Cited by 71Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The dynamics of deductive reasoning: An fMRI investigation

Rodriguez-Moreno, Diana, Hirsch, Joy·2009·Neuropsychologia

Abstract

Although the basis for deductive reasoning has been a traditional focus of philosophical discussion, the neural correlates and mechanisms that underlie deductive reasoning have only recently become the focus of scientific investigation. In syllogistic deductive reasoning information presented in two related sequential premises leads to a subsequent conclusion. While previous imaging studies have identified frontal, parietal, temporal, and occipital complexes that are activated during these reasoning events, there are substantive differences among the findings with respect to the specific regions engaged in reasoning and the contribution of language areas. Further, little is known about the various stages of information processing during reasoning. Using event-related fMRI and an auditory and visual conjunction technique, we identified a long-range supramodal network active during reasoning processes including areas in the left frontal and parietal regions as well as the bilateral caudate nucleus. Time courses of activation for each of these regions suggest that reasoning processes emerge during the presentation of the second premise, and remain active until the validation of the conclusion. Thus, areas within the frontal and parietal regions are differentially engaged at different time points in the reasoning process consistent with coordinated intra-network interactions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.08.030

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rodriguez-Moreno, D., & Hirsch, J.
Venue
Neuropsychologia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-03
Volume
47
Issue
4
Pages
949-961
ISSN
0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2074573545
Cited by
71
References
65
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
  • Weill Cornell Medicine
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
Keywords
deductive reasoning, syllogistic reasoning, caudate nucleus, left frontal cortex, parietal cortex
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Mental Processes, Neuropsychological Tests, Oxygen, Photic Stimulation, Time Factors, Nonlinear Dynamics, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review