Cited by 487Fire effects on ecosystemsRangeland and Wildlife ManagementDisaster Management and Resilience

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Expansion of the US wildland–urban interface

Theobald, David M., Romme, William H.·2007·Landscape and Urban Planning

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.06.002

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 74 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. DellaSala, 2001, An updated protected areas database for the United States and Canada, Nat. Areas J., 21, 124
  2. Duchesne, L.C., Hawkes, B.C., 2000. Fire in northern ecosystems. In: Brown, J.K., Smith, J.K. (Eds.), Wildland fire in ecosystems: effects of fire on flora. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-42, vol. 2, pp. 35–51.
  3. Federal Register, 2001a. Federal Register Notes 66(3), pp. 751–777, January 4, 2001.
  4. Federal Register, 2001b. Federal Register Notes 66(160), pp. 43383–43435, August 17, 2001.
  5. Flamm, 2001, Applying a variable-shape spatial filter to map relative abundance of manatees (Trichechus manatus latirostris), Landscape Ecol., 16, 279, 10.1023/A:1011182302522 · DOI
  6. Paysen, T.E., Ansley, R.J., Brown, J.K., Gottfried, G.J., Haase, S.M., Harrington, M.G., Narog, M.G., Sackett, S.S., Wilson, R.C., 2000. Fire in western shrubland, woodland, and grassland ecosystems. In: Brown, J.K., Smith, J.K. (Eds.), Wildland fire in ecosystems: effects of fire on flora. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-42, vol. 2, pp. 121–159.
  7. Shands, 1991, Problems and prospects at the urban-forest interface: land uses and expectations are in transition, J. Forest., 89, 23
  8. Vaux, 1982, Forestry's hotseat: the urban/forest interface, Am. Forests, 88, 37
  9. Veblen, T.T., 2003. Key issues in fire regime research for fuels management and ecological restoration. In: Omi, P.N., Joyce, L.A. (Technical editors), Fire, fuel treatments, and ecological restoration. Conference Proceedings, 16–18 April 2002, Fort Collins, CO. USDA Forest Service Proceedings RMRS-P-29, pp. 259–275.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Theobald, D. M., & Romme, W. H.
Affiliations
Colorado State University (US)
Corresponding author
Theobald, David M.
Venue
Landscape and Urban Planning
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-12
Volume
83
Issue
4
Pages
340-354
ISSN
0169-2046 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2035809484
Cited by
487
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 32
FWCI
12.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Landscape and Urban Planning (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
Keywords
wildland-urban interface, low-density residential development, national forest management, wildfire hazard, housing density, fire suppression, lodgepole pine forests, ponderosa pine forests, land use change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review