Cited by 94Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Disrupted brain connectome in semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia

Agosta, Federica, Galantucci, Sebastiano, Valsasina, Paola, Canu, Elisa, Meani, Alessandro, Marcone, Alessandra, Magnani, Giuseppe, Falini, Andrea +2 more·2014·Neurobiology of Aging

Abstract

Using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging and graph analysis, the topological organization of the functional brain network connectivity was explored in patients with left-sided onset semantic variant (SV) of primary progressive aphasia relative to healthy controls. Functional brain networks in SV patients were characterized by a significantly lower mean network degree, clustering coefficient, and global efficiency, longer characteristic path length and higher assortativity compared with controls. SV patients showed also a strongly left-lateralized loss of hubs, and reduced nodal degree in the inferior and ventral temporal regions and occipital cortices. In SV, the decreased nodal degree extended into the medial and ventral frontal cortex bilaterally, left amygdala and/or hippocampus, and left caudate nucleus. These findings provide evidence that the focal structural degeneration of the inferior temporal, and perysilvian language regions in SV patients ultimately results in a distributed pattern of functional connectivity abnormalities. The local network analysis shows that SV is associated with a functional degradation in the "pan-modal" inferior and/or ventral temporal regions, and the "modality-specific" visual cortical origin of the ventral processing pathway.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.05.017

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Agosta, F., Galantucci, S., Valsasina, P., Canu, E., Meani, A., Marcone, A., Magnani, G., Falini, A., Comi, G., & Filippi, M.
Affiliations
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT)
Corresponding author
Filippi, Massimo
Venue
Neurobiology of Aging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-11
Volume
35
Issue
11
Pages
2646-2655
ISSN
0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2151116038
Cited by
94
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1
FWCI
5.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele (submittedVersion)
Funders
Italian Ministry of Health (GR-2010-2303035)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
semantic dementia, brain connectome, resting-state functional connectivity, network topology, network hubs, inferior temporal cortex, ventral stream, left lateralization, graph theory, clustering coefficient, global efficiency, path length, assortativity
MeSH terms
Aged, Aphasia, Brain, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Neural Pathways, Occipital Lobe, Temporal Lobe, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review