Cited by 219Employee Performance and LeadershipJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorOrganizational Change and Leadership

Shedding light on followers' innovation implementation behavior: The role of transformational leadership, commitment to change, and climate for initiative

Michaelis, Björn, Stegmaier, Ralf, Sonntag, Karlheinz·2010·Journal of Managerial Psychology

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to provide a deeper understanding of how transformational leadership relates to followers' innovation implementation behavior, the psychological mechanisms of this relationship, and the role of individual perceptions of climate for initiative. Design/methodology/approach: Perceptual data were collected from 198 employees in lower and middle management positions of a multinational automotive corporation. Relationships were tested using hierarchical regression analysis. Findings: Results demonstrate that transformational leadership was strongly related to followers' innovation implementation behavior and that the nature of this relationship was moderated by followers' levels of perceived climate for initiative. Additionally, commitment to change fully mediated the relationship between transformational leadership and followers' innovation implementation behavior. Research limitations/implications: The paper is based on a cross‐sectional design. A causal interpretation requires studies with experimental or longitudinal designs. Practical implications: Companies should invest in transformational leadership training and in the selection of supervisors with this leadership style before initiating the implementation of innovations. Enhancing contextual factors, such as a perceived climate for initiative, should be promoted by integrating them into organizations' reward systems. Originality/value: The paper is one of the first to investigate the relationship between transformational leadership and followers' innovation implementation behavior. It specifies the organizational contexts under which transformational leadership is most likely related to innovation implementation behavior, and those in which such a relationship is unlikely to occur.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/02683941011035304

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Michaelis, B., Stegmaier, R., & Sonntag, K.
Affiliations
Heidelberg University (DE)
Venue
Journal of Managerial Psychology
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2010-05-04
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
408-429
ISSN
0268-3946 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1557448323
Cited by
219
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 9
FWCI
19.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Managerial Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Library Osnabrück University (Hochschule Osnabrück) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Change and Leadership
Keywords
transformational leadership, commitment to change, followers, reward systems, automotive industry, middle managers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review