Cited by 289Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsCognitive Functions and Memory

The influence of context boundaries on memory for the sequential order of events

Open access
DuBrow, Sarah, Davachi, Lila·2013·Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Abstract

Episodic memory allows people to reexperience the past by recovering the sequences of events that characterize those prior experiences. Although experience is continuous, people are able to selectively retrieve and reexperience more discrete episodes from their past, raising the possibility that some elements become tightly related to each other in memory, whereas others do not. The current series of experiments was designed to ask how shifts in context during an experience influence how people remember the past. Specifically, we asked how context shifts influence the ability to remember the relative order of past events, a hallmark of episodic memory. We found that memory for the order of events was enhanced within, rather than across, context shifts, or boundaries (Experiment 1). Next, we showed that this relative enhancement in order memory was eliminated when across-item associative processing was disrupted (Experiment 2), suggesting that context shifts have a selective effect on sequential binding. Finally, we provide evidence that the act of making order memory judgments involves the reactivation of representations that bridged the tested items (Experiment 3). Together, these data suggest that boundaries may serve to parse continuous experience into sequences of contextually related events and that this organization facilitates remembering the temporal order of events that share the same context.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0034024

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Abrupt changes in stimulus features and/or task goals produce separation in memory.

    “In particular, inducing abrupt changes in stimulus features and/or task goals creates separation in memory [19,23–25].”

    From Does mental context drift or shift? (2017) · cites this paper as [24]

  • An associative task that asks people to retain item order could reduce drift, helping them recall items as a sequence.

    “In contrast, performing an associative task with the goal of remembering the temporal order of items might slow contextual drift so that items can be better remembered together in sequence [24].”

    From Does mental context drift or shift? (2017) · cites this paper as [24]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DuBrow, S., & Davachi, L.
Affiliations
New York University (US)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
Published
2013-11
Volume
142
Issue
4
Pages
1277-1286
ISSN
  • 0096-3445 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2222
OpenAlex
W1994803615
Cited by
289
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology General (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (RO1-MH074692)
  • National Science Foundation (DGE-0813964)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
episodic memory, temporal order memory, context change, sequential binding, associative processing, memory reactivation, memory organization
MeSH terms
Adult, Discrimination, Psychological, Humans, Memory, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Memory, Episodic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review