Cited by 919Action Observation and SynchronizationChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentFace Recognition and Perception

Uniquely human social cognition

Saxe, Rebecca·2006·Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Abstract

Recent data identify distinct components of social cognition associated with five brain regions. In posterior temporal cortex, the extrastriate body area is associated with perceiving the form of other human bodies. A nearby region in the posterior superior temporal sulcus is involved in interpreting the motions of a human body in terms of goals. A distinct region at the temporo-parietal junction supports the uniquely human ability to reason about the contents of mental states. Medial prefrontal cortex is divided into at least two subregions. Ventral medial prefrontal cortex is implicated in emotional empathy, whereas dorsal medial prefrontal cortex is implicated in the uniquely human representation of triadic relations between two minds and an object, supporting shared attention and collaborative goals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.conb.2006.03.001

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some social cognition regions important for empathy were significantly activated in a paradigm using photographs of older own vs other children (5-12 years), including anterior paracingulate, posterior cingulate, and superior temporal sulcus (Leibenluft et al., 2004; Saxe, 2006).

    “Some social cognition regions which are important for empathy were significantly activated in this paradigm, including anterior paracingulate, posterior cingulate and superior temporal sulcus (Saxe, 2006).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saxe, R.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Saxe, Rebecca
Venue
Current Opinion in Neurobiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-04
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
235-239
ISSN
0959-4388 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2000917789
Cited by
919
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 55 · 2014: 64 · 2013: 67 · 2012: 55
FWCI
6.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
social cognition, human uniqueness, extrastriate body area, posterior superior temporal sulcus, temporoparietal junction, medial prefrontal cortex, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, theory of mind, joint attention, affective empathy, triadic relationships
MeSH terms
Animals, Cerebral Cortex, Cognition, Emotions, Humans, Neural Pathways, Neuropsychology, Parietal Lobe, Social Behavior, Temporal Lobe, Thinking, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review