Cited by 815Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentAction Observation and SynchronizationSocial Robot Interaction and HRI

It's the Thought That Counts: Specific Brain Regions for One Component of Theory of Mind

Saxe, Rebecca, Powell, Lindsey J.·2006·Psychological Science

Abstract

Evidence from developmental psychology suggests that representing the contents of other people's thoughts and beliefs depends on a component of reasoning about other minds (theory of mind) that is distinct from the earlier-developing mental-state concepts for goals, perceptions, and feelings. To provide converging evidence, the current study investigated the substrate of the late-developing process in adult brains. Three regions—the right and left temporo-parietal junction and the posterior cingulate—responded selectively when subjects read about a protagonist's thoughts, but not when they read about other subjective, internal states or other socially relevant information about a person. By contrast, the medial prefrontal cortex responded equivalently in all of these story conditions, a result consistent with a broader role for medial prefrontal cortex in general social cognition. These data support the hypothesis that the early- and late-developing components of theory of mind rely on separate psychological and neural mechanisms, and that these mechanisms remain distinct into adulthood.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01768.x

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Even when the stimuli and the subjects' responses are all physically identical, just changing the task instructions from an abstract rule to answering a question about a person's thoughts is sufficient to elicit enhanced recruitment of the RTPJ.

    “Finally, even when the stimuli and the subjects' responses are all physically identical, just changing the task instructions from an abstract rule to answering a question about a person's thoughts is sufficient to elicit enhanced recruitment of the RTPJ [6].”
  • The temporo-parietal regions observed from theory-of-mind, attentional reorienting tasks, and the neglect syndrome all tend to be heavily right-lateralized.

    “First, the temporo-parietal regions observed from theory-of-mind, attentional reorienting tasks, and the neglect syndrome all tend to be heavily right-lateralized (although bilateral activations have also been observed across all 3 research domains; see Corbetta and Shulman 2002;Saxe and Powell 2006).”

    From Activity in Right Temporo-Parietal Junction is Not Selective for Theory-of-Mind (2008) · cites this paper as Saxe and Powell 2006

  • In the theory-of-mind task, the contrast beliefs > photographs identified RTPJ, MPFC, precuneus, and a region of superior frontal gyrus.

    “This contrast identified 3 of the regions previously linked to the theory-of-mind task-RTPJ, MPFC, and precuneus (Saxe and Kanwisher 2003;Saxe and Wexler 2005;Saxe and Powell 2006)-as well as a region of superior frontal gyrus (Fig. 2 and Table 2).”

    From Activity in Right Temporo-Parietal Junction is Not Selective for Theory-of-Mind (2008) · cites this paper as Saxe and Powell 2006

  • The current study comprised the identical theory-of-mind task, was conducted at the same imaging center, used a sample from the same participant population, included the same preprocessing steps, and was analyzed using the same software (SPM99) as Saxe and colleagues.

    “Accordingly, the choice of procedures ensured that the current study comprised the identical theory-of-mind task, was conducted at the same imaging center, used a sample from the same participant population (individuals in the Cambridge/Boston area), included the same preprocessing steps, and was analyzed using the same software (SPM99) as Saxe and colleagues (Saxe and Kanwisher 2003;Saxe and Wexl”

    From Activity in Right Temporo-Parietal Junction is Not Selective for Theory-of-Mind (2008) · cites this paper as Saxe and Powell 2006

  • The theory-of-mind localizer task isolates an RTPJ region that responds more robustly to stories requiring understanding a person's beliefs than to stories requiring understanding physical representation.

    “In each of these studies, the researchers have used a ''theory-ofmind localizer'' task to isolate an RTPJ region that responds more robustly to stories that require understanding a person's beliefs than those that require understanding various modes of physical representation (such as photographs and maps).”

    From Activity in Right Temporo-Parietal Junction is Not Selective for Theory-of-Mind (2008) · cites this paper as Saxe and Powell 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saxe, R., & Powell, L. J.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2006-08
Volume
17
Issue
8
Pages
692-699
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2116526527
Cited by
815
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 77 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 54 · 2012: 57
FWCI
64.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Public Health Service
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Keywords
theory of mind, narrative comprehension, temporoparietal junction, posterior cingulate cortex, medial prefrontal cortex, social cognition, neural development, adult brain
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Cognition, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Psychological Theory, Thinking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review