Cited by 292Memory and Neural MechanismsNeural dynamics and brain functionSleep and Wakefulness Research

Reverse replay of hippocampal place cells is uniquely modulated by changing reward

Open access
Ambrose, R. Ellen, Pfeiffer, Brad E., Foster, David J.·2016·Neuron

Abstract

Hippocampal replays are episodes of sequential place cell activity during sharp-wave ripple oscillations (SWRs). Conflicting hypotheses implicate awake replay in learning from reward and in memory retrieval for decision making. Further, awake replays can be forward, in the same order as experienced, or reverse, in the opposite order. However, while the presence or absence of reward has been reported to modulate SWR rate, the effect of reward changes on replay, and on replay direction in particular, has not been examined. Here we report divergence in the response of forward and reverse replays to changing reward. While both classes of replays were observed at reward locations, only reverse replays increased their rate at increased reward or decreased their rate at decreased reward, while forward replays were unchanged. These data demonstrate a unique relationship between reverse replay and reward processing and point to a functional distinction between different directions of replay. VIDEO ABSTRACT.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.07.047

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Decoded spatial locations during sharp-wave ripple-related reactivations clustered around the reward zone, indicating preferential reactivation of this behaviorally salient area.

    “Decoded spatial locations during sharp-wave ripple–related reactivations clustered around the reward zone (Supplementary Fig. 3; see also refs. 47,48), indicating preferential reactivation of this behaviorally salient area.”

    From Place and behavioral modulation of hippocampal neurons during immobility (2026) · cites this paper as [47]

    The Results section reports that most replayed trajectories began at the rat’s actual location, and the paper describes forward and reverse replays occurring at reward locations. It also finds that reverse-replay rates change with reward. These passages support a relationship between replay and reward, but they do not establish that decoded spatial locations clustered around the reward zone. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Representations of rewarded spatial locations are preferentially reactivated in both wake and sleep states, although there are also findings of a bias in the opposite direction.

    “representations of rewarded spatial locations are preferentially reactivated in both wake and sleep states, 80,81,[142][143][144] although there are also findings of a bias of reactivations in the opposite direction.”

    From Sleep—A brain-state serving systems memory consolidation (2023) · cites this paper as [142]

    The Abstract reports that awake reverse replay at reward locations increased with increased reward, while forward replay did not. The Introduction says replay also occurs during slow-wave sleep, but our copy does not establish preferential reactivation of rewarded locations during sleep. The cited paper therefore supports the awake component, not the claim across both states. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ambrose, R. E., Pfeiffer, B. E., & Foster, D. J.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Foster, David J.
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-09
Volume
91
Issue
5
Pages
1124-1136
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2507425266
Cited by
292
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 2
FWCI
16.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH085823, R01MH103325)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
hippocampal replay, place cells, sharp-wave ripples, reward, memory retrieval, decision-making, reward processing
MeSH terms
Place Cells, Animals, Hippocampus, Male, Models, Neurological, Reward, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review