Cited by 69Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesPersonality Traits and PsychologyResilience and Mental Health

Personality as a Predictor of Coping Efforts in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis

Rätsep, T, Kallasmaa, T, Pulver, A, Gross-Paju, K·2000·Multiple Sclerosis Journal

Abstract

The aim of the study was to explore personality traits as predictors of coping with disease-related distress in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). All patients with clinically definite MS in a city with a population of approximately 100000 were asked to complete the NEO Personality Inventory and a multidimensional coping inventory (COPE). There was an 83% response rate yielding 49 patients for the study population and 49 controls, matched for age, gender and educational level to the MS-patients, were used as comparison. Only Neuroticism correlated significantly with emotion-focused coping in both groups. Extraversion and Openness to Experience were linked to task-oriented coping strategies in normal controls but not in the MS-group. Agreeableness was associated with avoidance-oriented coping strategies only in the MS-group. Thus, the relation of certain personality characteristics to the choice of strategies for coping with the disease-related distress appear to differ from coping with stressful problems in everyday life. As dispositional characteristics may interfere with adaptive coping responses, analysis of personality traits and coping strategies could contribute while attempting to relieve the consequences of chronic disease on everyday life.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/135245850000600607

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rätsep, T., Kallasmaa, T., Pulver, A., & Gross-Paju, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Tartu (EE)
  • Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University of Tartu, Tartu 51014, Estonia, Multiple Sclerosis Center, Estonian Seamen Hospital, Tallinn 10617, Estonia
Venue
Multiple Sclerosis Journal
Published
2000-12
Volume
6
Issue
6
Pages
397-402
ISSN
  • 1352-4585 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0970
OpenAlex
W2035001177
Cited by
69
References
43
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Multiple Sclerosis Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, personality traits, coping strategies, neuroticism, extraversion, openness to experience, agreeableness, emotion-focused coping, task-oriented coping, avoidance coping, NEO Personality Inventory, COPE Inventory
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personality, Personality Assessment, Personality Tests, Predictive Value of Tests, Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive, Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review