Cited by 1,023Action Observation and SynchronizationChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentFace Recognition and Perception

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dissociable Medial Prefrontal Contributions to Judgments of Similar and Dissimilar Others

Open access

Abstract

Human social interaction requires the recognition that other people are governed by the same types of mental states-beliefs, desires, intentions-that guide one's own behavior. We used functional neuroimaging to examine how perceivers make mental state inferences when such self-other overlap can be assumed (when the other is similar to oneself) and when it cannot (when the other is dissimilar from oneself). We observed a double dissociation such that mentalizing about a similar other engaged a region of ventral mPFC linked to self-referential thought, whereas mentalizing about a dissimilar other engaged a more dorsal subregion of mPFC. The overlap between judgments of self and similar others suggests the plausibility of "simulation" accounts of social cognition, which posit that perceivers can use knowledge about themselves to infer the mental states of others.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.03.040

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 63 references

4 of the 63 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 1,000

Metadata

Authors
Mitchell, J. P., Macrae, C. N., & Banaji, M. R.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
Corresponding author
Mitchell, Jason P.
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-05
Volume
50
Issue
4
Pages
655-663
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2103551585
Cited by
1,023
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 55 · 2014: 70 · 2013: 79 · 2012: 76
FWCI
73.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Center for Research Resources (P41-RR-14075, P41RR014075)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
medial prefrontal cortex, mentalization, theory of mind, self-other similarity, social cognition, simulation theory, self-referential processing, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, double dissociation, mental state inference
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Judgment, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Social Behavior, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review