Cited by 223Innovation and Knowledge ManagementInternational Business and FDIInternational Student and Expatriate Challenges

Exploring the Paradox of Competence-creating Subsidiaries: Balancing Bandwidth and Dispersion in MNEs

Open access
Narula, Rajneesh·2014·Long Range Planning

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.lrp.2013.10.006

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 80 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Narula, R.
Affiliations
University of Reading (GB)
Corresponding author
Narula, Rajneesh
Venue
Long Range Planning
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-02
Volume
47
Issue
1-2
Pages
4-15
ISSN
0024-6301 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1971714333
Cited by
223
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
34.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Long Range Planning (publishedVersion)
  • UNU Collections (United Nations University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › International Business and FDI
  • Social Sciences › Communication › International Student and Expatriate Challenges
Keywords
multinational corporations, firm-specific advantages, knowledge flows, knowledge integration, coordination, market failure, subsidiary networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review