The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring spontaneous and instructed evaluation processes during Web search: Integrating concurrent thinking-aloud protocols and eye-tracking data
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Interestingly, many authors, who deal with think-aloud, also recommend combining them with eye-tracking [47,54,64,65,67,71].”
From Impact of Think-Aloud on Eye-Tracking: A Comparison of Concurrent and Retrospective Think-Aloud for Research on Decision-Making in the Game Environment (2020) · cites this paper as [71]
In the citing paper
“Gerjets et al. [71] state that eye-tracking brings an extension of think-aloud findings by pieces of evidence of fine-grained or implicit cognitive processes.”
From Impact of Think-Aloud on Eye-Tracking: A Comparison of Concurrent and Retrospective Think-Aloud for Research on Decision-Making in the Game Environment (2020) · cites this paper as [71]
In the citing paper
“Many authors recommend using a combination of verbal protocols and eye-tracking to investigate cognitive processes [47,54,64,65,67,71]”
From Impact of Think-Aloud on Eye-Tracking: A Comparison of Concurrent and Retrospective Think-Aloud for Research on Decision-Making in the Game Environment (2020) · cites this paper as [71]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research
Rayner, K. (1998) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372 · Cited by 7,979
Accurately interpreting clickthrough data as implicit feedback
Joachims, T., Granka, L., Pan, B., Hembrooke, H., & Gay, G. (2005) · Proceedings of the 28th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval · doi:10.1145/1076034.1076063 · Cited by 1,408
In Google We Trust: Users’ Decisions on Rank, Position, and Relevance
Pan, B., Hembrooke, H., Joachims, T., Lorigo, L., Gay, G., & Granka, L. (2007) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00351.x · Cited by 715 · cited 3×
“the first few links on the top of a SERP (Cutrell & Guan, 2007; Granka, Joachims, & Gay, 2004; Guan & Cutrell, 2007; Joachims et al., 2005; Pan et al., 2007).”
What are you looking for?: an eye-tracking study of information usage in web search
Cutrell, E., & Guan, Z. (2007) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1240624.1240690 · Cited by 460
How users assess Web pages for information seeking
Tombros, A., Ruthven, I., & Jose, J. M. (2005) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20106 · Cited by 202
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- Borlund, 2003, The concept of relevance in IR, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54, 913, 10.1002/asi.10286 · DOI · Paper page
- Brand-Gruwel, 2008, Instructional support for enhancing students' information problem solving ability, Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 615, 10.1016/j.chb.2007.01.020 · DOI
- Brand-Gruwel, 2005, Information problem solving by experts and novices: analysis of a complex cognitive skill, Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 487, 10.1016/j.chb.2004.10.005 · DOI · Paper page
- Brumby, 2008, Strategies for guiding interactive search: an empirical investigation into the consequences of label relevance for assessment and selection, Human-Computer Interaction, 23, 1, 10.1080/07370020701851078 · DOI
- Crystal, 2006, Relevance criteria identified by health information users during web searches, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57, 1368, 10.1002/asi.20436 · DOI
- De Koning, 2010, Attention guidance in learning from complex animation: seeing is understanding?, Learning and Instruction, 20, 111, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.010 · DOI · Paper page
- Gerjets, 2008, Competent information search in the World Wide Web: development and evaluation of a web training for pupils, Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 693, 10.1016/j.chb.2007.01.029 · DOI
- Jarodzka, 2010, In the eyes of the beholder: how experts and novices interpret dynamic stimuli, Learning and Instruction, 20, 146, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.019 · DOI · Paper page
- Maglaughlin, 2002, User perspectives on relevance criteria: a comparison among relevant, partially relevant, and not-relevant judgments, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53, 327, 10.1002/asi.10049 · DOI
- Miller, 2004, Modeling information navigation: implications for information architecture, Human-Computer Interaction, 19, 225, 10.1207/s15327051hci1903_2 · DOI
- Pirolli, 1999, Information foraging, Psychological Review, 106, 643, 10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.643 · DOI · Paper page
- Rieh, 2002, Judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the web, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53, 145, 10.1002/asi.10017 · DOI · Paper page
- Rouet, 1997, Studying and using multiple documents in history: effects of discipline expertise, Cognition and Instruction, 15, 85, 10.1207/s1532690xci1501_3 · DOI
- Savolainen, 2005, User-defined relevance criteria in web searching, Journal of Documentation, 62, 685, 10.1108/00220410610714921 · DOI
- Stadtler, 2007, Dealing with multiple documents on the WWW: the role of metacognition in the formation of documents models, Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2, 191, 10.1007/s11412-007-9015-3 · DOI
- Sundar, 2007, News cues: information scent and cognitive heuristics, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 366, 10.1002/asi.20511 · DOI · Paper page
- Van Gog, 2005, Uncovering expertise-related differences in troubleshooting performance: combining eye movement and concurrent verbal protocol data, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 205, 10.1002/acp.1112 · DOI
- Van Gog, 2005, Uncovering the problem solving process: cued retrospective reporting versus concurrent and retrospective reporting, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11, 237, 10.1037/1076-898X.11.4.237 · DOI · Paper page
- Wilson, 1999, Models in information behaviour research, Journal of Documentation, 55, 249, 10.1108/EUM0000000007145 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Procrastination and self-efficacy: tracing vicious and virtuous circles in self-regulated learning.
Wäschle, K., Allgaier, A., Lachner, A., Fink, S., & Nückles, M. (2014) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.09.005 · Cited by 252
Toward an Integrated Framework of Multiple Text Use
List, A., & Alexander, P. A. (2019) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2018.1505514 · Cited by 147
Kammerer, Y., Bråten, I., Gerjets, P., & Strømsø, H. I. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.012 · Cited by 129
Self-citationStadtler, M., Scharrer, L., Brummernhenrich, B., & Bromme, R. (2013) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1080/07370008.2013.769996 · Cited by 126
Balatsoukas, P., & Ruthven, I. (2012) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.22707 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Gerjets, P., Kammerer, Y., & Werner, B.
- Venue
- Learning and Instruction
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-04
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 220-231
- ISSN
- 0959-4752
- Cited by
- 139
- References
- 5
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
