H., Venkatakrishnan, A., Youngblood, G. M., Ram, A., & Pirolli, P. (2016) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/mhealth.4900 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Historical Roots of Dissemination and Implementation Science
Dearing, J. W., & Kee, K. F. (2012) · Dissemination and Implementation Research in HealthTranslating Science to Practice · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199751877.003.0003 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Social Media and Obesity in Adults: a Review of Recent Research and Future Directions
Waring, M. E., Jake‐Schoffman, D. E., Holovatska, M. M., Mejia, C., Williams, J. C., & Pagoto, S. (2018) · Current Diabetes Reports · doi:10.1007/s11892-018-1001-9 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Use of Mobile Device Applications In Canadian Dietetic Practice
Lieffers, J. R. L., Vance, V., & Hanning, R. M. (2014) · Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research · doi:10.3148/75.1.2014.41 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Ormel, H. L., van der Schoot, G. G. F., Westerink, N.-D. L., Sluiter, W. J., Gietema, J. A., & Walenkamp, A. (2018) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-018-4263-5 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Self-Help for Weight Loss in Overweight and Obese Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Hartmann-Boyce, J., Jebb, S. A., Fletcher, B. R., & Aveyard, P. (2015) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2014.302389 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Social support for physical activity—role of Facebook with and without structured intervention
Cavallo, D. N., Tate, D. F., Ward, D. S., DeVellis, R. F., Thayer, L., & Ammerman, A. S. (2014) · Translational Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s13142-014-0269-9 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Self-citationSmartloss: A Personalized Mobile Health Intervention for Weight Management and Health Promotion
Martin, C. K., Gilmore, L. A., Apolzan, J. W., Myers, C. A., Thomas, D. M., & Redman, L. M. (2016) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/mhealth.5027 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Covolo, L., Ceretti, E., Moneda, M., Castaldi, S., & Gelatti, U. (2017) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2017.07.032 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Crilly, P., & Kayyali, R. (2020) · Pharmacy · doi:10.3390/pharmacy8030137 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Olson, C. M. (2016) · Annual Review of Nutrition · doi:10.1146/annurev-nutr-071715-050815 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Dunn, C. G., Turner‐McGrievy, G. M., Wilcox, S., & Hutto, B. (2019) · Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics · doi:10.1016/j.jand.2019.03.013 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Self-citationTurner-McGrievy, G. M., Hales, S. B., Schoffman, D. E., Valafar, H., Brazendale, K., Weaver, R. G., Beets, M. W., Wirth, M. D., Shivappa, N., Mandes, T., et al. (2017) · Translational Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s13142-016-0448-y · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Self-citationTwitter-Delivered Behavioral Weight-Loss Interventions: A Pilot Series
Pagoto, S., Waring, M. E., Schneider, K. L., Oleski, J. L., Olendzki, E., Hayes, R. B., Appelhans, B. M., Whited, M. C., Busch, A. M., & Lemon, S. C. (2015) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/resprot.4864 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Simeon, R., Dewidar, O., Trawin, J., Duench, S., Manson, H. E., Pardo, J. P., Petkovic, J., Roberts, J. H., Tugwell, P., Yoganathan, M., et al. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/16002 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Kim, M., Kim, Y., Go, Y., Lee, S., Na, M., Lee, Y., Choi, S., & Choi, H. J. (2020) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/14817 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Muntaner‐Mas, A., Conti, J. V., Borràs, P. A., Ortega, F. B., & Palou, P. (2017) · The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness · doi:10.23736/s0022-4707.16.05918-1 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Barkley, J. E., Lepp, A., Santo, A. S., Glickman, E. L., & Dowdell, B. T. (2020) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106313 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Lim, M. S. C., Wright, C. C. J., Carrotte, E. R., & Pedrana, A. E. (2016) · Health Promotion Journal of Australia · doi:10.1071/he16057 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Personal health technology: A new era in cardiovascular disease prevention
Franklin, N. C., Lavie, C. J., & Arena, R. A. (2015) · Postgraduate Medicine · doi:10.1080/00325481.2015.1015396 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Wilcox, S., Liu, J., Addy, C. L., Turner‐McGrievy, G. M., Burgis, J. T., Wingard, E. E., Dahl, A. A., Whitaker, K. M., Schneider, L., & Boutté, A. K. (2018) · Contemporary Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/j.cct.2018.01.008 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Self-citationSeid, A., Fufa, D. D., & Bitew, Z. W. (2024) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2024.1282570 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Lee, J., Nguyen, A. L., Berg, J. P., Amin, A., Bachman, M., Guo, Y., & Evangelista, L. S. (2014) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/mhealth.3196 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Carter, M. C., Burley, V. J., & Cade, J. E. (2017) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/mhealth.4520 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Metzendorf, M., Wieland, L. S., & Richter, B. (2024) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd013591.pub2 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Ryan, J. C., Edney, S. M., & Maher, C. A. (2017) · Translational Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s13142-017-0499-8 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Raber, M. R., Liao, Y., Rara, A., Schembre, S. M., Krause, K. J., Strong, L., Daniel-MacDougall, C., & Basen-Engquist, K. (2021) · Public Health Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s136898002100358x · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Yingling, L., Brooks, A. T., Wallen, G. R., Peters-Lawrence, M. H., McClurkin, M., Cooper-McCann, R., Wiley, K. L., Mitchell, V. M., Saygbe, J. N., Johnson, T. D., et al. (2016) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/mhealth.4489 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Napolitano, M. A., Whiteley, J. A., Mavredes, M. N., Faro, J. M., DiPietro, L., Hayman, L. L., Neighbors, C. J., & Simmens, S. J. (2017) · Contemporary Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/j.cct.2017.06.007 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Zhang, J., Calabrese, C. R., Ding, J., Liu, M., & Zhang, B. (2017) · Mobile Media & Communication · doi:10.1177/2050157917725550 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
- Authors
- Turner-McGrievy, G., & Tate, D.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- ORCID
- Tate, Deborah
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Internet Research
- Publisher
- JMIR Publications Inc.
- Published
- 2011-12-20
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- e120
- ISSN
- 1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3278106
- OpenAlex
- W2081384957
- Semantic Scholar
- 2e8fdafa8ca23f5bfab181efc641e34dbdd1ad7f
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 29.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Keywords
- weight loss, podcasts, mobile health, Twitter, social support, user control, elaboration, overweight adults, digital health interventions, user engagement, user satisfaction
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Diet, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Internet, Electronic Mail, Cell Phone, Webcasts as Topic, Blogging, Weight Reduction Programs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review