Cited by 155Action Observation and SynchronizationNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeuroendocrine regulation and behavior

Why we interact: on the functional role of the striatum in the subjective experience of social interaction

Open access
Pfeiffer, Ulrich J., Schilbach, Leonhard, Timmermans, Bert, Kuzmanovic, Bojana, Georgescu, Alexandra L., Bente, Gary, Vogeley, Kai·2014·NeuroImage

Abstract

There is ample evidence that human primates strive for social contact and experience interactions with conspecifics as intrinsically rewarding. Focusing on gaze behavior as a crucial means of human interaction, this study employed a unique combination of neuroimaging, eye-tracking, and computer-animated virtual agents to assess the neural mechanisms underlying this component of behavior. In the interaction task, participants believed that during each interaction the agent's gaze behavior could either be controlled by another participant or by a computer program. Their task was to indicate whether they experienced a given interaction as an interaction with another human participant or the computer program based on the agent's reaction. Unbeknownst to them, the agent was always controlled by a computer to enable a systematic manipulation of gaze reactions by varying the degree to which the agent engaged in joint attention. This allowed creating a tool to distinguish neural activity underlying the subjective experience of being engaged in social and non-social interaction. In contrast to previous research, this allows measuring neural activity while participants experience active engagement in real-time social interactions. Results demonstrate that gaze-based interactions with a perceived human partner are associated with activity in the ventral striatum, a core component of reward-related neurocircuitry. In contrast, interactions with a computer-driven agent activate attention networks. Comparisons of neural activity during interaction with behaviorally naïve and explicitly cooperative partners demonstrate different temporal dynamics of the reward system and indicate that the mere experience of engagement in social interaction is sufficient to recruit this system.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.061

Cites

97 of 97 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Functional MRI studies show that experiencing partial components of positive social interactions-such as real-time eye gaze sharing, hearing laughter after a joke, or observing videos from someone with a shared intention-activates neural reward systems in ways similar to non-social rewards like monetary rewards.

    “Functional MRI studies have shown that experiencing partial components of positive social interactions such as real time sharing of eye gaze,67 hearing someone laugh after a telling a joke,68 and observing videos from someone who has a shared intention,69 activates neural reward systems in similar ways as do non-social rewards (eg, monetary rewards).”
  • These regions reflect a broad integrated set of regions that support coordinated functioning of vision, attention, task control, and-along with subcortical and cingulate regions-motivation and reward signals.

    “These regions reflect a broad integrated set of regions that support the coordinated functioning of vision, attention, task control, and—along with subcortical and cingulate regions (Schilbach et al. 2010; Pfeiffer et al. 2014; Oberwelland et al. 2016)—motivation and reward signals.”

    From Joint attention and brain functional connectivity in infants and toddlers (2017) · cites this paper as Pfeiffer et al. 2014

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pfeiffer, U. J., Schilbach, L., Timmermans, B., Kuzmanovic, B., Georgescu, A. L., Bente, G., & Vogeley, K.
Affiliations
  • Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE)
  • University Hospital Cologne (DE)
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
  • University of Cologne (DE)
Corresponding author
Pfeiffer, Ulrich J.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-11
Volume
101
Pages
124-137
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1970167643
Cited by
155
References
96
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 1
FWCI
22.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) (publishedVersion)
  • Aberdeen University Research Archive (Aberdeen University) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Köln Fortune Program of the Medical Faculty at the University of Cologne
  • German Ministry of Research and Education
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
Keywords
social interaction, ventral striatum, reward processing, gaze behavior, joint attention, virtual agents, attentional networks, social motivation
MeSH terms
Adult, Cooperative Behavior, Eye Movements, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Reward, User-Computer Interface, Prefrontal Cortex, Eye Movement Measurements, Young Adult, Functional Neuroimaging, Ventral Striatum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review