Cited by 336Action Observation and SynchronizationChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentFace Recognition and Perception

Live face-to-face interaction during fMRI: A new tool for social cognitive neuroscience

Open access
Redcay, Elizabeth, Dodell-Feder, David, Pearrow, Mark J., Mavros, Penelope L., Kleiner, Mario, Gabrieli, John D.E., Saxe, Rebecca·2010·NeuroImage

Abstract

Cooperative social interaction is critical for human social development and learning. Despite the importance of social interaction, previous neuroimaging studies lack two fundamental components of everyday face-to-face interactions: contingent responding and joint attention. In the current studies, functional MRI data were collected while participants interacted with a human experimenter face-to-face via live video feed as they engaged in simple cooperative games. In Experiment 1, participants engaged in a live interaction with the experimenter ("Live") or watched a video of the same interaction ("Recorded"). During the "Live" interaction, as compared to the Recorded conditions, greater activation was seen in brain regions involved in social cognition and reward, including the right temporoparietal junction (rTPJ), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), right superior temporal sulcus (rSTS), ventral striatum, and amygdala. Experiment 2 isolated joint attention, a critical component of social interaction. Participants either followed the gaze of the live experimenter to a shared target of attention ("Joint Attention") or found the target of attention alone while the experimenter was visible but not sharing attention ("Solo Attention"). The right temporoparietal junction and right posterior STS were differentially recruited during Joint, as compared to Solo, attention. These findings suggest the rpSTS and rTPJ are key regions for both social interaction and joint attention. This method of allowing online, contingent social interactions in the scanner could open up new avenues of research in social cognitive neuroscience, both in typical and atypical populations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.052

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Posterior divisions of the right STG are implicated in perception of intentional movements such as eye gaze, salience of acoustic cues, prediction of reward based on other agents' strategies, and live face-to-face interactions.

    “Posterior divisions of the right STG (pSTG) have been implicated in perception of intentional movements such as eye gaze (81), salience of acoustic cues (82;83), prediction of reward based on other agents’ strategies (84), and live face-to-face interactions (85).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Redcay, E., Dodell-Feder, D., Pearrow, M. J., Mavros, P. L., Kleiner, M., Gabrieli, J. D. E., & Saxe, R.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics (DE)
Corresponding author
Redcay, Elizabeth
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-05
Volume
50
Issue
4
Pages
1639-1647
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2123238737
Cited by
336
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 36
FWCI
37.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (F32HD059302)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
face-to-face interaction, joint attention, social cognition, temporoparietal junction, superior temporal sulcus, anterior cingulate cortex, amygdala, ventral striatum, reward processing, gaze following, cooperative games
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Attention, Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Games, Experimental, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Photic Stimulation, Video Recording, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review