Cited by 487Workplace Violence and BullyingJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorEmployee Performance and Management

An investigation of abusive supervision as a predictor of performance and the meaning of work as a moderator of the relationship.

Harris, Kenneth J., Kacmar, K. Michele, Zivnuska, Suzanne·2007·The Leadership Quarterly

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.03.007

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Abusive supervision is linked to lower follower job performance, including reduced core task performance and reduced organizational citizenship behavior.

    “Abusive supervision has also been linked to lower follower job performance, both with respect to reduced core task performance as well as reduced organizational citizenship behavior (Zellars et al., 2002; Aryee et al., 2007; Harris et al., 2007; Tepper, 2007; Xu et al., 2012; Schyns and Schilling, 2013).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harris, K. J., Kacmar, K. M., & Zivnuska, S.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University Southeast (US)
  • University of Alabama (US)
  • California State University, Chico (US)
Corresponding author
Harris, Kenneth J.
Venue
The Leadership Quarterly
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-06
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
252-263
ISSN
1048-9843 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1966052995
Cited by
487
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 24
FWCI
32.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Leadership Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Workplace Violence and Bullying
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Employee Performance and Management
Keywords
abusive supervision, employee performance, meaning of work, moderating effect, supervisor-subordinate dyads, supervisor ratings, self-perceived performance, automotive industry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review