Cited by 55Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Mindfulness training modulates value signals in ventromedial prefrontal cortex through input from insular cortex

Open access
Kirk, Ulrich, Gu, Xiaosi, Harvey, Ann H., Fonagy, Peter, Montague, P. Read·2014·NeuroImage

Abstract

Neuroimaging research has demonstrated that ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) encodes value signals that can be modulated by top-down cognitive input such as semantic knowledge, price incentives, and monetary favors suggesting that such biases may have an identified biological basis. It has been hypothesized that mindfulness training (MT) provides one path for gaining control over such top-down influences; yet, there have been no direct tests of this hypothesis. Here, we probe the behavioral and neural effects of MT on value signals in vmPFC in a randomized longitudinal design of 8 weeks of MT on an initially naïve subject cohort. The impact of this within-subject training was assessed using two paradigms: one that employed primary rewards (fruit juice) in a simple conditioning task and another that used a well-validated art-viewing paradigm to test bias of monetary favors on preference. We show that MT behaviorally censors the top-down bias of monetary favors through a measurable influence on value signals in vmPFC. MT also modulates value signals in vmPFC to primary reward delivery. Using a separate cohort of subjects we show that 8 weeks of active control training (ACT) generates the same behavioral impact also through an effect on signals in the vmPFC. Importantly, functional connectivity analyses show that value signals in vmPFC are coupled with bilateral posterior insula in the MT groups in both paradigms, but not in the ACT groups. These results suggest that MT integrates interoceptive input from insular cortex in the context of value computations of both primary and secondary rewards.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.035

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A neural circuit comprising the prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, amygdala, and insula is involved in the unique processes of mindful emotion regulation.

    “In line with the above cited and other recent evidence [81, 83–85], we outline a neural circuit comprising the prefrontal cortex (PFC), the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), the amygdala (A), and the insula (I) that are involved in the unique processes of mindful emotion regulation.”

    From Mindful emotion regulation: Exploring the neurocognitive mechanisms behind mindfulness (2015) · cites this paper as [85]

    The Results (no page available) link mindfulness training to recruitment of the anterior insula during value computation, and the Discussion (no page available) describes a possible interaction between insula input and ventromedial prefrontal valuation systems in self-regulation. The paper does not establish the proposed four-region circuit: it does not link the anterior cingulate cortex or amygdala to that interaction, or show that the interaction governs mindful emotion regulation. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kirk, U., Gu, X., Harvey, A. H., Fonagy, P., & Montague, P. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern Denmark (DK)
  • Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
  • Virginia Tech (US)
  • Anna Freud Centre (GB)
Corresponding author
Montague, P. Read
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-10
Volume
100
Pages
254-262
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2044743256
Cited by
55
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2
FWCI
9.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA011723-11)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01 NS045790)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
mindfulness training, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, value signals, insula, interoception, preference bias, primary reward, functional connectivity, top-down cognitive control
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Reward, Prefrontal Cortex, Young Adult, Mindfulness, Interoception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review