Cited by 449Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsCancer-related cognitive impairment studies

Stability of the preclinical episodic memory deficit in Alzheimer's disease

Bäckman, Lars, Small, Brent J., Fratiglioni, Laura·2001·Brain

Abstract

We sought to determine the course of the preclinical episodic memory deficit in Alzheimer's disease. Using data from a population-based study, we compared persons who developed Alzheimer's disease n = 15) with persons who were non-demented n = 105) 6 and 3 years prior to the diagnosis of dementia. Participants were tested on tasks assessing episodic memory free recall and recognition of words) and short-term memory digit span). The incident Alzheimer's disease cases performed more poorly than their non-demented counterparts both 3 and 6 years before diagnosis on recall and recognition. There were no group differences in either forward or backward digit span. The selective impairment of episodic memory before the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease is consistent with the view that early changes in the hippocampal complex play an important role in the memory deficit in preclinical Alzheimer's disease. On both preclinical measurement occasions, recall and recognition made independent contributions to group classification in logistic regression analyses. However, there was no evidence for accelerated decline of episodic memory in the incident Alzheimer's disease group from 6 to 3 years before diagnosis. These results indicate that Alzheimer's disease is characterized by a long preclinical period during which episodic memory deficits are detectable. The magnitude of these deficits appears to be quite stable, at least up to 3 years before diagnosis. This may reflect the fact that those biological events that eventually result in clinically diagnosed Alzheimer's disease e.g. the appearance of amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles) accumulate at a relatively slow rate.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/124.1.96

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bäckman, L., Small, B. J., & Fratiglioni, L.
Affiliations
Uppsala University (SE)
Corresponding author
Bäckman, Lars
Venue
Brain
Published
2001-01
Volume
124
Issue
1
Pages
96-102
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W2114631079
Cited by
449
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 23
FWCI
8.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Keywords
preclinical Alzheimer's disease, episodic memory, memory stability, free recall, recognition memory, short-term memory, digit span, hippocampal complex, dementia onset, amyloid plaques, neurofibrillary tangles, memory decline
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Male, Memory Disorders, Memory, Short-Term, Neuropsychological Tests, Predictive Value of Tests, Mental Recall, Verbal Behavior, Comorbidity, Incidence, Logistic Models, Disease Progression, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review