Cited by 241Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMemory and Neural MechanismsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Uncertainty during anticipation modulates neural responses to aversion in human insula and amygdala

Open access
Sarinopoulos, I., Grupe, D. W., Mackiewicz, K. L., Herrington, J. D., Lor, M., Steege, E. E., Nitschke, J. B.·2010·Cerebral Cortex

Abstract

Uncertainty about potential negative future outcomes can cause stress and is a central feature of anxiety disorders. The stress and anxiety associated with uncertain situations may lead individuals to overestimate the frequency with which uncertain cues are followed by negative outcomes, an example of covariation bias. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we found that uncertainty-related expectations modulated neural responses to aversion. Insula and amygdala responses to aversive pictures were larger after an uncertain cue (that preceded aversive or neutral pictures) than a certain cue (that always preceded aversive pictures). Anticipatory anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) activity elicited by the cues was inversely associated with the insula and amygdala responses to aversive pictures following the cues. Nearly 75% of subjects overestimated the frequency of aversive pictures following uncertain cues, and ACC and insula activity predicted this uncertainty-related covariation bias. Findings provide the first evidence of the brain mechanisms of covariation bias and highlight the temporal dynamics of ACC, insula, and amygdala recruitment for processing aversion in the context of uncertainty.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cercor/bhp155

Cites

114 of 114 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AIC responses to expected aversive stimuli are larger if expectations are uncertain.

    “AIC responses to expected aversive stimuli are larger if expectations are uncertain”

    From An Interoceptive Predictive Coding Model of Conscious Presence (2012) · cites this paper as Sarinopoulos et al., 2010

    The Discussion reports larger responses to aversive pictures after uncertain than certain cues, but locates this effect in the mid-insula, not the anterior insular cortex (AIC). The Brain Activation to Aversion and Uncertainty section instead reports greater left anterior-insula activity while anticipating the certain aversive cue. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Insula and amygdala responses were larger after an uncertain cue than a certain cue.

    “In their study, insula and amygdala responses were larger after an uncertain cue than a certain cue.”
  • Instructed fear studies examining anticipation of and responses to briefly presented aversive pictures revealed dorsal amygdala activation when aversive events were predictably signaled.

    “Studies of instructed fear that have examined neural activity underlying both anticipation of and responses to briefly presented aversive pictures have also revealed dorsal amygdala activation (Mackiewicz et al., 2006; Nitschke et al., 2006), provided that the aversive events are predictably signaled (Sarinopoulos et al., 2010).”

    From Phasic and sustained fear in humans elicits distinct patterns of brain activity (2011) · cites this paper as Sarinopoulos et al., 2010

  • Sources in the insula and amygdala corroborate imaging results, specifically uncertainty-related amygdalar hyperactivity in pediatric anxiety.

    “Particularly, sources in the insula and amygdala, known to process subjective salience (Davis, & Whalen, 2001;Straube, & Miltner, 2011), corroborate imaging results, specifically uncertainty-related amygdalar hyperactivity in pediatric anxiety (Sarinopoulos et al., 2010;Williams et al., 2015).”

    From Uncertainty increases neural indices of attention in obsessive-compulsive disorder (2017) · cites this paper as Sarinopoulos et al., 2010

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. LeDoux JE. 2002. The synaptic self. New York: Viking Penguin.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sarinopoulos, I., Grupe, D. W., Mackiewicz, K. L., Herrington, J. D., Lor, M., Steege, E. E., & Nitschke, J. B.
Affiliations
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • West Virginia University (US)
Venue
Cerebral Cortex
Published
2009-08-13
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
929-940
ISSN
  • 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2199
OpenAlex
W2138497717
Cited by
241
References
114
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 17
FWCI
6.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cerebral Cortex (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Waisman Center (HD03352)
  • National Institutes of Health (5k02mh082130-05)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K02‑MH082130, P30-HD03352, R01MH074847, K08MH063984, R01-MH74847, K08-MH63984)
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P30HD03352, HD03352)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P30HD03352., P30HD003352)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
uncertainty, anticipation, aversion, insula, amygdala, anterior cingulate cortex, anxiety, stress, aversive stimuli, expectations, temporal dynamics of neural responses
MeSH terms
Affect, Amygdala, Avoidance Learning, Brain Mapping, Cues, Female, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Oxygen, Photic Stimulation, Uncertainty, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review