Cited by 470Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Diminishing Risk-Taking Behavior by Modulating Activity in the Prefrontal Cortex: A Direct Current Stimulation Study

Open access
Fecteau, Shirley, Knoch, Daria, Fregni, Felipe, Sultani, Natasha, Boggio, Paulo, Pascual-Leone, Alvaro·2007·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Studies have shown increased risk taking in healthy individuals after low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, known to transiently suppress cortical excitability, over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). It appears, therefore, plausible that differential modulation of DLPFC activity, increasing the right while decreasing the left, might lead to decreased risk taking, which could hold clinical relevance as excessively risky decision making is observed in clinical populations leading to deleterious consequences. The goal of the present study was to investigate whether risk-taking behaviors could be decreased using concurrent anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the right DLPFC, which allows upregulation of brain activity, with cathodal tDCS of the left DLPCF, which downregulates activity. Thirty-six healthy volunteers performed the risk task while they received either anodal over the right with cathodal over the left DLPFC, anodal over the left with cathodal over the right DLPFC, or sham stimulation. We hypothesized that right anodal/left cathodal would decrease risk-taking behavior compared with left anodal/right cathodal or sham stimulation. As predicted, during right anodal/left cathodal stimulation over the DLPFC, participants chose more often the safe prospect compared with the other groups. Moreover, these participants appeared to be insensitive to the reward associated with the prospects. These findings support the notion that the interhemispheric balance of activity across the DLPFCs is critical in decision-making behaviors. Most importantly, the observed suppression of risky behaviors suggests that populations with boundless risk-taking behaviors leading to negative real-life consequences, such as individuals with addiction, might benefit from such neuromodulation-based approaches.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.3283-07.2007

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In healthy people, tDCS alters inhibitory control, planning, delay discounting, and risk taking.

    “Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is another promising, low-risk, noninvasive neuromodulation technique that has effects on inhibitory control, planning, delay discounting, and risk taking in healthy individuals (289-291).”

    From A brain-centric model of suicidal behavior (2020) · cites this paper as [291]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Bechara A, Tranel D, Damasio AR (2002) The somatic marker hypothesis and decision-making. In: Handbook of neuropsychology: frontal lobes, Vol 7, Ed 2 (Boller F, Grafman J, eds), pp 117-143. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fecteau, S., Knoch, D., Fregni, F., Sultani, N., Boggio, P., & Pascual-Leone, A.
Affiliations
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (BR)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2007-11-14
Volume
27
Issue
46
Pages
12500-12505
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2170148494
Cited by
470
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 28
FWCI
11.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (RR 01032, RO1-EY12091)
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH069898)
  • National Eye Institute (R01 EY12091, R01EY012091)
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01 DC 05672, R01DC005672)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R03DK071851)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01-NS 47754, R01 NS 20068, R01NS047754)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB005047)
  • National Center for Research Resources (K24RR018875, M01-RR-01032, M01RR001032, MO1-RR01032)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
risk-taking, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, transcranial direct current stimulation, anodal stimulation, cathodal stimulation, interhemispheric balance, decision-making, decision making under risk, reward sensitivity, neuromodulation, addiction
MeSH terms
Adult, Behavior, Mental Disorders, Corpus Callosum, Decision Making, Electric Stimulation, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Judgment, Functional Laterality, Male, Neural Inhibition, Neural Pathways, Reward, Risk-Taking, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review