Cited by 89Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFace Recognition and PerceptionVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Atypical neural substrates of embedded figures task performance in children with autism spectrum disorder

Open access
Lee, Philip S., Foss-Feig, Jennifer, Henderson, Joshua G., Kenworthy, Lauren E., Gilotty, Lisa, Gaillard, William D., Vaidya, Chandan J.·2007·NeuroImage

Abstract

Superior performance on the Embedded Figures Task (EFT) has been attributed to weak central coherence in perceptual processing in Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). The present study used functional magnetic resonance imaging to examine the neural basis of EFT performance in 7- to 12-year-old ASD children and age- and IQ-matched controls. ASD children activated only a subset of the distributed network of regions activated in controls. In frontal cortex, control children activated left dorsolateral, medial and dorsal premotor regions whereas ASD children only activated the dorsal premotor region. In parietal and occipital cortices, activation was bilateral in control children but unilateral (left superior parietal and right occipital) in ASD children. Further, extensive bilateral ventral temporal activation was observed in control, but not ASD children. ASD children performed the EFT at the same level as controls but with reduced cortical involvement, suggesting that disembedded visual processing is accomplished parsimoniously by ASD relative to typically developing brains.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.013

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Manjaly et al. (2007) and Lee et al. (2007) have also reported unusual brain activations in ASD groups whilst they performed the EFT, or an analogue thereof.

    “Manjaly et al. (2007) and Lee et al. (2007) have also reported unusual brain activations in ASD groups whilst they performed the EFT, or an analogue thereof.”

    From Vision in autism spectrum disorders (2009) · cites this paper as Lee et al. (2007)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, P. S., Foss-Feig, J., Henderson, J. G., Kenworthy, L. E., Gilotty, L., Gaillard, W. D., & Vaidya, C. J.
Affiliations
  • Georgetown University (US)
  • Children's National (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Vaidya, Chandan J.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-10
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
184-193
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2067494936
Cited by
89
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 11
FWCI
2.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH065395)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01RR020359)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, weak central coherence, neural correlates, dorsal premotor cortex, superior parietal cortex, occipital cortex, ventral temporal cortex, frontal cortex, children, brain activation patterns
MeSH terms
Autistic Disorder, Brain, Brain Mapping, Child, Cognition Disorders, Evoked Potentials, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Task Performance and Analysis, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review